<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.newsweek.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Eat Cereal, Have Boys? On Second Thought . . . </title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/labnotes/archive/2009/01/14/eat-cereal-have-boys-on-second-thought.aspx</link><description>When scientists in England reported last April that what a woman eats around the time she conceives can affect whether she has a boy or a girl —the headline-making finding of the study, titled “You Are What Your Mother Eats,” was that women who ate breakfast</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)</generator><item><title>re: Eat Cereal, Have Boys? On Second Thought . . . </title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/labnotes/archive/2009/01/14/eat-cereal-have-boys-on-second-thought.aspx#879106</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:40:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:879106</guid><dc:creator>StatManXX</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ioannidis published two insturctive papers in 2005. In JAMA, he noted that randomized clinical trials replicated around 80% of the time. Observational studies (the Mathews et al. study is ovservational) failed to replicate ~80% of the time. A consumer should not believe a claim from an observation study until it is replicate. Who funds these studies anyway?&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Lab Notes</category></item></channel></rss>