Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com

Declassified

RSS
SPONSORED BY

Author

Michael Isikoff

Mark Hosenball





Links

Featured Postings

Senate Republicans Allegedly Block Key Intelligence Nominations

6:43 PM, January 25, 2010 | Comments (6)
Obama administration officials and Senate Democrats are complaining that Senate Republicans are secretly blocking approval of two nominees to key U.S. intelligence posts. Following public hearings, the Senate Intelligence Committee last month approved...

Spies Hit Back at Critics of Alleged Security Lapses in Afghan Bombing Incident

7:08 PM, January 9, 2010 | Comments (13)

Interpol Chief on Beck and Gingrich:'Not Within the Realm of Reality'

12:25 PM, January 9, 2010 | Comments (15)

Archives

See All from October
Previous
October 2009
Next
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
       
Full Post
Posted Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:04 PM

McChrystal Mistakenly Reveals Secret CIA Report

Mark Hosenball
In his widely reported London speech earlier this month, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, described how people constantly offer him ideas for fixing that country's problems. One of the more unusual recommendations, he suggested, came from a paper that advocated using a "plan called 'Chaosistan.' " McChrystal said it advised letting Afghanistan become a "Somalia-like haven of chaos that we simply manage from outside," but there was no further explanation of its origins.

When journalists from NEWSWEEK and other media outlets asked McChrystal's entourage about where the paper came from, they were directed to an obscure Web posting—an October 1998 speech headlined "What is Chaostan [sic]?" delivered by investment adviser Richard Maybury at a New Orleans conference for gold enthusiasts. Maybury predicted that 24 wars in "Chaostan"—a vast region stretching from Poland to North Africa to China, Vietnam, and Indonesia—would eventually merge into World War III. From an investor's point of view, Maybury wrote, this will be "great for weapons stocks and security--equipment stocks…and non-Chaostan oil investments." Was this really what McChrystal was referring to?

It seems unlikely. Two U.S. intelligence officials, who asked for anonymity when discussing a sensitive matter, say that the reference almost certainly comes from a recently published, and secret, CIA analysis titled "Chaosistan" (not "Chaostan"). Prepared by a "red team" of CIA analysts, the document, says one official, picks apart conventional analyses of the war and explains how forces inside Afghanistan—from hostile ethnic groups to intrusive neighbors to societal damage caused by past Taliban rule—work against the notions of a central Afghan government. The paper is not quite the policy proposal McChrystal implied it was, say the officials, since intelligence analysts don't generally recommend policy options.

After NEWSWEEK pointed out the existence of the CIA document to McChrystal's office, an assistant to the general admitted that he had originally provided information about the Maybury Web posting following a Google search—but later determined it was more likely that the general "used an unclassified term from an official paper." While declining to confirm the existence of the classified CIA paper, Paul Gimigliano, a CIA spokesman, says: "One function of intelligence agencies, including the CIA, is to provoke thought by laying out contrary views and alternative scenarios."
Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Anonymous (October 21, 2009 at 7:52 AM)

In a previous post we wrote that just as he did 129 times when he was a senator, Barack Obama has once again chosen to be nothing more than "present," this time choosing to sit back and wait on a decision to sent much needed troops and resources to Afghanistan.

Report Abuse
Posted By: nana4 (October 20, 2009 at 6:10 PM)

Isaiah, I think anyone who eats one meal a day and exercises, is obsessed.  In my opinion, I am not surprised to hear that, consider it just another symptom, if you will.  Rumors about his role in Tillman's death just support my "instincts".  I just am not at all "comfortable" with him.  He seems ready, willing, and able, to be enlisted, if not lead, all kinds of "insurgencies" and I consider him "not right".  There is no justification for the attention he has garnered for himself with his "speaking tour".  If he were a "real" General, he would seize his position to say all he needs to say to the appropriate people and await the outcome.  I do not feel "safe" with him.

Let us see how this unfolds.....

Report Abuse
Posted By: BOFORCE (October 20, 2009 at 2:12 AM)

America is in Afghanistan not for welfare or to install democracy..America is there to control the oil and trade route of central asian markets of the future...but the task proved a long haul and difficult and now America is in deep deep *** after 7 years of Afghanistan invasion..losing money and men.General McChrystal is definitely a bad choice for coducting Afghan war....he is expert in short term covert operations...kiddnaping..assasinations....tortures...he is not suitable for long term Afghan war.......Afghanistan war is total mismanagement of men and money....even the ILLUMINATI philosophy of ORDO AB CHAO is failing in Afghanistan.

Report Abuse
Show All Comments (23) »