
1UP Network editorial director Dan Hsu
Two
weeks ago, Ziff-Davis' 1UP Network, which publishes the magazines EGM,
Games For Windows: The Official Magazine and 1UP.com announced that it
had reorganized its editorial group around three silos--Videogames, PC
Games and Video--spanning both print and online. Simultaneously, the
company revealed that its review scale would shift from its familiar
ten point scale to letter grades, a la Entertainment Weekly. To get a
better understanding of the changes that were afoot, we pinged 1UP
Network editorial director Dan "Shoe" Hsu with a few questions over email, which
he graciously took time to answer--but only after he finished closing the next issue of EGM. Now that's dedication. Here's what Hsu had to say.
What were the main reasons behind the recently announced reorganization of the 1UP Network? When do they go into effect?
We
integrated the print and online teams because we recognized this is the
direction that media's going. It's no longer just about print or just
about online; it's about both. This reorganization lets us tackle our
editorial duties more efficiently, because all our editors are
constantly working in both print and online. We really think our
readers will notice and appreciate this move, too, because it will
translate into better, more well-rounded coverage from us.
Presumably,
Jeff Green, who was just named the 1UP Network's editor-in-chief for PC
games, will remain the editor-in-chief of Games For Windows magazine.
But the press release wasn't clear about whether Jeff's 1UP Network
counterpart for videogames, James Mielke, will also be the
editor-in-chief of the corresponding magazine, EGM. Is Mielke now in
charge of EGM, or are you still the editor-in-chief?
Jeff
Green is the editor-in-chief, PC games, so he's running Games For
Windows: The Official Magazine as well as the PC coverage on our online
properties. James Mielke is Jeff's videogame/console counterpart, so
yup, he's the editor-in-chief of EGM (as well as the console side of
our online sites). I'm now full-time editorial director for the 1UP
Network.
Over the past few years, video has moved from the
periphery to the center of Ziff-Davis videogame coverage. You've also
got a number of popular and/or influential podcasts, like 1UP Yours and
the Games For Windows podcast. What plans do you have going forward for
video and audio under this new management structure?
You just wait and see! ;)
There's
no news editor listed in the reorganization. Is that because former
news editor Patrick Klepek just left to join MTV News and you've yet to
replace him, or is it because the news editor function is not as high
up on the food chain in the new 1UP Network as video, previews and
reviews? Going forward, will a single high level editor oversee news
for the entire 1UP Network, or do you have something else in mind?
It's
for the first reason that you stated--our last news editor recently
went mainstream on us, joining MTV News, so we're in the process of
hiring his replacement. This news editor will oversee our news coverage
for the entire 1UP Network.
What was the reasoning behind the
switch to letter grades for reviews? Are you concerned that gamers
who've been accustomed to numerical scores, which are widely deployed
across multiple outlets including the now-industry standard Metacritic
and Gamerankings scores, will be confused or put off by your new system?
We
switched to letter grades because we felt that it'd be more universally
understood than our previous numeric scale. You see, in the past, we
insisted on using the entire 0-10 range, with 5 being in the middle,
rather than an "8-10 is good, everything below that is bad" scale most
other outlets seem to use. But just because we insisted on it didn't
mean all our readers bought into it. So while a 7 meant "not bad, still
good" to us, it looked like it was on the verge of failing to some in
our audience. We tried it for a few years and decided it wasn't
working, so we switched to a letter-grading scale that we knew would be
crystal clear to everyone.
The press release states that all
previous reviews will be converted from numerical scores to letter
grades; can you share with us the conversion chart, i.e. which letter
grades will correspond to which review scores on a ten-point scale?
We're
not publicizing the conversion scale because we want our readers to go
with our new scoring system and not be constantly translating the new
letters back to our old scores. We also don't want our reviewers to be
thinking about how they translate. It's just easier for us to have
everyone move forward and accept the new ratings. But most people can
figure it out. Our old "average" in the 5 range roughly translates to
the C letter grades (with plusses and minuses), for example.