Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
  • Pat Tillman's Legacy Four Years On

    David Botti | May 9, 2008 01:58 PM
    Though he was killed in Afghanistan in 2004, Pat Tillman's death is still a subject of controversy and tremendous reflection. Tillman, you will recall, was the NFL player turned Army Ranger who was originally said to have died under enemy fire (he was awarded the Silver Star), but later reports found he was killed by friendly fire.

    Now his mother, Mary, has published a book in which she charges that former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld knew about the cover-up over the details of her son's death.  As she writes [via MSNBC]:

    “... I believe Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld knew Pat was killed by fratricide and permitted the cover-up.  It is not believable that a man known for his propensity to micromanage would not want to know what happened to his most high-profile soldier. I informed the committee that Pat received a personal letter from Rumsfeld shortly after he and his brother enlisted, commending him for his commitment to serve. Pat was obviously in Rumsfeld's consciousness."

    During a recent 60 Minutes interview, Katie Couric questioned Army Secretary Pete Geren over the alterations of eyewitness accounts of Tillman's death used for his Silver Star citation.  She asked if he knew who manipulated the statements, and he replied:

    "Well, that's one of the questions that we will never completely answer.  But it certainly is one of the areas that that raises questions. There are so many mistakes. So many things that happened. If you add them all together, it certainly calls into question the credibility of those who handled this. And raises the kind of questions that Ms. Tillman raises. I don't blame her for that. And I don't expect her ever to believe us. But there was no effort to deceive. There were mistakes and grievous errors by the legions. And as a result, we fell short of our duty to her as a mother of one of our heroes."

    Over at the IAVA blog, Perry Jefferies takes issue with Sec. Geren's uncertainty, saying that the process for awarding medals should clearly indicate who writes a citation:

    Only a certain amount of people handle the citation for the Silver Star, one of our highest military awards. Each commander signs a block on the document and there is a document called a transmittal letter that accompanies it from office to office. Only organizational will prevents the Army from prosecuting the criminal that a) faked an official document and b) tried to leave a lower grade enlisted Soldier to take the blame.

    If indeed the medal was awarded under dishonest conditions, should it still stand?  A letter to the Arizona Republic newspaper took this stance:

    The awarding of the decoration was illegal, as the incident obviously didn't represent "gallantry in action against an armed enemy," as required by the Army's own regulations.  This award does a disservice to all of our veterans who have legitimately earned this august award. The Tillman family should return the award to the Army, which should then rescind the award as unjustified and issued illegally.

    Another reader then responded:
    Yes, it may be true that this star represents "gallantry in action against an armed enemy." What could be more gallant than a young man giving up not only his career but his life?  Pat Tillman gave up his life to serve in an illegal war that has ruined our economy with the billions of dollars being wasted but, more important, the loss of the respect of the rest of the world.

    In the New York Times' look at Mary Tillman's new book, there's an interesting historical note of other athletes who've been killed in action.

    Eddie Grant, the Giants’ third baseman, died in France in 1918. Christy Mathewson, the great Giants pitcher, had his life shortened from a mustard-gas accident in training near the end of World War I. And Nile Kinnick, the star running back from Iowa, died in a training flight in 1943. But Pat Tillman’s death was different because of the way he was used, posthumously, blatantly.

    You can read a Newsweek Q&A with Mary Tillman here.

    More
  • Trying to Modernize the GI Bill

    David Botti | Apr 29, 2008 10:41 AM
    More than half a century after the GI Bill was first enacted to help send vets to college, politicians and advocates are touting a new proposed bill to expand these benefits. The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act was introduced by a number of Republicans and Democrats in both the House and Senate. Among them is Virginia Senator (and Vietnam vet) Jim Webb whose posted this statement on his Website:

    The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act is designed to offer the brave men and women who have served honorably since September 11, 2001 a level of educational benefits on par with those provided to veterans of the World War II era.

    In a profile of numerous veterans struggling to capitalize on education opportunities after returning home from war, the Washington Post helps to break down where the current GI Bill stands now.  The problem is that these benefits can no longer fully fund higher education, as they once did for earlier generations of veterans.

