Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, December 05, 2008 2:52 PM

To Stay Alive and Healthy, Head for the Border

Sharon Begley

What’s wrong with this picture? Americans’ health has failed to improve for the fourth year in a row, as America’s Health Rankings, released earlier this week, reports. Yet the country spends more than $2 trillion a year (one-sixth of our total economic output) on health care, more per person than any other nation.

We’ve all read how a big chunk of the nation’s health dollars go for insurers’ administrative costs, drug companies’ marketing and advertising, and other things that do exactly zero to keep people healthy and alive. But in a refreshingly direct analysis, experts led by neurologist Marc Nuwer of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA argue that the problem with our health-care system is that we persist in thinking like Americans. As they explain in two papers in the current issue of the journal Neurology, we “prize individual choice and resist limiting care. We believe that if doctors can treat very ill patients aggressively and keep every moment of people in the last stages of life under medical care, than they should. We choose to hold these values. Consequently, we choose to have a more expensive system than Europe or Canada”—and one that does not keep us healthier or alive longer.

First, the sobering findings of the Health Rankings, which are based on 22 health measures:

Advertisement
  • The prevalence of obesity has more than doubled in the last 19 years.
    The U.S. is 28th in healthy life expectancy at 69 years. In Japan it’s 75.
  • The U.S. has the worst mortality rate from treatable conditions of 18 other industrialized countries. That’s four spots worse than 5 years ago. In other words, get sick here and you’re more likely to die than you are in Canada, France, Britain and 15 other countries. Our mortality rate after age 75 is 50 percent higher than in France, Japan, Spain, Italy, Canada and Australia. In 1997, the U.S. ranked 15th in this mortality rate. Since then, Finland, Portugal, United Kingdom and Ireland have passed us.
  • The U.S. is 20th of 21 developed nations for child well-being, reflecting high infant mortality rates, a high percentage of low-birth-weight infants, and a low rate of immunizations.
  • The U.S. health care system performance is worse than that of Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom—though we spend twice as much as these countries per person on health care.

“These statistics indicate that what we are doing as a nation is not working,” said Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. “We know improvement is possible because other nation’s have achieved far better health outcomes at less cost, indicating that we, too, can do the same.”

Earlier this year I wrote that this pablum our political and business leaders keep feeding us about how the American health-care system is “the best in the world” (an argument that special interests have long used to block health-care and health-insurance reform) is completely bogus. The U.S., as I wrote then, is “well behind other developed countries on measures from cancer survival to diabetes care that cannot entirely be blamed on the rich-poor or insured-uninsured gulf.” These data underline that.

But back to Marc Nuwer’s diagnosis. The UCLA neurologist and his colleagues make these points:

  • 31 percent of what we spend on health “care” goes toward administration. “We push a lot of paper,” says Nuwer. “We spend twice as much as Canada, which has a more streamlined healthcare system that demands doctors complete less paperwork.”
  • 10 percent of what we spend goes to defensive medicine, such as expensive tests ordered by doctors afraid of missing anything, however unlikely. “Doctors don’t want to be accused in court of a delayed diagnosis, so they bend over backwards to find something, even if it’s a rare possibility, in order to cover themselves,” says Nuwer. I have to add that much of this is driven by patients and their families who have no understanding that the test will not lead to anything actionable. Hint: when your doc orders a test, ask if the results will tell her something about how to treat you that she doesn’t already know.

Part of the problem, says Nuwer, is that doctors are oblivious to the price of whatever they’re prescribing. “Does a fancy electric wheelchair cost $500 or $50,000?” he asks. “Most doctors have no clue. We need to give physicians feedback about the dollar signs behind their orders.”

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Carolyn215 (December 7, 2008 at 1:15 PM)

We need to change the way that doctors are reimbursed.  Under the current system, they are paid only for performing procedures, so they perform alot of unnecessary ones in order to overcharge..  The standard of care would change dramatically if their compensation was based  upon actual resutls achieved with their treatments.  Patients also need to accept more responsiblity for their own heath.   Likewise, doctors need to accept their patients as partners in makiing medical decisions and get off of their ego trips.    Somebody mentioned accupuncture as cost- effective treatment for many comditions but alot of MDs really bristle at the mere mention of non-conventional/natural  healing modalities that rely on they bodys own healing wisdom, such as accupuncture, chiropractic, chinese medicine, homeopathy, energy medicine, and dismiss these as "quackery" .    Their emphasis on drugs and surgery gives them the illusion of control over the patients healing process, while, in reality, the patient might be healing in spite of what they have done, rather than because of what they did.


Posted By: RomanUrbanczyk (December 6, 2008 at 10:11 PM)

Interesting you would suggest this...the state of Texas has limited the malpractise awards a few years ago. Now the cost of malpractise insurance has dropped to such a degree that hospitals in Texas are increasing their capital expenditures for new equipment and upgrading physical facilities. We need to be aware that healthcare funding is more and more a zero sum game.


Posted By: user/provider (December 6, 2008 at 10:04 PM)

The scary thing about "defensive medicine" is that the physician is often not fully aware that their practice patterns have changed and that becomes the new standard of care. I don't think this is easily measured. The legal system is not the appropriate forum for deciding standard of care and quality issues.  Malpractice does not really address the issue of quality and is more focused on bad outcomes which may or may not be the result of negligence.  These people often need financial support, but the adversarial legal system just sucks a significant amount of those dollars away from medical care.  I think we would all be bettered served by a system that monitors quality and deals with true malpractice but also compensates people with bad outcomes.  This would reduce health care costs bec ause the standard of care would be established up front and not by a hired gun who has the luxury of second guessing once the diagnosis is known.