Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:01 AM

An Environmental Addendum

David Botti
Yesterday we took a look at a batch of new electric cars members of the Army, Air Force, and Navy will soon find ferrying them around bases.  Environmental magazine Plenty recently gave a quick rundown on the good and the bad of military policies as they pertain to the environment.  As one might expect, the piece notes the further away a particular environmental initiative is to accomplishing a tactical mission, the less the military is probably interested in it.  Still, it looks like there are some good things (and not so good) going on according to Plenty [excerpts]:

The good

* At North Carolina's Fort Bragg, troops train in mock villages built from recycled shipping containers. The container construction cuts waste and energy use, while reducing the price tag from $400,000 per village to just $25,000.

* At forward operating bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, 85 percent of energy goes to power AC units that keep troops and equipment cool. Spraying foam insulation directly onto tents has cut energy losses by 45 percent, reducing the amount of diesel trucked to the front line and decreasing convoys’ exposure to attacks.

The bad

* The armed forces rely heavily on domestic fuel, using 1.5 percent of America’s oil. That’s spurred investment in coal-to-liquid technologies, which release huge quantities of greenhouse gases, and the Department of Defense wants to start drilling for oil on military bases.

* Forget hybrid Humvees. Efforts to build battery-powered tactical vehicles have fallen flat — the military will be using conventional gas-guzzlers for the foreseeable future.

The ugly

* The Pentagon claims that depleted uranium munitions, widely used by US troops in Iraq, are harmless. Scientists aren’t so sure: The Royal Society, Britain’s national academy of science, says the radioactive metal can poison soil and water, and raises risks of kidney damage and lung cancer.

* Under the Bush Administration, the military won exemptions from environmental regulations protecting endangered species, migratory birds, and marine mammals. Now the DoD hopes to sidestep rules governing Superfund sites and air pollution, skipping costly clean-ups on 129 heavily-polluted sites and redefining “hazardous materials” to exclude unexploded munitions.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

No Comments