Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
  • Rep. Joseph Cao, the Sole Republican to Support Pelosi Health Bill

    Daniel Stone | Sat, Nov 07 2009

    House Minority Whip Eric Cantor promised Capitol Hill protesters on Friday that not one Republican would approve the Democrats' health care bill. But Cantor's vow of unanimity slipped Saturday night when the final vote tally -- 220 to 215 in support of the bill -- revealed Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao, a Republican from Louisiana, cast a yes vote.

    His reason for being the lone GOP nod? "I have always said that I would put aside partisan wrangling to do the business of the people. My vote tonight was based on my priority of doing what is best for my constituents," he said in a statement quickly released by his office. Earlier in the evening, he also supported a controversial amendment (which also passed) from Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak prohibiting any federal money from funding abortion.

    More
  • High Anxiety as Leadership Scrambles for Last Health Care Votes

    Daniel Stone | Sat, Nov 07 2009
    The partisan spread in the House would seem to give a clear indication of how Speaker Pelosi’s health care vote will go down—or at least how she’d like it to. Democrats currently hold a 40 seat majority (258-218) over Republicans, which is sizable by historical standards. But as the House winds down its weekend debate of Pelosi’s brick of a bill, the vote won’t mirror the partisan spread. At least 20 conservative Democrats have already vowed to oppose it, and a growing yet unknown number say they’ll do the same. Would Pelosi open a vote on her own bill if it could actually fail?
    More
  • Official: Timing of Hasan's gun purchase shows "Of course, he planned this."

    Michael Isikoff | Sat, Nov 07 2009
    Just three weeks after being transferred to the U.S. Army base at Fort Hood, Texas, Maj. Nidal Hasan  walked into the "Guns Galore" gunship in Killeen, Texas and purchased the high powered semi-automatic pistol that he allegedly used in the mass shooting at the base on Thursday, a senior law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told Declassified. 

       The timing of the purchase of the Belgian made FN Herstal 5.7 pistol -- a growing weapon of choice of Mexican drug cartels -- is being viewed by some investigators as a potentially important clue suggesting that Hasan may have been plotting the attack for some time.

        Hasan bought the gun on Aug. 1 of this year, said the law enforcement official, who asked that his name and agency not be identified because of the ongoing investigation. (Although Hasan's purchase of the gun was reported Friday by ABC and other news organizations, the date of the purchase has not previously been disclosed. A second federal law enforcement official confirmed the Aug. 1 date to Declassified on Saturday.)

    More
  • To Pay Abu Omar, CIA's Man in Milan Loses Villa

    Michael Isikoff | Sat, Nov 07 2009

    When an Italian judge last week sentenced 23 Americans in absentia for the CIA-orchestrated abduction of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr--a symbolic condemnation of the Bush administration's extraordinary-rendition program--the CIA's top officer in Milan at the time, Robert Seldon Lady, got the harshest sentence (eight years). Nobody expects Lady to serve time. He has long since left Italy, and the government of Silvio Berlusconi--whose military-intelligence chief cooperated with the abduction--is unlikely to seek extradition.

    But there may be some rough justice in the case after all: the country villa that Lady once purchased as a retirement home is now slated to be sold to pay the $2.2 million in court-ordered damages due the very man Lady was convicted of kidnapping. A magistrate seized the villa, in the northwest part of the country, more than two years ago (Italian law allows for the property of criminal suspects to be confiscated to pay court costs). "It's a beautiful house," Armando Spataro, the prosecutor who oversaw the case, told NEWSWEEK in a phone interview. Once the lawyer for Nasr--a radical Muslim cleric also known as Abu Omar--petitions the court, "the money will go to Abu Omar," Spataro says. Lady could not be reached for comment, and a CIA spokesman said last week that the agency would have no comment on any aspect of the case.

