<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.newsweek.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Round 2, Naturally Speaking</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/poweringup/archive/2008/11/26/finding-natural-fits.aspx</link><description>The policy wonks in Washington got their fix this week. Obama's announcement of top level posts at Treasury and confirmed rumors about the chiefs of State (Clinton), Justice (Holder) , and Defense ( incumbent Gates ) fill out the top ranks of the new</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)</generator><item><title>re: Round 2, Naturally Speaking</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/poweringup/archive/2008/11/26/finding-natural-fits.aspx#819337</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:10:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:819337</guid><dc:creator>soylentrob</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Kindy Kruller of the Delta Institute, an environmental think tank in Chicago, has a great article about the expected Obama policies and their environmental impact:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.greenexchange.com/read.php?id=25"&gt;http://www.greenexchange.com/read.php?id=25&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Powering Up</category></item><item><title>re: Round 2, Naturally Speaking</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/poweringup/archive/2008/11/26/finding-natural-fits.aspx#829453</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:829453</guid><dc:creator>greenyou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The U.S. is ready to confront the major challenge of global warming. &amp;nbsp;America generates roughly one quarter of the globe's greenhouse gases every year. &amp;nbsp;174 countries adopted the Kyoto protocol to reduce carbon levels, however, the U.S. did not. &amp;nbsp;The U.S. has resisted taking action on the global warming issue that threatens the survival of our coasts and farms, our health and the stability of our economy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; We have not achieved consensus on how to solve the problem. &amp;nbsp;Industries on the one hand have made few positive plans and on the other hand, environmental groups have proposed wide-reaching solutions that may seriously harm economic growth. &amp;nbsp;America needs to adopt an aggressive, effective plan that accommodates concerns of the environment as well as economic prosperity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The U.S. needs to stop the negative impact of climate change and ensure the survival of our lifestyle for future generations without seriously damaging the economy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Make sure to review the discussion of global warming at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.onebiosphere.com"&gt;http://www.onebiosphere.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charge on Carbon Emissions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; A key step will be to levy charges on carbon emissions. &amp;nbsp;When we charge users for emitting carbon, the equation is tipped in favor of alternative fuels and away from fossil fuels. &amp;nbsp;A cap-and-trade system may establish ceilings for carbon output and allow companies with positive balances to sell credits to companies that need the credits. &amp;nbsp;The net impact will be that carbon levels will fall. &amp;nbsp;Businesses will gain from being green so that should drive investment and research dollars into renewable energy and efficiency.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Powering Up</category></item></channel></rss>