    Many people enlist to earn money for college, and almost everyone signs up for the education benefits -- which, in the case of the main GI Bill, requires a service member to pay about $1,200 into the plan-- but not everyone takes advantage of it. And that buy-in is not returned even if the benefits are unused.

    About 70 percent use at least some part of it, said Keith Wilson, director of the education service, but the VA does not track how many earn degrees.

    An independent study found that just over half use some part of the benefits, said Ray Kelley of AMVETS, a veterans support group, and only 8 percent use all. "Congress is realizing we're not giving them the benefits we say we're giving them," Kelley said. "They only have 36 months from the time they start using it to the time they finish." That means going to school full time, year-round.


    Earlier this month NPR's Morning Edition broke down more of the specifics of the proposed bill.
    More
  • Advertisement
  • Interview: An Iraq Vet Runs for Congress

    David Botti | Mar 5, 2008 12:57 PM
    Kieran Lalor is a former Marine reservist and Iraq veteran running for Congress in New York’s nineteenth district.  He’s also the founder of Iraq Vets for Congress, a group of 14 Republican, pro-war vets running in districts from Maine to California.  
     
    Lalor, 32, and I spent many years together as rifleman in the same infantry company based in upstate New York. We served in Iraq (although in different platoons), and experienced the military’s transition into wartime footing after 9/11.

    I spoke with Lalor about our shared military experiences, fallen comrades, his entry into politics, John McCain, and how he’s hoping to make 2008 the year of Republican war veterans elected to office. Excerpts:



    SOLDIER’S HOME: When we were over there in Iraq I barely thought about the politics of it all. I had some sense of what was going, but didn’t pay to much attention to it. Was it the same for you? When did you start really thinking hard about the political aspect of the war?

    LALOR: Officially my campaign began on November 25, 2007, but it really began on 9/11. One of my sisters worked in the north tower of the World Trade Center. On September 11th I was living in here in Westchester, about 40 miles from Ground Zero. I was watching TV with a year of reserve duty under my belt, so I was watching this as a U.S. Marine; watching our country get attacked, wondering if my sister was dead or alive.  I just felt helpless.  I didn’t ever want to feel that way again, and it just woke me up. I realized our generation had a big challenge.

    I went through the 90’s and everything was hunky dory: a prosperous economy, and at least the appearance of peace. I thought we were going to have a free ride. Our parents' generation had the Cold War, our grandparents had WWII and the depression. September 11th hit and I thought, "OK, our generation has some work to do."

    In Iraq I don’t think I really thought about the politics except that I just remember thinking of some of these pictures I had taken: the kids and the American flag, the kids running up to us, or hanging out by the gate [of our HQ]. If these scenes could have been brought home five years ago the impression of the war could’ve been different here. We got a lot of negative, and not a lot of positive.  

    It wasn’t Iraq so much as the wider War on Terror that got me to run. My passion became how do you secure a country of 300 million people, and protect civil liberties.


    Did anything specific happen while we were in Iraq that’s influenced your platform, or ideas about politics?

    One thing that informs my foreign policy view, and why I continue to support the war in Iraq, is how we were running patrols 24/7 out in the streets of Nasiriyah. We were being proactive. Well, the Italian [coalition forces] relieved us, and their doctrine was react to problems in the streets. And, they got hit [by a suicide bomber], and a good number of them died. I think that the Italian strategy of reacting, and staying home in the compound until something happened in the streets, was basically American foreign policy up until September 11th. On a small scale our [rifle company’s] doctrine of being proactive, and being omnipresent in the streets is what I believe is the best post-9/11 foreign policy.


    I asked Lalor about Lcpl Glover, a very good friend of his who was killed in Iraq in 2006.  Glover didn’t serve with us in Iraq, but he joined the unit later and volunteered for a subsequent deployment. He was killed along with another Marine from our unit during a sniper attack in Fallujah. I wrote about his funeral for a post on Veterans Day last year.