    More
  • Is Ft. Hood Like Columbine? By Columbine's Dave Cullen

    Ashley Merryman | Fri, Nov 06 2009
    Today, like many other Americans, Po and I have been thinking about the tragedy at Ft. Hood – and how it brings back the memory of similar events such as the massacre at Columbine. But that raises a question: while the events feel similar, are they actually? It was a question I directed to Dave Cullen. Dave was a reporter at Columbine, on the day of the shooting, and he's been covering its aftermath ever since. The result of ten years of research was his haunting New York Times bestseller, Columbine. Here are Dave's thoughts.
     
    ___________
     
     
    Is Ft. Hood like Columbine? That’s the gist of the question I’ve been asked repeatedly the past 24 hours, in various incarnations. It’s a natural question, which has been running through my own head incessantly. My brain is about to bust with all the apparent parallels to Columbine, Virginia Tech and 9/11, and the startling differences to each as well. But the only responsible answer to that question is I don‘t know yet.
     
    If we have learned anything from these tragedies, is that we won’t get a firm handle on why for weeks, months or even years. At this distance from Oklahoma City, we were convinced it was the work of Arabs or Muslims, and what was the difference between those two anyway? The Columbine killers’ journals--far and away the most revealing evidence--were released in 2006, more than seven years after the murders. 
     
    The Ft. Hood perpetrator appears pretty transparent. The “obvious” factors include:
    • His religion
    • His ethnicity
    • The ridicule he endured for each 
    • His profession as a soldier
    • His profession as a psychiatrist
    • His exposure to guns
    • Relentless exposure to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in his patients
    • Opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
    • Imminent deployment there
    We have heard a lot of facts related to each of those factors already. I expect that most will turn to be true. Historically, we get the what right pretty fast. But we have a terrible record on why. An oddsmaker could reasonably predict that some of those items will prove relevant and others true but unrelated to the crime. The problem is predicting which is which.
     
    If we guess now, the myths will be us forever. Ten years after Columbine, most of the public still believes it was about jocks, Goths and the Trench Coat Mafia. No, no and no. It wasn‘t even intended primarily as a school shooting: the failed bombs were supposed to be the main event. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were not loners, outcasts or misfits, nor were most of the school shooters. Most shooters do not fit the profile we have come to accept, because no accurate profile exists.  Eric and Dylan don’t even fit a profile of each other: they were dramatically different boys in both personality and motive. They set the bombs and pulled the triggers for very different reasons. 
     
    With Columbine, speculation turned into accepted fact remarkably quickly. Most of the major myths solidified within the first 24 hours. Since then, journalists have shown great restraint. I was stunned by the coverage following Virginia Tech and most of the shootings: we learned that lesson and treaded lightly about motive. This week, it’s harder for me to assess the coverage, because I’m watching from Helsinki, where I’m attending an academic conference on school shooters. But I have been reading the blogs and the papers and watched video segments from each of the three big cable news networks, and so far, they understand the danger.
     
    It’s OK to pose questions about all those bullet points above. Any good journalist is digging to unravel what was driving this man. All those look like good leads. It’s smart to ask the questions now. It’s smart to collect data toward the answers. But it’s foolish to start drawing conclusions. 


  • From Ft. Hood to Florida: Lots of Questions, Few Answers on the Psyche of Shooters

    Newsweek | Fri, Nov 06 2009
    by Rabeika Messina We don’t know much about suspected Ft. Hood killer Nidal Malik Hasan : there are reports he gave away his possessions. There are reports he was terrified of being deployed. And there’s the fact that prior to his killing spree, Hasan... More
  • Fort Hood Shooter: How Recently Was His Security Clearance Updated?

    Mark Hosenball | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    Did Army security or intelligence officials miss potential warning signs in the behavior of accused Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan? One issue that is likely to be examined by the inquiries into Hasan’s shooting spree is the effectiveness of Army security-clearance procedures. According to Wayne Hall, a spokesman at Army headquarters at the Pentagon, everyone who receives a commission as a U.S. Army officer has to undergo a security investigation, which qualifies him or her, at a minimum, to handle information classified “secret.” While Hall said he could offer no specific information on the status of security clearances held by Hasan, he said standard practice is that officers normally have to receive their secret clearance before they are formally commissioned, and that sometimes commissions are held up pending the successful conclusion of the security check. Hall said that these rules apply to all Army officers, and indicated he had no reason to believe that Maj. Hasan was an exception.

