Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
  • Final Thoughts: The Devil and Bill Self

    Mark Coatney | Apr 8, 2008 10:49 AM

    Here's the story I had begun, when Kansas led by 3 midway through the first half: "If it comes down to the last-second shot, Kansas is in trouble. This team plays hard, and they like each other, and they're generous to a fault. But there's really nobody on that team, except maybe Mario Chalmers, who has the personality and the skills to both want to take the last shot and to actually hit it."

    Funny how things work out.

    Also funny how both teams played very well, and according to type. Memphis pressured the ball, drove to the basket, hit the midrange jumper and missed clutch free throws; Kansas aggressively defended the perimeter and pounded the ball inside. There were a few outliers—play that game a hundred times more and Derrick Rose is more of an offensive threat; play it a hundred times more and Kansas shoots better than 3 of 12 threes (though, go figure: before Sherron Collins and Chalmers hit those last two three-pointers, Kansas was shooting 1-10; had Kansas lost, we all would have been point to this as one of the reasons why).

    Since we've been numbers geeks here all along, we'd like to point out that the Memphis collapse wasn't all that bad; according to the Bill James lead calculator, a 9 point lead with a little over two minutes left to play is only 32 percent safe. Interestingly, this is the same degree of confidence Kansas had when they were up 40-12 with 27 minutes left to play against North Carolina. Of course, Kansas closed that one out.

    There is the free throw issue, of course, and though everyone is going to make a lot of noise about how Calipari shouldn't have dismissed his team's poor shooting so lightly, I'm inclined to agree with those who believe free throws have very little to do with winning. Having a team that shoots a high percentage from the line is nice to have, of course, but it's a far less valuable skill than, say, offensive rebounding, which gets your team the most precious commodity in the game—more possessions. And though the misses were easy to point to as the reason for the Memphis collapse, far more important was allowing Kansas to steal the inbounds pass with under two minutes left to play; Collins hit a 3 that brought the score to 60-56.

    But enough rehashing. As they say in Bull Durham, the moment's over, and the first midnight scrimmage is only six months away. The big question facing Bill Self now comes in the form of the Devil Boone Pickens with an offer of, well it's an obscene amount of money, really, to coach Oklahoma State, which just happens to be Self's alma mater. Will Self take it? When Devin asked me that last night, I made a not-very-convincing-even-to-myself argument that Bill Self would never leave the greatest job in college basketball. And there are already plenty of columnists saying he should stay put (thanks, Gene Wojciechowski). Still, I think Devin's right. It's a chance to go home, to a school that does have a pretty good basketball tradition of its own (even though their last title came in, ahem, 1946). And, oh yeah, there's maybe Ten. Million. Dollars. 

    So maybe he's gone. And really, with no hard feelings; Self is by all accounts a great guy, and he's run a great program at KU.  Still, what shall it profit a team, if it shall gain the whole world, and lose its own coach? Well, hundreds of thousands in merchandise sales, etc. for one thing. A higher national profile. And, maybe a shot at the next up-and-coming coach. You think Mark Turgeon's available?

    And now, in our own personal One Shining Moment, I must thank you both for a very nice three weeks of watching and writing about basketball. And I'm not just saying that because my team won. Truly, this is the most wonderful time of the year, made even better with such smart writers to talk it over with. See you all at Midnight Madness.

    More
  • Did Kansas Win a Title and Lose a Coach?

    Devin Gordon | Apr 8, 2008 09:34 AM
    I think its only fitting that we let Coatney have the last word, assuming he's come down from that cloud yet. He's waited a long time for this, and his Jayhawks took the title in the most electrifying way. There's no such thing as a crummy national championship, but no one wants to win one in a garbage game like, say, the Maryland-Indiana slopfest about five years ago. This was a skilled, thrilling game, with superb players all over the court, and the kind of finish you can't script. I'd like to second Starr's compliment of the referees and their wise decision to swallow their whistles. As I watched it, I thought often that the game was being called like an NBA game--and that it was much better for it. The players decided this one, loud and clear.