    Mike Glover was one of my best friends, and in some ways I feel responsible for getting him into the Marine Corps. I really feel like we owe it to all those guys, especially Glover because I knew him so well. I don’t want him to have died in vain. That happened three years after we got back, and his death really made me more resolved. I talked to Glover’s family a little bit about that aspect, and they don’t want his death to have been in vain. I’ve also gotten calls from Gold Star Mothers and Fathers saying thanks for carrying on my son’s legacy. It takes my breath away, and I take it seriously.

    I never talk about him in a political context. I’m comfortable talking about him to you because I know you. I told a story about him in a speech on Veterans Day, but I asked permission from his family to mention him. But, he kind of symbolizes all of the other guys [four marines from our unit killed in Iraq from 2004-2006]. What’s ironic is that they all volunteered, and didn’t have to go. It’s kind of eerie, but it says a lot.


    Why did you form the group Iraq Vets for Congress?

    To help individual campaigns. If there are veterans who vote because a guy is a fellow veteran, that individual person does that on his own. [I formed the group] because politics has become a millionaire's game. A high, high percentage of people in congress are millionaires. So, by joining forces with other veterans we’ve been able to get more national attention. We’re starting to break through nationally and what that does it raise our individual profiles. And, the biggest thing is fund raising. I have to raise more than a million dollars for this campaign. I have about a hundred thousand so far, and my opponent already has a million dollars.


    Does the fact that McCain, another Republican veteran, is also running have any affect on your individual campaigns?

    McCain always brings out a lot of veterans who vote. He’ll bring out a few thousand people that are veterans that don’t normally vote; that seems to be a trend. Also, because of Iraq Vets for Congress I’ve been contacted by the McCain campaign. What we offer him is 14 guys in districts where there’s no republican Congressman. There’s two guys in Ohio and two guys in Pennsylvania which are big states that you have to win. We can help him, and he can help us. Also, we try to hammer home that we want to make 2008 the year of the republican veteran. With McCain on the popular ticket, the 14 of us, some other Vietnam vets, and Gulf War vets running, that’s a theme we’re trying to build.

    A lot of people paint Republicans as chicken hawks: people who cheer lead for war, but don’t want to put their lives on the line. Our campaigns dispel that myth.


    Is there a danger of placing too much of your campaign’s emphasis on the fact you’re a veteran?

    I don’t think that’s enough to get somebody elected, but it definitely gets peoples' attention. There has to be a balance. You have to be more than just a guy who served in Iraq.


    What about the fact that you were a reservist? We were called up twice on relatively short notice, leaving behind or jobs, school, and families. What impact has that had on you?


    That kind of balancing act: living in a couple of different worlds and being well-rounded, is very helpful running for Congress. I’m not completely of the military mindset, which I think is good. Being half in the military world, and half in the civilian world gives you double the amount of perspective. I can see the other side: what it does to employers, and what it’s like trying to get back into the work force for example. Sometimes I’d go into interviews and I’d feel like I was sitting in that chair because this guy wanted someone to debate the Iraq war with–even though I had no chance of getting that job.


    How have people reacted on the campaign trail towards the fact that you’re a veteran?

    People have been pretty good.  There’s been positive feedback.  I don’t think it’s enough to get elected.  The Iraq war is a difficult issue for republicans, and every republican is going to have to deal with it.  And somebody who’s served in Iraq can deal with it better than anybody.  When I get questions about it I say, listen: I risked my life there, I lost friends there.  If I thought it wasn’t making our country safer I’d be the loudest voice saying that.  

    More
  • Obama's Comment On Taliban Weapons

    David Botti | Feb 26, 2008 11:25 AM
    Over at the IntelDump last Friday, Phil Carter was urged by his readers to examine an anecdote Barack Obama gave in the Democratic presidential debate the day before. In the military community Obama's recollection of his conversation with an Army captain about the use of captured weapons prompted curiosity, skepticism, and disbelief.  As Obama said:
    I heard from a Army captain, who was the head of a rifle platoon, supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24, because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq. And as a consequence, they didn't have enough ammunition; they didn't have enough humvees.

    They were actually capturing Taliban weapons because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief. Now that's a consequence of bad judgment, and you know, the question is on the critical issues that we face right now who's going to show the judgment to lead.