    Army officers who are on active duty are supposed to have their security clearances reviewed and updated every five years if they have a top-secret clearance and every 15 years if they have only a secret clearance. Hasan’s official military record shows that he was first commissioned in June 1997, meaning that if his clearance is top secret, he should have been reinvestigated twice, most recently in 2007, but that if his clearance is only secret, he's not due for an update until 2012. When it comes to civilian Pentagon employees, security-clearance updates have been known to fall behind schedule—sometimes years behind. But when it comes to military officers on active duty, the service tries to stick to the rules to ensure the reliability of troops if they are sent into the field.

    More
  • Fort Hood Shooter Got “Terror War” Medal

    Mark Hosenball | Fri, Nov 06 2009
    One awkward aspect of the official military record of Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, the accused Fort Hood shooter, is the fact that he was decorated with something called the “Global War on Terrorism Service Medal.” What exactly is this decoration? An Army spokesman told NEWSWEEK that the medal is “awarded to all U.S. military personnel who are serving on active duty while the U.S. is engaged in the Global War on Terrorism, regardless of where they serve.” More
  • Joe Lieberman: Climate Savior?

    Katie Connolly | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    Joe Lieberman angered a lot of liberals recently with his declaration of opposition to Harry Reid's opt-out public-option provision. But liberals who also care about climate-change legislation may want to temper their rage. Lieberman has long championed climate-change legislation in the Senate, and is emerging as a critical player in the current effort. Politico reported back in September that Lieberman had been busy meeting with a bipartisan group to figure out a path forward on climate change. In a recent interview with the National Journal, Lieberman gave some insight into his negotiating strategy.

    Lieberman knows they won't get to 60 without concessions on four key areas: nuclear, coal, agriculture, and manufacturing. Satisfying a few senators with interests in each of those industries might be enough to get the bill across the line. It looks as though Lieberman and his pals have found people to champion each issue. Tom Carper from Delaware is working on coal; Debbie Stabenow from Michigan is taking the lead on agriculture; and Sherrod Brown from Ohio is active on manufacturing. It sounds as though Lieberman himself will be central to nuclear negotiations, which makes sense given that he's close to Republicans like Lindsey Graham and John McCain who care deeply about expanding the nuclear sector.

    More
  • Newsverse: Two Inconvenient Poems

    Newsweek | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    By Jerry Adler

     

    I. Carbon Country

     

    Oh beautiful for spacious skies

    Beneath which cows metabolize

    All those amber waves of grain

    And fill the heavens with methane.

    For purple mountain majesties

    Whose glaciers melt and lakes won’t freeze

    Yes, my country, ‘tis of thee--

    Land of private property--

    I sing. And of the fruited plains

    Which someday soon will sprout plantains.

    And coconuts to fill the cargo

    Holds of ships that dock in Fargo

    When shining sea meets shining sea

    In Iowa or Tennessee.

    More
  • Maj. Nidal M. Hasan's Official Military Record

    Mark Hosenball | Fri, Nov 06 2009
    The following version of Maj. Nidal M. Hasan's official military record was released to NEWSWEEK by U.S. Army headquarters at the Pentagon: NAME: Nidal (AbduWali) M. Hasan RANK: Major DATE OF RANK: Captain May 17, 2003; Major May 17, 2009 PRESENT AND...
  • Another Ding for Crist on the Stimulus Flap

    Arian Campo-Flores | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    I would add one thing to Holly's post on Charlie Crist yesterday. As she notes, Crist's denials that he ever endorsed President Obama's stimulus package are deeply unconvincing. Today, the St. Petersburg Times's PolitiFact amply documents the many ways Crist has displayed support for the program. The fact-checking crew there delivered a resounding "Pants on Fire" verdict.

    But let's assume for a moment that Crist's pants aren't on fire. Let's accept his comment to CNN on Wednesday that "I understood [the bill] was going to pass, and I wanted to be able to utilize it for the benefit of my fellow Floridians." Well, if that was the case, he hasn't done a very good job. As The Miami Herald reported back in August, Florida ranked last among the states for federal stimulus dollars promised per capita. It also ranked last in spending the federal highway stimulus money it had been allotted.

