Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:29 PM

Genes and Second-Hand Smoke

Sharon Begley

If you’re one of those people who read about the toxic effects of environmental pollutants or diet and say, bulls***: I know lots of people who breathed or drank or ate that so-called pollutant and are just fine, then toxicogenomics is for you. This young field examines interactions between genes and environment, identifying DNA variants that make one person develop asthma from air pollutants while another breathes free, for instance, or that make one person develop cancer from cigarettes while another smokes three packs a day for 70 years with nary a shadow on his lung x-ray. For a sense of what the field is doing, check out the “environmental genetics” group at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (the site has a link to publications).

 

One of the most divisive issues when it comes to pollutants and health is second-hand smoke. Across the population, passive smoking (as it’s also called) raises the risk of heart disease, lung cancer and other things you really should avoid. But not everyone suffers ill effects. A new study suggests why. A variation within a single gene can determine how susceptible children will be to second-hand smoke, even in utero, conclude scientists led by Carrie Breton and Frank Gilliland of the University of Southern California

Advertisement

 

For the study, published in the April issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the researchers examined a family of genes called glutathione-s transferase (GST) genes which defend cells against damage by free radicals, which are abundant in cigarette smoke. The genes come in several variants, three of which had a significant effect on lung function in the 2,100 fourth graders in the study.

 

One of the variants, present in 30 to 35 percent of the white population, is correlated with poorer lung function and more susceptibility to respiratory damage if mom smoked during pregnancy. Since the GST genes help detoxify free radicals, including those in cigarette smoke, says Breton, “we speculate that the patterns of genetic variation we investigated may alter this process, thereby reducing the lung’s ability to detoxify harmful agents and causing a cascade of other events that promote inflammation, bronchial constriction, airway hyper-responsiveness and asthma-like symptoms.”

 

I can see it now: have your newborn’s genetic profile determined, and if she carries the protective form of the GST family of genes you can puff away without fear that she’ll be injured by your second-hand smoke.
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Retiree60 (March 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM)

Remember when California illegalized cigarettes in most places on the same ballot where they legalized marijuana? Now there's a big push to legalize all the currently illegal hard drugs, mostly so they can be taxed. I lost respect for the whole anti-smoking lobby that day California showed its true colors. Health has nothing to do with their arguments. There was this one woman at work, a non-smoker, who would stand just outside the designated smoking area and cough up a storm. That's just dumb.  I've seen some of you non-smokers smoking a joint at a party and then complaining about smokers the next day.


Posted By: edenri (March 26, 2009 at 4:55 PM)

I was a smoker for 10 years before I quit.  I hung around with many smokers over the years.  I don't think I ever met one that was inconsiderate to non smokers.  If around non smokers they always stayed away.  During those 10 years I also hung around with many non smokers, they can be very inconsiderate towards smokers however.


Posted By: gaborten (March 26, 2009 at 4:35 PM)

Posted By: edenri (March 26, 2009 at 12:32 PM)

@white trash.......yes I'm sure the smoke bothers you but to tell people what to do thats just ridiculous.  

WE ALL LIVE BY RULES, RULES TO PROTECT US.  IT IS NOT RIDICULOUS IN A PUBLIC PLACE, UNLIKE YOUR HOME - SMOKE ALL YOU WANT THERE.  CHILDREN, HOWEVER SHOULD BE, MUST BE PROTECTED FROM SMOKE.

If your not considerate to the smokers, no I'm not one, then why in the world would they want to be considerate to you?

CONSIDERATE OF SMOKERS????  I CAN'T CATCH A BREATH WHEN I LEAVE MY HOUSE.  SMOKERS ARE EVERYWHERE, ESPECIALLY AT JUST OUTSIDE OF EVERY RETAIL PLACE, WHICH MAKES ENTERING AN EXITING (AND WITHIN 20 FT INSIDE)  OBNOXIOUS TO TRY TO CATCH A BREATH.  EVEN OUTDOORS, WALKING ANYWHERE - IT BLOWS RIGHT IN A PERSON'S FACE!  

Your taking in just as much toxins sitting in traffic.  Sit a room with a bunch of smokers and you'll come out still alive.  Sit in a room with a bunch of cars and you won't walk out alive.

DON'T CARE TO BE SUBJECTED TO THAT CRAPPY AIR - OR CIGARETTE SMOKE.  BOTH ARE OUTRAGEOUS.  SOMEONE SMOKING IS NOT AS TOXIC AS A CAR - THAT'S TOUGH MATH!!!  DO YOU WANT TO DIE IMMEDIATELY, OR JUST OVER TIME?  BREATHING IN SMOKE IS INDESCRIBABLE.  WHEN I WAS YOUNG AND SUBJECTED TO IT CONSTANTLY IT I DESCRIBED IT AS TRYING TO SWALLOW CARPET.  THE OLDER I GET, THE HARDER IT IS TO BREATHE IT IN FOR EVEN A MOMENT.  I GET EXTREMELY NAUSEATED, LITERALLY, FROM BREATHING IT IN.  KNOWING THAT PEOPLE HAVE SUCH SENSITIVITIES TO THIS STUFF, WHY DO SMOKERS WANT TO BOMBARD FOLKS WITH THE NASTY, TOXIC AIR THAT COMES WITH IT?  YOU ARE PUSHING THAT CRAP ON OTHERS.  YOUR RIGHT TO SMOKE ENDS AT MY NOSE/LUNGS!!!!

Smokers really do need to be considerate of non smokers, but they do have a choice like you do, and it should be respected.

WHAT???!!!!