    What's got everyone talking is the idea that U.S. troops are so ill-equipped that they are actually using the enemy's weapons to turn around and fight the same enemy. My rifle company landed in Iraq in 2003 with hardly any M240G machine gun ammo. The rumor was additional ammo was graciously provided to the machine gunners by some Navy SEAL's. But that was when the war first started. How about now?

    Carter provided a few follow-ups which sought to fact-check Obama's comments.  Here's what he found out through a friend:
    I talked this morning with two friends who led rifle platoons in Afghanistan. Both confirmed to me that they did, at times, use captured or found weapons or ammunition. One relayed the story of mounting a Soviet 12.7mm heavy machine gun (the equivalent of a U.S. .50 caliber machine gun) on his HMMWV because it was too difficult to get the spare parts needed to fix their G.I. (government issue) .50 cal. Another told me his platoon carried AKs anytime they patrolled with their Afghan counterparts, and that it was always much easier to get 7.62mm ammo for the AKs than to go through the U.S. bureaucracy for ammunition requisition.

    Then there was ABC News National Correspondent Jake Tapper who went straight to the Obama campaign staff seeking an interview with the Army soldier Obama referenced. The story checks out; but Tapper saw fit to elaborate:

    They also didn't have the humvees they were supposed to have both before deployment and once they were in Afghanistan, the Captain says.

    "We should have had 4 up-armored humvees," he said. "We were supposed to. But at most we had three operable humvees, and it was usually just two."

    So what did they do? "To get the rest of the platoon to the fight," he says, "we would use Toyota Hilux pickup trucks or unarmored flatbed humvees." Sometimes with sandbags, sometimes without.


    Carter also pointed out this post on the National Review Online which took issue with the idea that captains were commanding rifle platoons; a job normally reserved for lieutenants. At one point I had a captain commanding my rifle platoon; so, that takes care of that, fact-check. Particularly in the Marine Corps Reserves, where officers must complete a period of active duty service before switching to reserve duty, you find hardly any Lieutenants. The result is that higher ranks are sometimes taking up lower billeted job positions.

    Finally, over the weekend, the Associated Press fact-checked Obama's story. The article also mentioned that Sen. John Warner, ranking Republican member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, is seeking information about the anonymous captain and his platoon. Warner is looking to speak about the situation at the next committee meeting.


    More
  • What Veterans Think of McCain

    David Botti | Feb 19, 2008 11:20 AM
    As the only combat veteran among the remaining presidential candidates, John McCain has a unique relationship to the current generation of vets cycling home from the fronts in Iraq and Afghanistan. What do veterans think of McCain? Are they inclined to hold him in higher respect, or follow his candidacy with a more critical eye? Can he count on their vote, or does he need to work twice as hard to assure them his plan for Iraq is the right one?

    VoteVets.org (which lists Gen. Wesley Clark on its board of advisers) has a prominent feature linked off the homepage titled "Senator McCain's Real Record on the War in Iraq." The gist of their bullet-pointed argument is that Sen. McCain's policy toward the Iraq war is too closely aligned with President Bush. Among other points, VoteVets.org maintains:
    McCain echoed Bush and Cheney’s talking points that the U.S. would only be in Iraq for a short time.

    McCain said winning the war would be “easy.”

    Senator McCain has constantly moved the goal posts of progress for the war – repeatedly saying it would be over soon.

    Senator McCain opposed efforts to end the overextension of the military that is having a devastating impact on our troops.

    In January VoteVets.org chairman Jon Soltz addressed the issue of Sen. McCain's military service:

    John McCain is a true war hero, and we all respect his service. I don't doubt for a second that he cares for our troops. But, every time he opens his mouth, I'm less and less convinced that he realizes how dangerous his off the cuff words would imperil our men and women in harm's way, and our national security, if he said them as President.

