Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

Why It Matters

Full Post
Posted Sunday, March 30, 2008 7:24 PM

Macedonia and Greece, Or How I Got Involved in a Diplomatic Row

Ginanne Brownell

Advertisement

I was settling in for an evening with friends on Friday night when my mobile rang.  "Ms. Brownell, this is the Greek Embassy in Washington," the caller informed me. "We wanted to talk with you about the interview you did with the foreign minister from FYROM."  My heart sank. I knew why he was calling, and that my relaxing Friday evening was not going to happen. 

FYROM (pronounced "Figh-Rahm") is the international shorthand for the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. There is a huge debate at the moment between Greece and its neighbor to the north. My interview (http://www.newsweek.com/id/129146) with the Macedonian foreign minister, it turns out, added fuel to an already flaming diplomatic fire. The Greek foreign minister now wanted to give me the Greek point of view, which he proceeded to do.

Afterwards I called a Greek friend of mine and told her the story. She did not assuage my fear that I had somehow contributed to a diplomatic incident. "Yeah, no kidding they're are mad and I think now there is no way they will agree on a name," she said. She was right: at meetings on Saturday, Greece rejected every name proposed, and now this week's NATO summit looks to be fraught. "I think your piece is the reason why they are pissed off," my Greek friend texted me on Saturday. "You have brought on a diplomatic deadlock." Of course, she was joking. I think.

Here, in full, is the Greek response:  

 

RESPONSE BY GREEK AMBASSADOR TO THE U.S.

TO THE INTERVIEW OF FOREIGN MINISTER MILOSOSKI

 

The Foreign Minister of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) invents non-existent minorities and resorts to nationalistic practices of the past in interpreting Greece's position on the enlargement of NATO and the invitation to his country to join the Alliance. ("What is in a Name?" - Newsweek Web exclusive, March 26, 2008).From the outset, regarding Mr. Miloskoski's claims on minorities, I should point out that "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones". 

Allow me to explain Greece's position on the enlargement of NATO to the Western Balkans that will be decided at next week's Summit meeting in Bucharest, Romania.

Greece, a member of NATO since 1952, has been a strong advocate of the integration of Southeastern Europe into the Euroatlantic Institutions. On the basis of this strategic choice, we support NATO's "open door" policy. An open door policy, however, must be based on the principles of good neighborly relations and allied solidarity.

Greece supports the enlargement of NATO in the Western Balkans, with the invitations to Croatia and Albania. Ιt is ready also to welcome the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), provided that our northern neighbor shifts from their nationalistic logic and agree to a mutually agreeable name for international use that differentiates the new Balkan state from the Greek province of Macedonia; a name that will not be a vehicle for propaganda and irredentism against a neighboring NATO member.

Athens has shown its good will towards Skopje in many ways. It has supported its neighbor, both politically and economically, ranking as the number one foreign investor in that country, with $1 billion invested capital that has generated 30,000 new jobs. Most recently, we went the extra mile, or rather the most important mile, when we expressed our readiness to agree to a composite name with a geographic qualifier. This is a major shift from Greece's initial position, which excluded any use of the term "Macedonia", in the name of our neighbor.

Contrary to Mr. Milososki's claims the name issue is not a bilateral one. It is an international issue, which concerns our broader region. Directly, or indirectly, it concerns NATO and the U.N. And, if not resolved now, it may fester to poison future generations, undermining stability and cooperation in the 21st century.

On this issue, we are not alone. 115 members of the U.S. Congress, from both parties, support House Resolution 356, expressing the "sense of the House of Representatives that FYROM should stop hostile activities and propaganda against Greece, and should work with the United Nations and Greece to find a mutually acceptable official name".

A similar resolution, S.R. 300, was introduced in the Senate by Senators Robert Menendez, Barrack Obama and Olympia Snowe.

Greece has called upon FYROM's leadership to act responsibly and show political courage and meet Greece half way. It will be a responsible move on the part of an aspiring candidate, a move that will win them a European future, a future of stability, peace and economic prosperity, based on the principles upon which NATO and the European Union are founded.

