Sharon Begley
|
Nov 21, 2008 02:05 PM
Sir Ghillean (Iain) T. Prance,
the eminent botanist who served as director of Britain’s Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew, from 1988 to 1999, was in New York this week to receive
the Gold Medal of The New York Botanical Garden for his contributions to plant science. The award is given infrequently; the last recipient was Edward O. Wilson, in 2002.
Sir Ghillean
has done research across the world, including the Amazon, where he has
witnessed dramatic changes over 40 years. “I went to Suriname in 1963
and Brazil in 1964, and there was very little damage to the
rainforest,” he told me. “But by the 70s they had built a highway
across the Amazon, then colonization followed, with cattle ranching in
the 1980s and now soybean farming. We’ve lost 23% of the Brazilian
Amazon rainforest, but there is still a lot to fight for.”
I asked him
what we’ve learned about what works to preserve rainforest and what
doesn’t. “Sustainable forestry on the whole hasn’t lived up to its
promise,” he said. “Sustainable use is possible, but less than 1% of
development in the Amazon is truly sustainable.” The only real hope he
sees is for wealthy nations to step up and pay nations with significant
remaining rainforest to keep it intact, something Guyana has asked the
world to do for its rainforest, as I blogged about last May.
He is
pessimistic about how the environment will fare in a global recession,
warning that “a global economic downturn will be disastrous for the
environment. It costs money to preserve rainforest, and when you have
people to feed countries make that [basic human needs] their priority.”
Here’s my question: how come we didn’t do more when the world was flush
with cash?
More