    Earlier this month the San Jose Mercury News took a look at a group of veterans gathering at a California American Legion hall to cheer on Sen. McCain. Doug McNea, a 60-year-old Navy veteran, told the paper he admires the connection Sen. McCain can make with veterans of all wars:
    More
  • "Re-Upping"

    David Botti | Jan 22, 2008 02:05 PM
    Both the Army National Guard and the Marine Corps had recruitment ads before the previews at the movie I saw this weekend. The National Guard ad in part depicted post-Katrina-esque scenarios where guardsmen went to the aid of civilians. The filming was sweeping and highly dramatized. The Marine Corps ad offered not so much long scenes, but quick clips of intensity as infantry stormed houses and drill instructors marched recruits. They were both obvious sales pitches. The mere fact you could see two military recruitment ads before a Sunday matinée gave a nice little reminder of what kind of times we're living in.

    It did another thing.  It made me feel for a fleeting moment like I had to get the hell out of there and reenlist.  

    Recently my good Marine friend thought about doing just that. On inactive reserve, he signed back up to rejoin our old unit for one very specific reason: the scuttlebutt says they'll be heading back to Iraq soon, and he wanted to be with them. The unit was both of ours for six years. We were mobilized with its Marines and still feel the pull of bonds we'd cemented there.  

    He arrived to find just a handful of Marines left whom we'd known in the old days. They all asked the same thing: why the heck are you here? They told him he had a good thing going in civilian life, and that'd he done his time in the Corps and with the unit. Even the officers thanked him for offering to return, but said it wouldn't be the best thing for him to do. So, that was it.  He left the headquarters never to return. Still, it was only by going to see these Marines face-to-face that he could be sure that chapter in his life was over.

    I'm certain most of the Marines I've known have contemplated "re-upping" at one time or another.  Each man has his own personal reasons why he did or didn't go through with it. I've also seen the same phrase uttered over and over again by friends and family trying to dissuade their Marine from going back to war: "you did your time."  That one phrase can grate at your own thoughts already conflicted over having to make such a difficult decision. But it wasn't until my friend was told he'd done his time by Marines themselves it suddenly became valid.

    With a war still on it's difficult to think that you will never wear a uniform again--even if you have no real intention of ever doing so. Even seeing over-dramatized recruitment ads in a movie theater can make you feel guilty for sitting there instead of in a patrol base. I've often wondered if veterans of wars long since gone feel the same way. My father, a Korean War veteran of the Air Force, still insists he'd strap himself into a fighter jet if they'd let him. How much do they see of themselves in the young veterans coming home, and what have they learned since their own homecoming that today's vets don't know?

    In the end there's nothing much one can do except offer support, look at old pictures, and tell war stories with your friends--and think with faint jealousy of that young image of yourself, pulling up to the gates of boot camp totally scared sh*tless.

    More
  • Article on Veterans Committing Murder Stirs Debate

    David Botti | Jan 14, 2008 04:18 PM
    Over the weekend the New York Times published an in-depth look at murders committed by current war veterans in the United States.  In what the article called a "quiet phenomenon" many of these crimes were said to be in part the result of emotional trauma caused by the veterans' wartime experiences.  Through it's investigation the Times reported 121 confirmed murders committed by veterans, while also saying there were probably more.  There's no central database that keeps track of such figures. 

    Here are some of the major facts presented by the Times:
    More
  • Meet the New Generation of War Veterans

    David Botti | Dec 27, 2007 12:56 PM

    From Newsweek's Dec. 31, 2007-Jan. 7, 2008 issue:

     

    I grew up in an era when war veterans were the aging men at Memorial Day parades wearing triangular hats. It never crossed my mind that a vet might someday be a kid like me. If it had never crossed yours, either, this year probably changed all that. At my graduate school in New York, I can count at least five classmates who know an Iraq War veteran firsthand—and that's just one class, in one school. More than 1 million veterans have returned from Iraq and Afghanistan, lifting our collective profile by the sheer weight of our numbers.

    During the past year, veterans' issues were all over the media—and often the news was grim. In February the Walter Reed hospital scandal broke, with revelations about decrepit housing and substandard care. Next came a series of reports on Iraq War data: we learned that the Army suicide rate had reached a 26-year high in 2006; that there'd been 4,698 desertions during the 2007 fiscal year, an 80 percent increase since 2003; that the number of Iraq vets diagnosed with mental-health issues triples during their first six months at home. I followed these stories with a strange sense of relief. For too long, people seemed to think veterans came home and simply melted back into society. Now vet issues were finally getting attention—even if it took bad news to make it happen.