 

Alexandros P. Mallias

Ambassador of Greece to the United States

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Stergios (April 16, 2008 at 3:50 PM)

It is a lie when the FYROM politicians claim that their country does not have territorial claims against Greece.

In the following link you will see Mr. Nikola Gruevski, the Prime Minister of the FYROM, bowing to a monument on which a map of so-called "Greater Macedonia" has been glued. The map depicts about 25% of Greece's territory as "Macedonian". Please follow the link:

http://blog.antibaro.gr/?p=66

How would you feel if Mexican President Calderon bowed to map of Mexico prior to 1830, with the Mexican border reaching as far north as Wyoming?

And the crazy thing is that although Mexico did actually reach all the way to Wyoming up to 1830, NEVER in history was there a political entity as defined by "Greater Macedonia", and that the Greeks have always been a majority in what is now Greek Macedonia.

FYROMian claims are not irredentist.

It's not like there exists any sizeable "Macedonian" minority in Greece.

Many Slavs lived in Greece prior to 1919, but they defined themselves as Bulgarians, and they were exchanged with Bulgaria's Greeks after the signing of the Treaty of Neuilly in the few years to follow.

The so-called "ethnic Macedonians" in Greece today have all the freedoms one expects to enjoy in an advanced democracy such as Greece, including a political party of their own ("Rainbow")which only got something like 6,000 votes in the last elections for the European Parliament, a number that amounts to roughly 0.05% of Greece's total population and 0.25% of the population of Greek Macedonia.  


Posted By: xelen (April 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM)

Ms. Brownell, I do not know how instumental your interview was in flaming diplomatic fires but I can assure you that it managed to create a day-long migraine for one Greek Macedonian who had looked forward to a peaceful Saturday of surfing on the web!!!  The problem the foreign press, and specifically American press, has with this issue is they paint FYROM and Greece to be a modern day David and Goliath when in actuality Greece is David fighting against superpower Gotliaths (read:  US)  who want NATO expansion at all costs.  In Greece there is no doubt we will feel the effects of not caving in  to the US's pressure to admit FYROM.  The second problem with the media coverage of this issue is that the press insists on belittling the issue, all but calling Greece spoiled and paranoid.  The issue is far more serious than just who the descendents of Alexander the Great are.  The fact is, FYROM does have designs on Greek Macedonia.  One needs only to visit a handful of "macedonian" websites to encounter propaganda describing Greek Macedonia as "occupied" territory.  Milososki & many others say, "why, FYROM is a poor country of only 2 million- even if they wanted to they couldn't attack Greece."  To that I respond:  No one took Hitler seriously at first either.  What is a small, poor country today can be a powerful giant tomorrow, especially with well-placed friends.   Nor does the change in the FYROM constitution declaring no irrendentist claims on Greece convince me.  The multiple amendments to the US constitution proves that any constitution is a living organism which can be changed as needs develop.  I am glad the Greek side has spoken but I wish those in the position of informing the general population were more objective in their coverage of this issue.


Posted By: foteini (April 7, 2008 at 10:59 AM)

How can you speak about macedonian minority in northern Greece, when those who live there, as staying to the province of Macedonia, are macedonians? Minority is something minus, in the province of Macedonia everyone who lives there is a macedonian.

Are you confused? And how not be! When people of FYROM monopolize the term "macedonian", claiming that only they are macedonians, while Greece has a huge province called Macedonia, the birthplace of Alexander the Great and Bulgaria has also an area named "Pirin Macedonia". Who forbids the self determination of the other?

I think it is clear that this composite name is neseccary to avoid the confusion and the rows between the three countries(Greece, Bulgaria and FYROM).


 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Harmonix, creator of Rock Band and Guitar Hero, is changing videogames.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
CAMPAIGN 2008
republican gop convention periscope mccain

John McCain's choice to manage the GOP convention this summer is lobbyist Doug Goodyear, whose firm once represented Burma's repressive regime.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu