Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Sunday, August 17, 2008 1:59 PM

Climate: Winners and Losers

Sharon Begley

Memo to Gov. Schwarzenegger: you are right to make California a leader in the fight to control global warming. If a new study is right, your state is going to get hammered more than any other in the country as the climate changes. Droughts? Wildfires? Yes, yes and more yes.

 

One reason climate change doesn’t get people as fired up as, say, $4 gasoline is that its worst impacts lie years in the future, and will hit different regions differently. Alaskan ports that used to be ice-locked for most of the year can now be used for more weeks before and after the summer’s temperature peak than was ever possible, for instance. It’s easy for people, who have ostrich-like tendencies anyway, to convince themselves that their region will make out just fine—maybe even enjoy milder winters.

Advertisement

 

And they may be right. A new study, which will be published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, projects how seriously global warming will affect different areas of the United States and Mexico. Look for yourself, but the bottom line is that southern California, northern Mexico and western Texas will be the climate-change hotspots in coming decades, the scientists, led by Purdue University’s Noah S. Diffenbaugh, conclude.

 

“One interesting and surprising result is that we see the same hotspot patterns even at lower greenhouse gas concentrations," says Diffenbaugh. "This suggests that we may be able to see these hotspots emerging already.”

 

And the regions most likely to get off easy? Florida’s panhandle and the Atlantic coast from Florida to Maryland. So people there can go right on denying the reality of anthropogenic climate change.
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: pumapurr (August 20, 2008 at 3:26 PM)

Thanks for your time misterharban. I enjoyed reading all of your opinions and who knows if I won't be influenced by them?

cheers,

-pumapurr


Posted By: misterharban (August 20, 2008 at 1:55 PM)

Pumapurr;

You've said it all.

Good luck to you and the world as you continue to breed and feed.

Sorry, Darwin -- you were wrong.


Posted By: pumapurr (August 20, 2008 at 10:05 AM)

> Posted By: misterharban (August 20, 2008 at 1:20 AM)

> Jesus pumapurr, I'm sorry I wasted any time responding

> to you.  You are truly an idiot.

Please don't quote my wife without permission.

> I spent my life exploring for and developing conventional

> and alternative energy sources including your precious tar

> sands.  I have forgotten more about energy economics than

> you will ever know.  

Aye, that's as may be. But you miss the forest for the trees. Lots of "experts" do.

>And I have been able to contribute both

> personally and commercially to reducing, in a small way,

> carbon emissions in ways which also saved myself and others

> money without having to "off" anybody.

And I save money by shopping at Walmart, so we're even. But, don't do us any favors. The world goes on quite the same with or without misterharban and his "contributions". Let's say you had never been born. And then we put that misterhaben-free Earth side-by-side with the one we have now. Let's have a double-blind comparison of these two Earths... hmmm... seems to be impossible to say which is which. Maybe you, and only you, could tell?

>

> We consume more of every natural resource per capita than

> human beings at any time in history of the world.  Period

And that's a good thing. For the majority of the world consuming=happiness. My point is that we do it more efficiently and cleaner. Or would you like to go back to the technologies of the past centuries and try to support the present population? Very expensive and dirty. Very efficient and clean now and lots of enjoyable consuming.  Consumption is what life is about.  Good god, Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" must read as a tragedy to you: "Why, Scrooge could had picked a turkey that was 13% smaller!  The waste! The horror of it all! As for that Fezziwig, he's truly an idiot. Everyone stop dancing! Stop I say! Put that carbon cake down and stop breathing so much."   Now, that's your true contribution to this world.   Calling all angels!

>

> As for the price of gas, I have enough money that I frankly

> don't care what it costs.  I have generally chosen,

> however, to use it efficiently so I could see and do more

> and consume less. And I likely have seen and done more than

> you, unless you are very, very lucky.  If you want to waste

> gasoline I would still recommend an economical car and

> taking the gasoline you save, pour it on your children and

> watch them burn.  You will be doing Darwin and the world a

> favor

Just for that  remark, I'm going to have another child! And she will have lots more too, and so on, and so on.  So many more carbon footprints to make. So little time. You can't beat us misterharbon!

>and, after all, what difference does it make to you

> anyway -- sooner or later chaos will kill all of us.

Exactly, so enjoy it - and don't worry about it. Not one bit.

> And I can only assume that you can assure us that

> temperatures were higher than they are now when the

> dinosaurs roamed from personal experience and observation.

No, from reading things like this:

"At the peak of the Mesozoic, there were no polar ice caps, and sea levels are estimated to have been from 100 to 250 meters (300 to 800 ft) higher than they are today. The planet's temperature was also much more uniform, with only 25 °C (45 °F) separating average polar temperatures from those at the equator. On average, atmospheric temperatures were also much warmer; the poles, for example, were 50 °C (90 °F) warmer than today. The atmosphere's composition during the Mesozoic was vastly different as well. Carbon dioxide levels were up to 12 times higher than today's levels..."

> You might best be served by pulling your dinosaur head out

> of your reptilian rear and consider that there may be a

> middle ground in these matters.

I do, but you must understand your "middle ground" differs from lots of other people's "middle grounds". Yours is not any holier ground. And I like the dinosaur joke- although avian rear would have been more correct.