    When I started my blog this year, I wondered if there would be enough news about veterans to get me through one day. I couldn't have been more wrong. There we were in the rhetoric of politicians, in countless newspaper features, even on reality TV. For the blog, I've made an effort to examine not only the challenges that my fellow veterans face but also their accomplishments. As one Wall Street Journal columnist wrote, "The media struggles in good faith to respect our troops, but too often it merely pities them."

    Stories like the Walter Reed scandal can invite this kind of pity and overshadow the fact that most of us are immensely proud of our service. A single tour in Iraq or Afghanistan can define a person's entire life; collectively, our experiences will echo for decades. If 2007 was the year when veterans' issues entered the public's consciousness, we need to make sure they don't go away in 2008.

    More
  • Thoughts of Marines from Iraq War's Beginning

    David Botti | Dec 14, 2007 02:02 PM
    During my deployment to Iraq in 2003 I kept a journal thinking someday, when I'm old and gray, I'd want to remember how things were back in the summer of '03. One section of this journal was comprised of interviews I did with Marines in my platoon over a period of two days. We'd been in Iraq less than three weeks, and so far had not moved from our initial position guarding a bridge in the middle of nowhere. 

    The interviews were not done for any journalistic purpose, but simply to get a sense of what other people in my platoon were thinking. I've posted excerpts below. One thing to keep in mind as you read them is the diversity of answers. Some of them may sound crass, but that's just the kind of black humor that gets you though the day. Also remember that at the time the war was less than a month old.
    More
  • Attending a Veteran’s Funeral

    David Botti | Nov 12, 2007 11:25 AM
    Photo: Seth Wenig/AP

    When I heard Captain McKenna was going to lead a platoon of volunteers from my old reserve rifle company who were heading to Iraq, I was relieved. He’d take care of them. He was an enlisted man’s officer. He was pure and simple a decent person, and a respected leader.

    He was killed on Aug. 16, 2006-shot by a sniper near Fallujah as he went to rescue a wounded Marine, Lance Corporal Glover, who also died that day. Their funerals both took place in New York City within the same week.

    I often wish that every American could attend at least one funeral of a soldier killed in Iraq or Afghanistan. They are one of only a few occasions when military and civilian rituals can come together as one. They are the proud and largely unknown moments of American history. Since 9/11, they’ve taken place more than 4,000 times.

    More
  • A West Point Graduate on His Fifth Reunion

    David Botti | Nov 6, 2007 10:29 AM
    A West Point graduate and two-tour Iraq veteran, Matt Mabe recently returned to the military academy for his fifth-year reunion.  He left the Army as a Captain, and served as a combat engineer during his Iraq deployments. Matt and I are classmates in graduate school, and I recently interviewed him about his emotional return to West Point. Excerpts:

    S.H.: You served two tours in Iraq since graduating from West Point.  What was it like to return to your alma mater as a combat veteran?

    Matt Mabe: It’s funny. When I was a cadet, I would look at graduates returning for their reunions as people who had triumphed in life. Some still wore the uniform. Others had left the Army to pursue careers in civilian life. They all carried an air of accomplishment. They all seemed to have won the lottery of life.

    I always fantasized about returning one day as one of those content, successful, confident graduates I admired. And when I finally did make it back, I guess I played the part.

    It was Homecoming weekend. There was a tour and a parade. There were barbecues and a football game. There were thousands of cadets enjoying one day of respite in a punishing four-year experience. It was novel and pleasant.

    But, deep down, I felt empty. I began to think about those of my classmates who could not be there to share the experience with those of us who could.

    I thought of Todd Bryant, who was killed by a roadside bomb outside Fallujah on Halloween Day 2003 after only a few weeks on the ground. He had been married for two months.

    I thought of Jim Gurbisz, who suffered the same fate in Baghdad in November 2005. He was honored with a burial in Arlington National Cemetery.