    More
  • Is Facebook a Paradise for Scammers?

    Daniel Lyons | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    Every day tens of millions of people log on to Facebook, the popular social-network site, and spend time playing goofy online games. But watch out. Some people playing these games are getting fleeced by scammers, tricked into signing up for products and services they didn’t want.

    Worse yet, this isn’t happening by accident. The companies that develop games for Facebook make big money by selling ad space—some of it to scammers. 

    This week, Silicon Valley blogger Michael Arrington caused a ruckus by suggesting that Facebook itself has been turning a blind eye to the scams because it is sharing in the spoils. Arrington, who runs the influential TechCrunch blog, is on a crusade to pressure Facebook to clean up its act.

    “Ultimately this is Facebook’s fault,” Arrington says. He says the social-networking site isn’t enforcing its own rules against scam ads. “It’s like with Major League Baseball and steroids. If the rules aren’t enforced, which is what’s happening on Facebook, then people are going to break the rules. Facebook needs to stop this.”
    More
  • Conservative Media on Fort Hood Shooting

    David A. Graham | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    A look at the conservative media this morning shows a variety of approaches to the Fort Hood shooting. While most commentators are interested in addressing the question of Islamic terror, and particularly homegrown Islamism, there's clearly a concern in many quarters to avoid generalizations or overstatements--although others, like Michelle Malkin, have decided to go full-speed ahead. But that caution has not prevented sharp criticism of mainstream media reporting or of President Barack Obama's response to the incident.

    Several outlets are counseling caution before jumping to conclusions about alleged shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. The National Review's Corner blog is characteristically prolific but is hewing close to the facts, mostly noting what's being reported about Hasan, much of which deals with his religion. The magazine's Victor Davis Hanson, however, grapples directly with the question of Islam in the case, and argues that Americans' understanding of Islamic terror has not progressed in the last eight years and needs to be updated.

    In other words, the narrative after 9/11 largely remains that Americans have given in to illegitimate "fear and mistrust" of Muslims in general. A saner approach would be to acknowledge that there is a small minority of Muslims who channel generic Islamist fantasies, so that we can assume that either formal terrorist plots or individual acts of murder will more or less occur here every three to six months.

    More
  • "This Is a Betrayal": A Chaplain Discusses the Long Recovery From Ft. Hood and the Lasting Legacy of PTSD

    Eve Conant | Fri, Nov 06 2009

    An ordained Baptist chaplain and army captain, Roger Benimoff spent two tours of duty in Iraq and months between deployments counseling soldiers in the U.S. During his career, he provided spiritual guidance to American soldiers through crises of faith, bereavement, and trauma until he himself broke down. While training and working as a chaplain at Walter Reed during the height of its crisis, Benimoff was diagnosed with chronic PTSD and spent months of treatment at some of the facilities where he trained as a caretaker. NEWSWEEK's Eve Conant has tracked Benimoff's experiences over the years, starting with his time at Walter Reed, and recently in a book about his experiences, Faith Under Fire. Benimoff retired from the army earlier this year. He spoke with Conant from Dallas, where he is a hospital chaplain, about what might have happened in Ft. Hood, how the military families will cope with tragedy on the homefront, and why the army pushed him so far he had to leave.

    Is "contact" or "secondary" PTSD a genuine problem?

    Oh yes, definitely. I didn't have much time to counsel before I was deployed—I had only three weeks active duty before going over—but I would debrief my soldiers in Iraq all the time about events I was not present at. I remember when Eagle Troop had lost a soldier to a sniper and I did the CISD [Critical Incident Stress Debriefing]. I still have those images in my head. Or when one of Fox Troop's tanks went over a land mine. The soldiers told me about how the IED blew through their tank, how the driver's body was completely destroyed, how it was like spaghetti, and they were desperately trying to pull him out of the driver's seat while their command told them to leave the scene. They didn't leave him behind. But the tension of that, and their descriptions of that moment stay with me. When Eagle Troop lost a sergeant to an RPG they told me about running into the hospital, seeing Iraq soldiers vomiting on the stairs after what they had just seen—walls covered in blood, brain matter on the floor. These images don't go away and I wasn't even there that day.

