Andrew Romano
|
Mon, May 12 2008
A round-up of this morning's must-read stories.
ALREADY, OBAMA AND MCCAIN MAP FALL STRATEGIES
(Adam Nagourney and Jeff Zeleny, New York Times)
In a sign of what could be an extremely unusual fall campaign, the
two sides said Saturday that they would be open to holding joint forums
or unmoderated debates across the country in front of voters through
the summer. Mr. Obama, campaigning in Oregon, said that the proposal,
floated by Mr. McCain’s advisers, was “a great idea.”... He and
Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, are starting to
assemble teams in the key battlegrounds, develop negative advertising
and engage each other in earnest on the issues and a combustible mix of
other topics, including age and patriotism. Mr. McCain, of Arizona,
will spend the next week delivering a series of speeches on global
warming,
evidence of his intention to battle Mr. Obama for independent voters...
Clearly concerned that questions about such things
as his association with his former pastor had damaged his standing with
independents, Mr. Obama, of Illinois, is likely to embark on a
summertime tour intended to highlight the life story that was once
central to his appeal. Preliminary plans include a stop in Hawaii, his
birthplace, and a major address there at Punchbowl Cemetery, where his
maternal grandfather, who fought in World War II, is buried... Both
sides say the states clearly in play now include Colorado, Florida,
Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. Republicans
said they hoped to put New Jersey and possibly California into play;
Democrats said African-Americans could make Mr. Obama competitive in
Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. Mr. Obama’s advisers said
they had a strong chance of taking Colorado, Iowa, Nevada, New Mexico,
Ohio and Virginia away from the Republican column.
HOW TO END A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN
(Ben Smith, Politico)
Clinton
is balancing a range of considerations: her bank account; her
political future and the party’s; her need to win back Obama’s
supporters, particularly African-Americans; and her need to keep faith
with voters in her own (nearly) half of the party, many of whom have
grown to dislike her rival. And so her options range from swift and
gracious (although time is
running out on that one) to the political version of Custer’s last
stand: taking a losing hand to the Democratic National Convention in
August. Each has its benefits and its drawbacks, but together they’re
what’s left of Clinton’s options.
1) Never Say Die... 2) Extract a Job... 3) Cash Out...
4) Kicking and Screaming...
5) Racial Meltdown...
6) Unconditional surrender.
HILLARY WHO? OBAMA ACTS LIKE IT'S OVER
(Carrie Budoff Brown and Kenneth P. Vogel, Politico)
When
the election returns filter in Tuesday from West Virginia, Sen. Barack
Obama won’t be there. Nor will he leapfrog ahead to a later primary
state, as he usually does on election nights. Exercising his new-found
role as the likely Democratic nominee, Obama will instead travel to
Missouri, a general election swing state, to begin laying the
groundwork for November. He will do the same next week in Florida,
raising money and setting out on what aides describe as a fence-mending
bid in the orphaned state. The travel schedule is just one mark of a
candidate eager to shift from primary to general election mode. Obama
and his aides repeatedly told reporters this weekend that the
primary is not yet over. But the signs of change were everywhere during
the senator’s first campaign trip after a big win in North Carolina and
a narrow loss in Indiana nudged him closer than ever to the Democratic
nomination. In a two-day swing through Oregon, Obama purged Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton from his stump speeches, addressing his
Democratic rival only when asked by voters. Obama instead focused
solely on Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee.
MORE: Obama, Clinton Adjust Aim, Target McCain (Matt Phillips and Joel Milman, Wall Street Journal)
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton stepped up their
criticism of John McCain and aimed fewer potshots at each other amid
signs the nomination fight is winding down and the Democratic Party is
coalescing around Sen. Obama. Before taking time off the campaign trail Sunday, Sen.
Obama zeroed in on the Republican presidential candidate's "gas-tax
holiday," ridiculing the proposal as saving motorists "a quarter and a
nickel a day" through the summer. He also tested a new, harsher
message: Sen. McCain's involvement in the 1987 Keating Five savings and
loan scandal would be fair game for the general election... Sen. Clinton also seemed to pull back her direct criticisms of Sen.
Obama, invoking his name only in passing at a Manhattan fund-raiser
Saturday. Instead, she sounded themes of party unity.
ENVIRONMENTAL STANCES ARE BALANCING ACT FOR MCCAIN
(Julie Eilperin, Washington Post)
McCain
has made the environment one of the key elements of his
presidential bid. He speaks passionately about the issue of climate
change on the campaign trail, and he plans to outline his vision for
combating global warming in a major speech today in Portland, Ore. "I'm
proud of my record on the environment," he said at a news
conference Friday at the Liberty Science Center in Jersey City. "As
president, I will dedicate myself to addressing the issue of climate
change globally." But an examination of McCain's voting record shows an
inconsistent
approach to the environment: He champions some "green" causes while
casting sometimes contradictory votes on others.
QUESTIONS FOR JOHN MCCAIN
(George Will, Newsweek)
Peripatetic John McCain, the human pinball, continues to carom around
the country as his rivals gnaw on each other. Although action, not
reflection, is his forte, perhaps he should go to earth somewhere,
while the Democrats continue the destruction, and answer some
questions, such as... Our goal in Iraq
is "success," which you define as "the establishment of a generally
peaceful, stable, prosperous, democratic state." Would a "generally"
peaceful, stable, prosperous but authoritarian state be unacceptable?
Or a mildly prosperous and "generally" stable state but one with
simmering violence—which describes a number of nations today, including
Iraq? Does the task of making your four adjectives descriptive of Iraq
require and therefore justify more years of military involvement in the
suppression of groups that are manifestations of sectarianism,
criminality and warlordism? What other nations should we police?
CONTINUED AFTER THE JUMP...
More