Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:40 PM

Would Michael Jackson Have Wanted Such a Big Funeral?

Joshua Alston

As is the case with any news story that elbows all the others out of the way, the media coverage of Michael Jackson’s death has begun to spawn a backlash. That’s understandable, given how short our attention spans are, but to those dreading the wall-to-wall coverage of Jackson’s memorial, I have a simple question: how are you not completely fascinated by this? What’s so captivating about the fallout from Jackson’s death isn’t the minutiae of how he died, but rather the uncomfortable questions that arise from the most private moment of a most public person. What is the right way to celebrate a life that belonged to everyone? How does one ensure that both Michael’s family, and the strangers who thought of him as family, get to bid him farewell in a respectful manner?

By day’s end, we’ll get alternate versions of the answers to these questions, but issues so fraught can never be addressed in a way that satisfies everyone. His funeral is a 17,500-person spectacle at the Staples Center in Los Angeles with a guest list that includes Jennifer Hudson, Mariah Carey, Stevie Wonder—and possibly a billion viewers worldwide. Obama’s inauguration is so six months ago. The where-were-you-when moment of 2009, if not the aughts, is the day when the King of Pop lay in repose in a basketball arena.

The grandeur of the memorial is both fitting and tragic. What Michael’s biggest fans and harshest critics seem to agree on is that whatever Michael became he became as a result of the constant scrutiny that began when he was a child and that will continue to stalk him long after his death. Whether or not he was addicted to painkillers is still being dissected, but it’s clear that Michael was always addicted to a drug that was clearly no good for him: megafame. It almost feels like the right thing to do would be to give him the respite that eluded him when he was living. But funerals are for the living more than they are for the dead, and it’s equally logical to magnify the attention to the end of what Socrates might have called the overexamined life. Fans, after all, feel like every album, every poster, every concert ticket and commemorative T shirt is like a share of stock they’ve bought, and when a celebrity dies, it’s time to cash in.

This is what Michael would have probably wanted anyway. After all, we are talking about the guy who once floated a 30-foot golden statue of his likeness down the Thames to promote a record. He didn’t do small, and he didn’t do modest. But what’s amazing about the tricky process of planning today’s memorial is that anyone had to guess his wishes at all. His ex-wife, Lisa Marie Presley, has said in recent interviews that Michael mused that he might end up like her father, Elvis, who also died young of heart failure. If it’s true that Michael was this aware of his mortality, why didn’t he more explicitly lay out details for how he wanted his death and burial handled? It’s the suddenness of Michael’s death that caught everyone by surprise, and it seems he wasn’t any more prepared for it than the rest of us. That’s to be expected from a boy who never really grew up.

Advertisement
Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: harlea5 (July 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM)

This is in responce to ToTheRight...If you were so close to him to know how much money he spent on "God knows what" why would you say anything like that. For you to feel so strongly and have all the knowledge of his spending habits, you have people thinking you must have been "butt buddies". And this comment is in NO WAY insinuating that ( Michael was a pedofile), just trying to get a point across to all the people out there that listen to the untruths that the media speads, and choose to believe that garbage!  I  believe we wil all be judged when we die (just as Michael did) and you will be...choose to just leave it alone, already. The poor man lost his life in an attempt to numb some of the pain this world put on him. And you have no clue what you are talking about. Maybe I don't either...but, it doesn't matter what you or I know, or think. It's between God and Michael!!! Please leave the poor soul alone, and let him Rest in Peace!  already!


Posted By: emmebb (July 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM)

The family should respect Katherine's burial wishes.  After all she is the one who gave birth to MJ and loved hom thru his career and life.  I agree with her, Neverland is out of the question.  MJ himself never went back. And that's exactly why that evil, evil-looking, controlling and greedy Joe Jackson wants to bury MJ at Neverland.  His twisted mind is giving him the satisfaction of tormenting MJ forever in a place that MJ did not want anymore. I believe MJ would have wanted a quiet small gathering that would not expose his kids to the greedy incompassionate media.

And definitivey  a Jehova Witness minister give the spritual good-bye speech.  I also think he would want his kids far away from that monster Joe Jackson.


Posted By: Progressive American (July 9, 2009 at 2:40 PM)

He was a gifted entertainer, who was also extremely weird.