Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:03 PM

A 172-line poem about our Gay Marriage Cover

Kurt Soller

Apparently, we have a poet among us! A reader named Stephen Kraynak, of Columbus, Ohio, sent in the poem below after reading last week's story (which, as you know by now, got lots of feedback... including a debate among biblical scholars). I'm tempted to wonder where Kraynak found the time to do this, but the poem is just too fantastic. It even rhymes:

Twas a Fortnight Before Christmas

Twas a fortnight before Christmas
And all through the land,
Many readers were stirring with
Newsweek's 12.15.08 edition in hand.

There on the front cover
To see in plain manner,
A cross on a Bible
With a rainbow flag banner.

"The Religious Case for Gay Marriage"
The lead story reads.
Tis about fairness and justice,
Which everyone needs.

"Our Mutual Joy,"
Writes editor Miller.
Gay couples in photos,
Are part of this thriller.

She says the Bible, the Torah
The Arrogance of Nations,
And Marriage, a History
Discuss human relations.

"For richer, for poorer
In sickness and health,"
In committed relations
The community finds wealth.

"There's no marriage in heaven,"
In Matthew it's written.
So why not get married
When by Cupid we're smitten?

"To love, honor and cherish,"
These words do we vow.
We are all God's children
This means all of us now.

The Bible's been used
To confine us, restrict us,
With selected quotations
From law-full Leviticus.

She says picking and choosing
A quote here and there,
Condone bigotry and hatred.
Both are unfair.

She writes, Jonathan and David,
Between them was passion,
Had deep love for each other,
And "one spirit" they fashioned.

The story of Jesus
She notes in this space,
Was one of acceptance
And his total embrace.

Surely Mary and Joseph,
All Christians and Jews,
Seek justice for all,
And share this good news!

Meacham writes from his desk
About marriage relations:
Many states once had laws
Banning miscegenation.

Is gender that different
Than one's class or race,
Excluding some only,
From freedom's embrace?

Today things are different
In CT. and Mass.,
They grant everyone rights
No matter sex, race or class.

So here, now I ponder
The other forty-eight.
When will you renounce
Your ignorance and hate?

With this on my mind,
I was gone in a flash.
Grabbed my own car keys,
And all my spare cash.

What better to give
As a present this year,
Than this Newsweek article
To spread hope and good cheer?

I bought them for gifts,
Twas my true intention.
Thank you, Newsweek,
For challenging social convention.

To drug stores and newsstands
I hurried this date,
For more copies of Newsweek,
Before twas too late.

I'll give them away
All wrapped up with bows,
To friends, neighbors - my family,
Must include those.

Every little bit helps.
(I learned this in school.)
"Due unto others."
Is the known golden rule.

And lest we forget
Our civil rights past,
Let's review U.S. history
So our freedoms will last.

Thurgood Marshall, his case
Against school segregation,
Argued the Fourteenth Amendment
Grants equal protection.

On May seventeenth,
Nineteen fifty-four,
Chief Justice Warren read this decision
From The Supreme Court's floor:

"1896's Plessy v. Ferguson
Hereby is overturned."
Thus, our long racist bridges
Were destroyed and burned.

The nine Supreme Justices
Each in his chair,
Ruled: "Separate but Equal"
is inherently unfair.

Here's an example
For this, our great nation.
Unjust laws are oft overturned
By the next generation.

So, this principle's now established      
In Brown vs. Board,              
Which promises equality
For civil accord.                    

So here we do have it
The law of the land.
We just need apply it
To the issue at hand.

"Separate but equal."
It is.  Or it isn't.
Can't have it both ways.
This just won't be silent.

But now we have Roberts,
Scalia, Alito and Thomas.
Conservative justice
Eroding this promise.

To counteract this,
If the truth be told.
We need more informed citizens,
Stating it clearly and bold:

"Life, liberty and happiness
Is the law of our land."
And for some this includes
A gold wedding band.

Today, is our day
To be fair and just.
Read our Constitution
And do what we must.

On Meacham, on Miller
On Newsweek et al.
Help promote freedom
Of marriage for all.

Someday prejudice and hatred
Surely shall cease.
Till then, seek out justice
And we will have peace.

Rev. King, he has told us
His vision he sends:
"The arc of history is long,"
But toward justice it bends

Two thousand and nine
Is almost at hand.
We must come together
Across our vast land.

Now, here's the great question
Here on Earth and above:
Which of us, truly,
Can legislate - love?

As the true spirit of Christmas
Settles into our houses.
Let's rethink and enrich marriage
To include same sex spouses.

I wrote this today
Without malice or spite.
To tell all fellow Americans:
It's time. Let's do what's right.

Who wants to challenge Kraynak? More poems, I say!

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: CHRISTSOWN (January 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM)

Bye the way the two comments below mine are exqusite and absolutely correct. We are also not bound by giving sacrifices because Jesus was the ultimate final sacrifice. His was Holy blood, never tainted by sin and completed the need as He took it to the heavenly altar. This kind of ignorance and blasphemy against our Holy Bible would have brought us into another war had it been said to a Muslim about the Quran, she should be sent packing for her arrogance.


Posted By: CHRISTSOWN (January 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM)

Lisa Miller may be what you call a religous editor but she has no knowledge of what the bible says or what it is about.

First of all we who love Christ are not a "religion or religious people", we have a relationship.

That relationship is with a God and His Christ who are not part of a "time continueum" there is no such thing as God being a God of a calendar. He says it, I believe it, and that settles it. The Bible was writen by men under the direction of God. All material within that book will be legitimate throughout the ages until the return of Christ. True, we do not have to abide by certain parts of the law because they were fulfilled by Christ such as dietary and clothing.

Christ is our only salvation and He is God, so, when people say that Jesus did not say anything against homosexuals they forget, He did not have to since He has already said it once.

Lisa Miller will have a hard time convincing God that what she wrote meant no damage because, when we practice to decieve in telling gays they are alright in their preference for same sex relationships we are playing by Satan's rules. This will not get anything from God but you will have condemned yourself. I shall pray for Lisa to awaken from her sleep. Her tolerance breeds intolerance from a Holy God.


Posted By: BMG4ME (December 24, 2008 at 2:59 PM)

My comments are as a Jew, so I won't comment on the attack on the new testament.  However there are so many ridiculous statements in Lisa Miller's article that I couldn't let it go by without commenting.  Also while I am not ashamed of my views, I do work with people that are gay, who may think that I am attacking them as people, which I am not.  I don't condemn gays, only the homosexual behavior that they advocate. I want to reiterate that I am not saying that gay people are bad, since this is how they are born and it's not a sin to be born gay - it's only a sin to practice gay sex.  Please don't publish my name, but feel free to publish what I write if you think it merits it.

First of all she attacks Abraham, Jacob and others, then says the new testament is "hardly better".  This implies that our forefathers did something wrong, but this is not the case. The Bible defines morality so the very fact that Abraham and Jacob did what they did means that it is OK.  It is Lisa's morality that is flawed.  Polygamy as a practice, while illegal today in the USA, is not morally wrong, although there are certainly issues with having more than one wife, which is why the Rabbis banned polygamy.  Similarly there are many opinions that say that some of our matriarchs were children when they get married, although Western society labels this as illegal today.  On the other hand society condones domestic partnerships, even giving equal rights to unmarried partners of any gender, and then wonders why we are raising a generation of maladjusted children (although noticeably not in those circles that uphold traditional values).  Society has created its own values.  Now there is nothing to stop even worse things becoming legal, such as bestiality, incest and three-way marriages.

Regarding Leviticus talking about leprosy, cleanliness rituals for menstruating women and the correct way to sacrifice animals, Miss Miller says that most of us no longer heed Leviticus.  This is a shame because the reason why leprosy occurred was to punish people who slandered and gossiped about other people, so while they are no longer punished with leprosy, the behavior that caused leprosy still exists today.  Jewish women DO still follow the rituals for menstruating women, and as a result we have large, vibrant families, filled with love and respect for one another.  The only reason why sacrifices don't exist today is because the Temples were destroyed, but when rebuilt, may it be now, these sacrifices will resume.

Now let's look at the statement "The Bible authors could never have imagined the brave new world of international adoption and assisted reproductive technology".  Since the Bible was authored by G-d, who knows everything, this is an absurd statement.  The Bible was written as much for today as it was written for then.  Most of today's laws that we take for granted originate from the Bible.

"The Bible endorses slavery, a practice that Americans now universally consider shameful and barbaric".  The shameful slavery that was practiced here against blacks was absolutely shameful and barbaric, but that was not slavery, as defined in the Bible, but rather human abuse.  The slavery in the Bible, was a relationship of respect for the slave, and only happened as a result of the slave committing an act that warranted slavery.  The treatment of slaves in the Bible is better compared with the treatment of employees by employers, except that in most cases the slaves in the Bible were treated with much more respect and lived much more enjoyable lives under their masters than many employees of today (fortunately, in my case I work for a great company that treats us very well).

Gay marriage will never be normal, and homosexuality, no matter how you look at it, is wrong.  Being gay, instead of being looked at as a great opportunity to overcome this G-d given test and living a normal life, marrying someone of the opposite sex and having children, has become a symbol of freedom and tolerance, although ironically most of the intolerance seems to come from those that are actually advocating more tolerance.