    I thought of Drew Jensen, who was shot in the neck by a sniper in Baqubah in May, paralyzing him from the neck down. He had been trying to save one of his soldiers who was pinned behind a Humvee after a bomb explosion. Last month, Drew asked his wife and mother to take him off life support. Before having his final wish granted, he donated $10,000 to Walter Reed Army Medical Center to establish a fund to help families cover expenses while visiting their wounded loved ones.

    I thought about the values that the academy imbued in all of us over four grueling years. Things like Loyalty, Selfless Service, Honor.

    I felt proud to have once walked the same halls as these men. It comforted me to think that their souls will always dwell among those hallowed grounds.

    I am haunted by the sacrifices that thousands of Americans like them have made. The faces of the cadets I saw at my reunion reminded me of the innocence they will soon lose when they, too, are thrown against the guns.

    And my heart broke for my country.


    What are your last memories of West Point as a cadet?
    More
  • Interview: Ken Burns on WWII Vets [Part 1]

    David Botti | Oct 31, 2007 10:06 AM
    Last month filmmaker Ken Burns debuted his seven-part World War II documentary on PBS, "The War," an epic chronicle of combat and home front experiences. I spoke with him this week at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism about working with veterans during the six years of production on the film. Today’s is the first post in a multi-part series. Excerpts:

    S.H.: For The Veterans History Project you gave advice to regular people interviewing veterans in their own families.  You talked about establishing a “comfort zone” for the interview.  How did you do this with vets you interviewed for The War?

    BURNS: What we look for at the essence of an interview is free exchange. We aren’t investigative journalists. We aren’t there with their tax returns for the last ten years grilling them. This dynamic is most critical when you’re interviewing veterans, because quite often you’re dealing with people who have, understandably, locked away horrific things that they’ve seen, and horrific things that they’ve done–and people they’ve had close to them that they’ve lost.

    You have to be respectful and mindful of the fact that they may not get there. That they may not reveal that. And there’s no amount of trickery or cajolery worth it to try to do that.  

    So, what we look for is to film them in a comfortable situation. To do so in places where they feel comfortable, to be non-threatening, but to also pursue questions, and not just have a rigorous set of questions, so that you might miss following up on something that was quite meaningful.

    A particular veteran [Quentin Aanenson] in our films said “I loved airplane flying when I was a kid, that’s where I want to go–that’s where I want to be sometime.”  But if you watch his eye crinkles you know that’s not where he wanted to be.  That what he saw when he eventually became a pilot was so horrible. And so we moved–we just tested him, and he gave up stuff his wife had never heard, his children had never heard before. Maybe I missed lots of stuff he would’ve told me.  

    I was with him in a public discussion a year after we finished the film, and he told us something he had never said on film: that he’s lived outside of Washington D.C. for the last 50 years, and every time he and his son went to a Washington Redskins football game, as he was singing "The Star-Spangled Banner," he went through all the friends that he lost in the war. He never told his son, never told anyone else, and as he began to tear up in an audience of his sons and all the other people, you began to realize that you were present once again at the very thing you hope to have, not just with veterans but with anybody.

    Particularly with veterans because they are getting at the dynamic of combat and a war–the most exaggerated state that human beings get.  Not something that’s distant, but something that’s present.

    This is a guy who wakes up most every night from nightmares, from the Second World War, done for him for 60 years, with his hands in a palsy, in a shake because he’s remembering the time when he caught some Germans out in the open and was cutting human beings in half with his 50mm machine guns off his Thunderbolt [fighter plane].

    He still has this. His wife always reads him as he comes into the kitchen, and will sometimes hand the cup of coffee to the other hand.  

    Sometimes I found with a veteran [Paul Fussell], a man who’s actually written about war, and is known as kind of a well-spoken and avuncular chronicler of the human experience of war–I found myself saying, 'I’m not interested in that.'  

    I’m interested in you as a 19-year-old lieutenant on the line whose average life expectancy was 17 days, and you didn’t take a shower, or brush your teeth, or change your clothes in six months. And you outlived those odds until you were severely wounded, and they moved you to the head of the line, and patched you up for the invasion of Japan which fortunately did not happen otherwise you would’ve gone mad.  