    More
  • Is Fort Hood a Harbinger? Nidal Malik Hasan May Be a Symptom of a Military on the Brink.

    Andrew Bast | Fri, Nov 06 2009

     

    What if Thursday's atrocious slaughter at Fort Hood only signals that the worst is yet to come? The murder scene Thursday afternoon at the Killeen, Texas, military base, the largest in the country, was heart-wrenching. Details remained murky, but at least 13 are dead and 30 wounded in a killing spree that may momentarily remind us of a reality that most Americans can readily forget: soldiers and their families are living, and bending, under a harrowing and unrelenting stress that will not let up any time soon. And the U.S. military could well be reaching a breaking point as the president decides to send more troops into Afghanistan.

    It's hard to draw too many conclusions right now, but we do know this: Thursday night, authorities shot and then apprehended the lone suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. A psychiatrist who was set to deploy to Iraq at the end of the month, Hasan reportedly opened fire around the Fort Hood Readiness Center, where troops are prepared for deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. And though this scene is a most extreme and tragic outlier, it comes at a time when the stress of combat has affected so many soldiers individually that it makes it increasingly difficult for the military as a whole to deploy for wars abroad. In an abrupt news conference, Lt. Gen. Robert Cone, the top commander at Fort Hood, said in response to the shooting that authorities would "increase the security presence" on the military base. On the surface, it seemed like a logical enough plan. But it makes one wonder how much any kind of lockdown will either get at the root causes of soldier stresses or better prepare them for more battle.

    More
  • Russia's Auto Wreck

    Owen Matthews | Fri, Nov 06 2009
    Two years ago, Russia was one of the ­fastest-­growing auto markets in the world--but few Western carmakers were willing to risk a partnership there. Then, in 2007, Renault purchased a 25 percent stake in AvtoVaz, whose Lada brand was famous for... More
  • Why Teenagers Are Growing Up So Slowly Today

    Po Bronson | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    Here’s a Twilight Zone-type premise for you. What if surgeons never got to work on humans, they were instead just endlessly in training, cutting up cadavers? What if the same went for all adults – we only got to practice at simulated versions of our jobs? Lawyers only got to argue mock cases, for years and years. Plumbers only got to fix fake leaks in classrooms. Teachers only got to teach to videocameras, endlessly rehearsing for some far off future. Book writers like me never saw our work put out to the public – our novels sat in drawers. Scientists never got to do original experiments; they only got to recreate scientific experiments of yesteryear. And so on.

    Rather quickly, all meaning would vanish from our work. Even if we enjoyed the activity of our job, intrinsically, it would rapidly lose depth and relevance. It’d lose purpose. We’d become bored, lethargic, and disengaged.

    In other words, we’d turn into teenagers.

    This is the metaphorical vision of adolescent life Dr. Joe Allen paints in his insightful new book, Escaping the Endless Adolescence, coauthored with his wife, Dr. Claudia Worrell Allen.

    Allen has concluded that our urge to protect teenagers from real life – because we don’t think they’re ready yet – has tragically backfired. By insulating them from adult-like work, adult social relationships, and adult consequences, we have only delayed their development. We have made it harder for them to grow up. Maybe even made it impossible to grow up on time.

    Basically, we long ago decided that teens ought to be in school, not in the labor force. Education was their future. But the structure of schools is endlessly repetitive. “From a Martian’s perspective, high schools look virtually the same as sixth grade,” said Allen. “There’s no recognition, in the structure of school, that these are very different people with different capabilities.” Strapped to desks for 13+ years, school becomes both incredibly montonous, artificial, and cookie-cutter.

