Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com

Declassified

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Monday, October 26, 2009 11:43 AM

DEA Agents Die in Afghanistan Helicopter Crash

Michael Isikoff

Three U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents were killed on a U.S. military helicopter that crashed in western Afghanistan yesterday during a counternarcotics mission, according to two law-enforcement sources who asked not to be identified.

The deaths of the three federal drug agents—along with seven U.S. members of the military on the flight—underscored the sharp escalation in the DEA's presence in Afghanistan in recent months as NATO forces make fighting the drug trade a major focus in their war against the Taliban.

The three agents were the first from DEA to lose their lives in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion. All three were described as veteran agents; their identities won't be released until officials have a chance to notify the families. "This is tough," said one DEA veteran. "It's a small agency that's like a close-knit family."

Advertisement

The deaths—on what turned out to be an exceptionally bloody day for U.S. forces, with 14 people killed overall on Sunday—are also certain to highlight the mounting risks in the U.S. fight in Afghanistan. The DEA agents were accompanied by U.S. Marine and U.S. Army special forces. Their chopper went down after a firefight, but one source said the crash appears to have been unrelated to hostile fire.

U.S. officials say they have found growing evidence of connections between the Taliban and the heroin trade, causing the U.S. military—working closely with the DEA—to step up raids on drug trafficking sites. DEA officials recently confirmed that the agency's own presence in Afghanistan has increased sharply, from 13 agents to about 80.

Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: DePetris (October 26, 2009 at 11:01 PM)

Ever since the DEA teamed up with the U.S. Military, I have often questioned whether diminishing the drug-trade in Afghanistan is the best precursor to stability and development.  U.S. officials understand that 90 percent of the world's opium originates in the Afghan countryside; that all-too addictive drug that ruins the very fabrics of society.  Likewise, drug cartels and drug traffickers are heavily connected to the Taliban, providing the necessary funds to continue the insurgency's operations in Afghanistan.  Based solely on these two facts, it would appear that the United States is doing the right thing with respect to illegal narcotics.  

However valid counter-narcotic campaigns are, the U.S. Military- as well as the State Department- must quickly provide an alternative to the production and sale of opium and heroin.  Destroying the drug trade in the United States is one thing...annihilating it in Afghanistan is something completely different.  In the western community, drug-dealing is simply viewed as an illegal and unnecessary endeavor; in Afghanistan, drug-dealing is the primary source of income for families.  Wiping out 90 percent of the trade may actually come back to bite the U.S in the long-run., for a whole host of new-recruits would be drawn to the Taliban cause  through feelings of desperation and economic hardship.

-Daniel R. DePetris

http://depetris.wordpress.com


Posted By: Anonymous (October 26, 2009 at 8:46 PM)

PingBack from http://slush.beanyblogger.com/?p=1159


Posted By: DePetris (October 26, 2009 at 4:05 PM)

Ever since the DEA teamed up with the U.S. Military, I have often questioned whether diminishing the drug-trade in Afghanistan will produce even more stability.  As U.S. officials already understand, 90 percent of the world's opium originates in the Afghan countryside; that all-too addicted drug that ruins the very fabrics of society.  Likewise, drug cartels and drug traffickers are heavily connected to the Taliban, providing the necessary funds to continue the insurgency's operations in Afghanistan.  Based solely on these two facts, it would appear that the United States is doing the right thing with respect to illegal narcotics.  

However valid counter-narcotic campaigns are, the U.S. Military- as well as the State Department- must quickly provide an alternative to the production and sale of opium and heroin.  Destroying the drug trade in the United States is one thing...annihilating it in Afghanistan is something completely different.  In the western community, drug-dealing is simply viewed as an illegal and unnecessary endeavor; in Afghanistan, drug-dealing is the primary source of income for families.  Wiping out 90 percent of the trade may actually come back to bite the U.S in the long-run., for a whole host of new-recruits would be drawn to the Taliban cause  through feelings of desperation and economic hardship.

-Daniel R. DePetris

http://depetris.wordpress.com