    I just said to him at some point early on “you saw bad things.”
    More
  • Words of Fear from a Translator's Emails

    David Botti | Oct 24, 2007 11:35 AM

    I wait for emails from my former Iraqi translator to appear in my Inbox—too long a wait, and I assume he’s dead. I fear mentioning any part of his name that might identify him to the wrong people.

    Sitting on the steps of my platoon’s HQ in southern Iraq some time in 2003, I asked our translator what he had done while his city was being bombed by Americans during the invasion. 

    He started into an impassioned 5-minute monologue. A 20-year-old student, he told of how Saddam’s Fedayeen guerrillas tried to recruit his university’s English class to defend the city as Marines closed in. He described days of remaining in his home as the fighting began, the fervent praying in a cramped room with his sister’s annoying children.

    In subsequent conversations he would speak of life under Saddam’s regime, the murder of his anti-government uncle and the torture of a friend whose fingernails had been ripped out after emailing the United States.  

    He still tells stories.

    In November 2003 he wrote to my unit (then recently returned from Iraq) about the bombing of our former HQ, where he was working Italian soldiers.

    "im okky my friend god help me from this explosion i was in petrol with my friend italian it was every thing horrible thanks for god because he saved me"


    He wrote that he feared being killed and how he hated Iraq and wanted to leave it.

    "just tell me what ican do if when i walk in the street one day terrerist man will kill me in front of all people in the markit or in any where."

    Another email, sent on April 10, 2004:

    More
  • A Word on This Blog's Title

    David Botti | Oct 12, 2007 10:40 PM
    I’ve named this blog after a story Ernest Hemingway published in his 1925 short story collection, “In Our Time,” about the experiences of Harold Krebs, a young Marine returning to Kansas after fighting in World War One.  

    Krebs sleeps late every day, and passes time in his parents’ house, sometimes strolling through town or watching from his porch as the neighborhood girls walk by.  He lies about his military experiences because people in town are sick of hearing about the war.  He’s terse with his mother who prods him with questions about his future.  He lacks ambition, drive, and an overall desire to interact with the rest of society.  He reads history books about the battles he’s just fought.  He compares life on the home front with the military life he’s just left.

    The specifics of Krebs’ post-war experience are not necessarily the same for those veterans of  Iraq and Afghanistan, but Hemingway’s overarching portrayal of a brand new veteran’s feelings of displacement back in his hometown is a common theme I’ve heard among fellow veterans of my own generation.

    As an infantryman in the Marine Corps Reserve, I left Iraq in late-July 2003, among the first waves of Iraq veterans to return home.  I moved to New York City where the city’s daily life seemed to proceed unfazed by the four-month-old war.  Others in my unit returned to their homes throughout New York State and beyond.  Some deployed again to Iraq, others refused to even consider doing so.

    I first read “Soldier’s Home” around 1999 for a college English class and didn’t think much of it.  When I read it again after returning from Iraq, I felt relief that I wasn’t alone in feeling numb, depressed, and ambivalent about my future as a civilian.  Hemingway, himself a war veteran, showed that at its core a soldier’s experience of coming home is similar throughout all generations.  

    Each war, however, brings its own sets of circumstances.  Current issues such as veterans care, troop rotations, PTSD, and family hardship are among those which not only affect those involved, but the mood of the overall country as well.  And then there are the private stories of the lone veteran who is one day in Iraq, and the next day back home away from his or her comrades – the only people with the shared experience of deployment.  

    New veterans are still being made every day the moment they board a homeward bound plane from Iraq, Kuwait, or Afghanistan.  They will play an important part in American society for decades to come.  

    The purpose of this blog is to give the public a better glimpse of what life is like for that neighbor, or friend of a friend, or soldier interviewed on TV.  If this blog can get readers talking, and even just a little more aware of the veterans around them, then it is most certainly doing its job.
    More
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
AFRICA

These are among the ruling party's weapons against opposition voters. Still, the population clearly didn't cooperate in Friday's vote.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu