Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:59 PM

What Kind of Education Secretary Will Obama Pick?

Pat Wingert

Though presidential candidates often say that education will be one of their top priorities, the job of education secretary is often among the last cabinet seats filled. While Barack Obama's transition team hasn’t floated any names yet, the education establishment---reformers, teachers’ unions, colleges and universities--has no shortage of candidates. What no one knows is whether Obama is leaning toward someone from the more innovative end of the reform movement (the group Democratic Rep. George Miller, who heads the U.S. House education committee, admiringly calls the “Disrupters”) or a candidate with close ties to the teachers’ unions. Long a key constituency in the Democratic Party, the unions are now under attack by the Disrupters, who see teachers’ protectiveness of tenure and seniority as barriers to dramatic reform, particularly in failing urban schools.

The innovators, who have made key alliances with corporate donors and politicians eager for a faster pace of reform, want one of their own in the top spot. Their favorites include New York City schools chancellor Joel Klein, who has helped transform the country’s biggest urban school system; Jon Schnur, the head of New Leaders for New Schools, who acted as an Obama surrogate during the campaign; Michelle Rhee, chancellor of the Washington, D.C., school system and founder of the New Teacher Project; Kati Haycock, the outspoken head of Education Trust, a nonpartisan powerhouse pushing for bold education reforms, or Wendy Kopp, who founded Teach for America, which funnels new graduates of prestigious colleges into hard-to-fill teaching positions.

The teachers’ unions prefer someone like Linda Darling-Hammond, a professor of education at Stanford who acted as a surrogate for Obama during the campaign or former Gov. Jim Hunt of North Carolina, both reformers who have a long history of working respectfully with the unions on issues like increased teacher professionalism. There’s even talk of Obama choosing one of their own, like Randi Weingarten, the savvy new president of the American Federation of Teachers.

During the campaign, Obama managed to convince both groups that he shared their vision of change. Teachers liked his criticism of the federal No Child Left Behind reform plan as inflexible and underfunded, and his promise that future reforms would be done with them, not to them. The innovators were encouraged by his shout-out to Rhee during the third presidential debate, his call for performance-based pay for teachers and his enthusiasm for the expansion of charter schools. However, when Obama recently put Darling-Hammond in charge of his education policy transition group (immediately raising the perception that she was a candidate for the top job), there were howls of protest from the Disrupters, who fear a return to the more modest and incremental pace of reform that characterized the Clinton years.

What about someone who can bring both sides together? Names that come up in those conversations include former secretary of state Colin Powell, who has long had an interest in education, as well as programs benefiting disadvantaged youth; Arne Duncan, who is well known to Obama as chief executive of Chicago’s public schools as well as a basketball-playing buddy; and Freeman Hrabowski, president of the University of Maryland-Baltimore County, an independent thinker who has been notably successful in attracting and graduating minority students in highly demanding college science and technology programs. Other governors getting buzz include Republican Tom Kean, former governor of New Jersey, former president of Drew University, and chairman of the 9/11 Commission, as well as Democrat Tim Kaine, the current governor of Virginia, who made Obama’s short list for vice president.

If the country’s economic woes slow down, Obama’s ability to boost education funding as promised, he may focus on someone who could wield the power of the bully pulpit as skillfully as Bill Bennett did during the early Reagan years. Powell and Hrabowski would both meet that criteria, while adding racial diversity to the cabinet.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: martialguy (December 19, 2008 at 7:29 AM)

Education is an uphill battle

Parents are stripped bare of power to effectively discipline their children when they get too spoiled rotten.   Juvies, and pens substituted parents' whips.

Science and math became... geeky subjects.   TV, sports, music and videogames became educators.   Chidren are predominantly taught to believe the world was created almost...overnight


Posted By: OldTeacher (December 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM)

Richard Elmore of Harvard. Katie Haycock of Ed Trust. Someone who cares more about kids than adults.


Posted By: singlays (December 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM)

No matter the orientation of the next Education Secretary, it is hoped that the dialogue follow this line of understanding:

This is the first of three posts I will be making over the next few weeks concerning one of the most prevalent problems in teaching today.

Our educational system is a mass of contradiction. It is peopled by smart, dedicated professionals at every level. It has access to jaw-dropping technology and is supported by massive amounts of money from local, state and federal agencies. It has every reason to be the best educational system in the world. Yet the plain truth is, nationally the system is failing. Too high a percentage of our students are failing because, in spite of all of this, we are failing our students.

There’s no point in citing the statistics; we’ve all heard plenty about falling test scores, dropout rates and teen illiteracy. When we hear such things, it hurts. And it hurts more because we have the money, the knowledge and the people we need to succeed. So although there are high-achieving schools and school districts, compared to what we should be achieving nationally, the system is failing.

Nearly all educational professionals are clear on the results they’d like to see: students interested and involved in learning, higher academic achievement, lower absenteeism, and improved discipline. But, statistically, we can all see that things are getting worse—not better.