Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, October 02, 2009 1:16 PM

Zombies Are Not the New Vampires: They Don't Suck

Sarah Ball


Have you heard? Zombies are the new vampires. First it was the hit literary mash-up, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Last month it was Jennifer's Body, the Diablo Cody-written zombie movie starring Megan Fox. This weekend, movie-goers flocked to Zombieland, which became the first surprise hit of the fall season (it opened at No. 1 with $25 million, according to studio estimates). Starz premieres Zombiemania later in the month, reviving all the old zombie classics (Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead, Day of the Dead and more). Apparently there's even a self-help book for zombies on the way, dispensing "advice and etiquette for the living dead."  Zombies zombies zombies.

Except, no.

As annoying and ceaseless as is the vampire bonanza, zombies will never supplant it.  The vampire obsession is rooted in sexual attraction. Robert Pattinson and Stephen Moyer turn people on. Something about the powdery pallor, the intelligent brow, the drowsing accent. A vampire is threatening enough to make a tryst forbidden, but human enough to engender loin-lust. His weapon is essentially a rough kiss. People are so pressed over vampires that they're actually buying drinkable blood.

No one's gonna buy bottled black-licorice barf because it oozes out of every zombie's mouth. Zombies aren't cute.  They're not landed aristocrats, gently loosening your corset stays while unbuttoning their Dracula pantaloons. They don't speak in the high-flown meter of the Romantic poets. They don't speak at all. They're nasty-ass monsters, tasked with removing your appendages and eating your intestinal tract amid the roiling chaos of the post-apocalypse.

And that's the beauty of them. The whole point of zombie movies is to celebrate counterculture in an openly hamhanded way. Take the geek-speak-y Zombieland. The entire middle section of the movie is a gloriously attenuated homage to Ghostbusters, complete with a cameo from Bill Murray (who admits, in a total non sequitur, that his life's chief regret is his voicework in Garfield). Russell Crowe gets hit with fat jokes. Babe is referenced. And because battling aggressive, black-gunk-oozing zombie gangs can be messy, Jesse Eisenberg turns to his three costars and asks, "You guys want some Purell?"

Not everybody likes this kind of thing. Zombieland reminds The New York Times' Manohla Dargis of the Holocaust, and therefore, to her, it's not funny. Its biggest fans will be demented former Blockbuster employees—the kind of unabashed nerds who welcome conjoined absurdism and gore. Zombies are the Goth theater kids; vampires are the hot popular crowd. Even the crap-purveyors at Oriental Trading Company agree with us. Twenty-one vampire items can be yours, including a 144-piece set of neon-colored fangs for $7.99.  Zombie swag amounts to eight measly items, such as wound tattoos. Tellingly, they're under the clearance banner.

And thank God for that. Because as much as we love 'em, we'd rather die a intestine-gobbling death than guzzle bottled zombie juice.

Advertisement
Tag(s): ,
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: theredhead15 (October 6, 2009 at 5:08 PM)

I shamelessly love zombies, and haven't ever taken to vampires. I think that zombies are particularly terrifying when they stand in for a story that looks at how human societies react to catastrophe. The well-made zombie movies (28 Days) seem so much more advanced than even the best vampire movies, in terms of deeper-meaning and context.

But, of course, the usual zombie fanatic is probably eating up the Dawn of the Dead types, and not the more terrifyingly realistic post-apocalyptic scenarios.

You should really give the book World War Z a try. The undead can make for some interesting dystopian fiction!

-Joanna


Posted By: Asianshoebox (October 6, 2009 at 11:32 AM)

Tamezxiii, I can't believe I just read such ignorance.

Saying they're appealing to both sexes is unbiased.  Saying they're only appealing to females is saying that only women are allowed to find men attractive.  And that is a bias.  Keep your homophobia away from the internet and in your crazy head where it belongs.


Posted By: tamezxiii (October 5, 2009 at 11:50 AM)

"Robert Pattinson and Stephen Moyer turn people on."

Uhhh, what?  Don't you mean "Robert Pattinson and Stephen Moyer turn FEMALES on." ???

Way to provide an unbiased view, since we all know  that females are the only ones that watch horror movies?

Take your British pretty boys crap somewhere else.  Or at least try and make your articles unbiased (as hard as that may seem).