David Botti
|
Jan 17, 2008 12:21 PM
On Monday we took a look at the fallout over a New York Times article
looking at recent war veterans who have committed murder. Some critics
said this article perpetuated the myth of "wacko" veterans returning
from war. Additionally, a lack of comparison to murder rates among the
civilian population was said to unfairly highlight the 121 veterans
mentioned in the article. At the time of my last post most of the
criticism seemed to be stemming from the online community. By today,
however, we've seen this wave of thought reach the mainstream press.
In yesterday's New York Times the op-ed page printed letters from readers reacting to the story. Some excerpts:
CON:
Your article about veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who
have committed or been charged with murder perpetuates the myth about
crazed war veterans. You note that in researching “homicides
involving all active-duty military personnel and new veterans for the
six years” after the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, there have been
349 cases. There are more than 1.4 million Americans on active
duty. Philadelphia, a city with a similar population, alone had 392
murders in 2007. As a veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan, I
find articles like yours do a disservice to America’s combat veterans
by shaping a public perception that they are damaged people, prone to
violence.
PRO:
It was simply not manly to seek psychiatric help during and after
Vietnam. In my own case, I suffered for some 40 years. After all the
nightmares, sleepwalking, waking myself up with my own screams and
causing my near relatives anxiety and fear, a police officer introduced
me to a talk group of Vietnam veterans at the local V.A. hospital...You are never the same when you return from combat. The
American people must therefore be absolutely sure of the engaged war
because of the terrible things war does to the psyches of those
soldiers. It may be worth it, but only if the objectives of the war are
worth it...Deep down, those images and sounds never go away. I am
happy that today the military has recognized the humanity and manhood
of those who seek help.
Citing the reporting done by "a platoon of Times reporters" the Wall Street Journal published this commentary in which it took issue with the Times' statistical approach:
More