    As Allen writes, “We place kids in schools together with hundreds, sometimes thousands, of other kids typically from similar economic and cultural backgrounds. We group them all within a year or so of one another in age. We equip them with similar gadgets, expose them to the same TV shows, lessons, and sports. We ask them all to take almost the exact same courses and do the exact same work and be graded relative to one another. We give them only a handful of ways in which they can meaningfully demonstrate their competencies. And then we’re surprised they have some difficulty establishing a sense of their own individuality.”

    And we wonder why it’s taking so long for them to mature. The old explanation used to be they needed time for the wave of raging hormones to dissipate (more on this tomorrow). The newer explanation is that their brains simply aren’t developed yet: their prefrontal cortex hasn’t converted from gray matter to white matter, their amygdalas have a surfeit of oxytocin receptors, and their reward centers have a paucity of dopamine receptors. Few can say for sure yet how these anatomical features actually interact and create modern teenagers, but the gist of it is quite simple – until their brains are finished, they’re not ready for real life.

    “Most parents will tell you that this idea of the immature teen brain is one of the few notions that truly provides them comfort,” says Allen. “They feel like it gets them off the hook – that it’s biological, not a fault of parenting.” But Allen speculates that our parenting style may indeed be causing their brains to be this way. Brains of teens a hundred years ago might have been far more mature. Without painful real-life experiences, modern teens’ brains never learn to tell the difference between what they should fear and what they shouldn’t. Without real consequences and real rewards, teens never learn to distinguish between good risks they should take and bad risks they shouldn’t. “We park kids on the sidelines, thinking their brains will develop if we just wait, let time pass, as if all they need is more prep courses, lessons, and enrichment courses. They need real stress and challenges.”

    As for the risk behavior we associate with adolescence, Allen cautions that “We don’t give teens enough ways to take risks that are productive.” So they turn to drinking, drug use, delinquency, and the like – because those are the only things thrilling. “According to Allen, teens aren't naturally passive – their environment makes them passive. We’re writing them off at exactly the time we need to bring out their potential.

    Allen came to this perspective partly from his scholarly research on teens, which we’ve written about before, and partly from his clinical practice with individual teens. His book tells the stories of a dozen patients who came to him in trouble. At first, these teens all manifested their problems differently, and seemed to have different symptoms. Sam was uncommunicative, unwilling to ever talk (she was forced to see Allen by the rules of her group home). Perry was a high-achieving boy who became an anorexic.  Tim was pushing himself to success, when suddenly he dropped out to draw comic books. Tonya was a small, shy student on path to get pregnant and drop out, like her sister.

    But what helped all these kids – Sam, Perry, Tim and Tonya – was a taste of real life. They found a way to do something meaningful in real life, interacting with adults, outside the realm of the high school artificial bubble, and outside the hovering control of their parents. For some, it was volunteering at organizations that really needed their help – where they felt they were making a real contribution. For others it was tutoring younger kids. For others, exploring a passion without regard to its value to their college application. Or it could be a job (not a McJob) where they interacted with adults. A little went a long way.

    I hear often from parents whose teenagers are disengaged or withdrawn. They have a hard time caring what other kids think, or what society expects of them. They’re having a hard time playing the game of resume-building for a far-off future. Now I have the perfect book to recommend: Escaping the Endless Adolescence.


  • Club for Growth Calls Out Crist on the Stimulus

    Holly Bailey | Thu, Nov 05 2009


    You knew it was coming. A day after Charlie Crist told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that he “didn’t endorse” the $787 billion federal stimulus bill, Club for Growth is up with an ad featuring TV footage of the Florida governor onstage with President Obama earlier this year praising the bill. “We know it’s important to pass this stimulus package,” Crist said at a joint rally with Obama in early February, a clip that opens up the club's ad. The group then goes through a litany of statistics suggesting how the stimulus has not helped Florida, including the state’s rising unemployment numbers, as well as the increasing federal deficit.

    On Wednesday, a day after GOP primary opponent Marco Rubio debuted a Web site trashing Crist’s appearance with Obama, the Florida governor defended himself on CNN, offering up the most unconvincing line we’ve heard since "I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” “I didn't endorse it. I didn't even have a vote on the darned thing," Crist, who also signed a letter urging the bill’s passage, told CNN. More
  • Helicopter Shortage: State Department Fumbles Effort to Oust Blackwater from Iraq

    Mark Hosenball | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    Your tax dollars at work: as part of their effort to stop doing business in Iraq with companies affiliated with the controversial paramilitary contractor formerly known as Blackwater, the State Department earlier this year hired a rival contractor to fly civilian U.S. personnel around the war-torn country by helicopter. But officials subsequently learned that the replacement contractor, Dyncorp International, was planning to use helicopters that don’t meet government safety standards. So as a result, the Department was forced to extend for several months its air-transport contract with an affiliate of ... the contractor formerly known as Blackwater.

    The State Department’s machinations are the latest chapter in the government’s turbulent relationship with companies affiliated with Blackwater, a North Carolina-based paramilitary training, protection, and transport outfit whose name became one of the most toxic words in American politics after a series of incidents in which security officers employed by the firm allegedly killed or injured Iraqi civilians. The incidents, which included eight Iraqis dying on September 16, 2007 after Blackwater employees allegedly fired automatic rifles and threw grenades into a crowd in Baghdad’s Nisoor Square, led to congressional hearings, multiple U.S. investigations of Blackwater personnel, and a declaration by the Iraqi government last March that it was withdrawing the license of Blackwater and its affiliates to do business in Iraq.

    More
  • Another Reason 2010 Isn't Exactly Like 1994

    Katie Connolly | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    Earlier this week Holly wrote a really interesting piece about the electoral parallels between now and 1993—and the fact that the GOP is hoping for a dramatic Democratic defeat in next year's midterms, similar to what happened in 1994. Holly points out several flaws in the analogy: Republicans have more baggage going into next year's elections than they did in' 94, congressional Republicans have exceptionally low approval ratings, the GOP lacks strong national leadership, and there's damaging infighting between conservatives and moderates. But I'd like to add another difference to the list: health-care reform.

    The dismal failure of the Clinton health-care plan in the summer of 1994 helped crystallize support for the GOP. Its final whimper came just months before the '94 congressionals, ending a long, fierce battle on an abysmal note for Democrats. This time around, health-care reform will pass. It won't be an ambitious overhaul along the lines that Clinton had envisioned. And, in the end, it may not even include a public option (although the White House assures me it will.) But health-care reform, in some fashion, will be passed, and it will be done well in advance of the election. By the time the voting booths open, the health-care debate will be done. (Until, of course, it is revived, probably in the middle of the next decade, when the reforms have been implemented and either ambitious liberals attempt to strengthen it or conservatives try to stymie it.) More
  • Pentagon Played Aerosmith and Nine Inch Nails to Torture Detainees; Artists Complain

    Krista Gesaman | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    Will listening to hours of Britney Spears, Nine Inch Nails or even the Meow Mix jingle make you lose your mind? That’s exactly what military officials were hoping for when they blasted hours of loud music to prisoners detained at Guantánamo Bay and in Iraq and Afghanistan prisons. The National Security Archive, an independent research institute that works to publish declassified information, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request on October 22 to a variety of government agencies including the Department of the Army, U.S. Central Command, Defense Intelligence Agency and the CIA, seeking all intelligence reports, briefings, and recordings of loud music used during the detention and interrogation of detainees.

    The request for information relied on 20 declassified documents, all of which refer to the use of “loud” music as a way to control Guantánamo detainees. One detainee claims he was subjected to hours of deafening music by Eminem and Metallica as a form of sleep deprivation. According to the FOIA request other artists possibly used include Aerosmith, James Taylor, and Tupac Shakur.

    More
  • In Letter, CDC Head Thomas Frieden Tries to Head off the Looming H1N1 Vaccine Wars

    Newsweek | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    The H1N1 vaccine shortage isn’t just frustrating. It’s unleashing an ethical and emotionally-charged debate about people’s shot-worthiness. Back in August, the CDC announced recommendations on who should be first in line for vaccination. The list: pregnant women, caregivers for babies under 6 months, health-care workers, anybody 6 months to 25 years old, and people with health conditions like asthma and diabetes. But we all know that vaccine distribution hasn’t gone perfectly—lines have been long, supplies have run out, and, yes, some Americans have gotten the shot when they shouldn’t have.