    But now all the speculation will turn to the coaches--or one coach, at least. When I sent Coatney a congratulatory e-mail last night, I told him that I thought he'd won a title but probably lost a coach. As everyone reading this surely knows, Bill Self is being wooed by his alma mater, Oklahoma State, with buckets of money. Coatney thinks he'll resist the lure, but I seriously doubt it. At the risk of being a cynic, OSU is simply offering too much money to walk away from--a reported $4 million per year with a $6 million bonus. (He makes just over $1 million per with Kansas.) I'm sure KU will sweeten his deal, but not /that/ much. And here's why I'm so convinced Self will take the dough: it wouldn't be a betrayal. It would, in fact, be an act of loyalty to both sides. He can cry "mission accomplished" for Kansas--he got them their title--and he can return home without leaving any unfinished business and without having to explain why on Earth he would do it. And though it didn't stop Billy Donovan, the thought will surely cross Self's mind about what kind of KU team hed be returning to. Its also worth saying that $10 million is an insane amount of money, and I'm not sure any of us--as pure and noble as we are--could walk away from it. Especially if we were being offered that money to come home.

    Coatney, I don't think anything can dim your day today. But do you really think Self will be your coach next year? Or is that just the champagne talking?

  • Advertisement
  • At Last, One Great Game

    Mark Starr | Apr 8, 2008 09:32 AM
    When you don't, as I didn't, have a horse in the race, the game itself--good or bad--becomes the only concern. And last night's NCAA basketball final was everything a fan could have hoped for. Kudos to both Kansas and Memphis for a spirited, stylish sprint of a game, good enough to virtually erase the memory of what had been a disappointing, often sluggish tournament.

    But I give every bit as much credit to the referees, who managed one of the toughest tricks in officiating: to sit on their whistles and let the kids play without ever letting the physical play get out of hand. There were only 35 fouls whistled, a number of those deliberate fouls by Kansas in the end game, and 34 free throws taken in a game with an extra period. Thus the refs, as much as the players, contributed to the breakneck pace of the play.

    I had been thinking about end-game situations since the previous evening's women's semi-finals, when, with 7.1 seconds remaining, Tennessee raced the length of the court to score the game-winner and squeak by LSU 47-46. (Tennessee will play Stanford for the title tonight). There was no surprise in their last-second approach. Tennessee got the ball in the hands of its superstar Candace Parker who raced the length of the court with only the meagrest harassment. Only when Parker reached the baseline did every LSU player jump out at her, leaving a Tennessee player all alone under the basket. Parker found her with a perfect pass and, even after she blew the layup, another Volunteer was there to rebound and put the ball up and in with less than a second left in the game.

    It was hardly an unfamiliar ending in tournament basketball--with prominent memories of Danny Ainge and Tyus Edney racing end-to-end in the final seconds and scoring winning buckets for Brigham Young and UCLA respectively. I always wonder in such games how, particularly when a team has struggled to score all night long as Tennessee had, can they possibly get two unmolested layups in the final seconds. And this was after LSU coach Van Chancellor had a timeout to set up his defense. It seemed obvious to me that Parker should have been double-teamed in the backcourt and forced to give up the ball, requiring her less skilled teammates to execute perfectly in the final seconds. The result might have been the same, but it would have certainly come harder.

    So I was already obsessing about end-games when we had another classic situation in the men's final. (A pause here to note my one and only prescient comment before the tournament: that Memphis didn't shoot free throws well enough to win this tournament.) A team, in this case Kansas, needs a three-pointer to tie in the final seconds and send the game into overtime. I've come to believe that, at least in the college ranks (and maybe even in the pros), the trailing team should never get to take that shot unmolested. The defenders should be out on the three-point line ready to foul--even if that means allowing a player to get to the line for three free throws and a chance to tie the game. I am convinced that most college players have a far better chance of hitting the three-pointer in rhythm than they do of making three consecutive free throws with the game on the line.
    More