    All of this blew up into a vitriolic exchange on a local moms bulletin board in Washington, D.C., after a mother said she’d gotten vaccinated at a Virginia clinic even though she didn’t qualify. And she urged other moms to do the same to protect their kids. Hello swine-flu mommy wars. One woman called her selfish. (And there were choicer words, too.) Another warned there would be a “day of reckoning” for people like her. And this: “To the people who have gotten the H1N1 vaccine and are not in the CDC priority groups—WHAT YOU DID IS DISGUSTING. YOU ARE DISGUSTING.”

    The calmer posts said she wasn’t at fault: at least some health-care workers at the clinic, they reported, were encouraging people to get the vaccine while they could—even if they weren’t in one of the priority groups. But that’s not supposed to happen, at least not until more ample supplies of vaccine are available. Moms aren’t the only ones at war. A report that Goldman Sachs and other big New York companies have received vaccine has some people up in arms, even though Goldman says it’ll provide it only to high-risk groups. And then there’s the news that Gitmo detainees will get vaccines, too. House Republican John Boehner isn’t too happy about that—and neither are a lot of other people.

    Now, CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden is pulling out his megaphone and trying to bring some order. In a letter sent to state and local health officers and released by the CDC today, Frieden said, “It is more important than ever to focus on ensuring equitable access to the vaccine for the priority groups.” He went on to ask local health officials to review their plans immediately and “work to ensure that the maximum number of doses is delivered to those at greatest risk as rapidly as possible.”

    Frieden does a good job walking the line between thanking public health officials for their hard work—they are, after all, on the receiving end of vaccine frustration—and making it clear that they need to abide by the recommendations. Now it’s up to the vaccinators to listen.

    Read the entire letter after the jump.

    More
  • In Round One of the Census Battle, Vitter and Bennett Lose

    Arian Campo-Flores | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    Here's an update to an entry I posted last week. As I noted then, the 2010 census has sparked a battle over whether undocumented immigrants should be part of the count and thus included in state tallies used to reapportion congressional seats, as has been the case in past cycles. The opening round of that fight was a proposed amendment sponsored by Republican Sens. David Vitter and Robert Bennett that would have added a question to the census survey asking whether the respondent is a citizen or not. The aim was to later strip out noncitizens when it came time for reapportionment.

    Well, the senators lost that round. Earlier today, the amendment was blocked when the Senate voted 60-39 to end debate on an appropriations bill. But don't expect the issue to go away anytime soon. A Vitter spokesman, Joel DiGrado, says the senator will try to find other legislative vehicles for the amendment and will continue to press the matter. He's "not going to just stop talking about the issue," says DiGrado.

    More
  • Health Care's Prayer Provision: How Complementary and Alternative Medicine Fits Into Obama's Evidence-Based Model

    Sarah Kliff | Thu, Nov 05 2009

    Should health-care reform require insurers to cover chiropractors? Acupuncturists? Yoga? Spiritual healers? These are the questions raised by a recently noticed health-care amendment requiring insurers to consider covering "religious and spiritual health care."

    The amendment, covered in this Los Angeles Times article, comes with backing from Senate heavyweights like Orrin Hatch, John Kerry, and the late Ted Kennedy. And while it does not mention Christian Science by name, it's been widely interpreted as a protection of the church's prayer treatments, which it encourages as an alternative to medical help. Others have understood the provision as even more far-reaching as to include any health provider acting within the scope of their license.The Freedom From Religion Foundation has criticized the amendment as an unconstitutional violation of church and state.

    Even with its powerful supporters, the amendment seems unlikely to make the final bill; Pelosi already dropped it from the House version. But just the suggestion of covering religious health care highlights a difficult question for reformers: how, exactly, does prayer fit into the president's support for evidence-based medicine? Or, more broadly, is there a place for any sort of unproven, alternative medicine, religious or otherwise, in health-care reform?

    More