Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
  • Interview: An Iraq Vet Runs for Congress

    David Botti | Mar 5, 2008 12:57 PM
    Kieran Lalor is a former Marine reservist and Iraq veteran running for Congress in New York’s nineteenth district.  He’s also the founder of Iraq Vets for Congress, a group of 14 Republican, pro-war vets running in districts from Maine to California.  
     
    Lalor, 32, and I spent many years together as rifleman in the same infantry company based in upstate New York. We served in Iraq (although in different platoons), and experienced the military’s transition into wartime footing after 9/11.

    I spoke with Lalor about our shared military experiences, fallen comrades, his entry into politics, John McCain, and how he’s hoping to make 2008 the year of Republican war veterans elected to office. Excerpts:



    SOLDIER’S HOME: When we were over there in Iraq I barely thought about the politics of it all. I had some sense of what was going, but didn’t pay to much attention to it. Was it the same for you? When did you start really thinking hard about the political aspect of the war?

    LALOR: Officially my campaign began on November 25, 2007, but it really began on 9/11. One of my sisters worked in the north tower of the World Trade Center. On September 11th I was living in here in Westchester, about 40 miles from Ground Zero. I was watching TV with a year of reserve duty under my belt, so I was watching this as a U.S. Marine; watching our country get attacked, wondering if my sister was dead or alive.  I just felt helpless.  I didn’t ever want to feel that way again, and it just woke me up. I realized our generation had a big challenge.

    I went through the 90’s and everything was hunky dory: a prosperous economy, and at least the appearance of peace. I thought we were going to have a free ride. Our parents' generation had the Cold War, our grandparents had WWII and the depression. September 11th hit and I thought, "OK, our generation has some work to do."

    In Iraq I don’t think I really thought about the politics except that I just remember thinking of some of these pictures I had taken: the kids and the American flag, the kids running up to us, or hanging out by the gate [of our HQ]. If these scenes could have been brought home five years ago the impression of the war could’ve been different here. We got a lot of negative, and not a lot of positive.  

    It wasn’t Iraq so much as the wider War on Terror that got me to run. My passion became how do you secure a country of 300 million people, and protect civil liberties.


    Did anything specific happen while we were in Iraq that’s influenced your platform, or ideas about politics?

    One thing that informs my foreign policy view, and why I continue to support the war in Iraq, is how we were running patrols 24/7 out in the streets of Nasiriyah. We were being proactive. Well, the Italian [coalition forces] relieved us, and their doctrine was react to problems in the streets. And, they got hit [by a suicide bomber], and a good number of them died. I think that the Italian strategy of reacting, and staying home in the compound until something happened in the streets, was basically American foreign policy up until September 11th. On a small scale our [rifle company’s] doctrine of being proactive, and being omnipresent in the streets is what I believe is the best post-9/11 foreign policy.


    I asked Lalor about Lcpl Glover, a very good friend of his who was killed in Iraq in 2006.  Glover didn’t serve with us in Iraq, but he joined the unit later and volunteered for a subsequent deployment. He was killed along with another Marine from our unit during a sniper attack in Fallujah. I wrote about his funeral for a post on Veterans Day last year.

    Mike Glover was one of my best friends, and in some ways I feel responsible for getting him into the Marine Corps. I really feel like we owe it to all those guys, especially Glover because I knew him so well. I don’t want him to have died in vain. That happened three years after we got back, and his death really made me more resolved. I talked to Glover’s family a little bit about that aspect, and they don’t want his death to have been in vain. I’ve also gotten calls from Gold Star Mothers and Fathers saying thanks for carrying on my son’s legacy. It takes my breath away, and I take it seriously.

    I never talk about him in a political context. I’m comfortable talking about him to you because I know you. I told a story about him in a speech on Veterans Day, but I asked permission from his family to mention him. But, he kind of symbolizes all of the other guys [four marines from our unit killed in Iraq from 2004-2006]. What’s ironic is that they all volunteered, and didn’t have to go. It’s kind of eerie, but it says a lot.


    Why did you form the group Iraq Vets for Congress?

    To help individual campaigns. If there are veterans who vote because a guy is a fellow veteran, that individual person does that on his own. [I formed the group] because politics has become a millionaire's game. A high, high percentage of people in congress are millionaires. So, by joining forces with other veterans we’ve been able to get more national attention. We’re starting to break through nationally and what that does it raise our individual profiles. And, the biggest thing is fund raising. I have to raise more than a million dollars for this campaign. I have about a hundred thousand so far, and my opponent already has a million dollars.


    Does the fact that McCain, another Republican veteran, is also running have any affect on your individual campaigns?

    McCain always brings out a lot of veterans who vote. He’ll bring out a few thousand people that are veterans that don’t normally vote; that seems to be a trend. Also, because of Iraq Vets for Congress I’ve been contacted by the McCain campaign. What we offer him is 14 guys in districts where there’s no republican Congressman. There’s two guys in Ohio and two guys in Pennsylvania which are big states that you have to win. We can help him, and he can help us. Also, we try to hammer home that we want to make 2008 the year of the republican veteran. With McCain on the popular ticket, the 14 of us, some other Vietnam vets, and Gulf War vets running, that’s a theme we’re trying to build.

    A lot of people paint Republicans as chicken hawks: people who cheer lead for war, but don’t want to put their lives on the line. Our campaigns dispel that myth.


    Is there a danger of placing too much of your campaign’s emphasis on the fact you’re a veteran?

    I don’t think that’s enough to get somebody elected, but it definitely gets peoples' attention. There has to be a balance. You have to be more than just a guy who served in Iraq.


    What about the fact that you were a reservist? We were called up twice on relatively short notice, leaving behind or jobs, school, and families. What impact has that had on you?


    That kind of balancing act: living in a couple of different worlds and being well-rounded, is very helpful running for Congress. I’m not completely of the military mindset, which I think is good. Being half in the military world, and half in the civilian world gives you double the amount of perspective. I can see the other side: what it does to employers, and what it’s like trying to get back into the work force for example. Sometimes I’d go into interviews and I’d feel like I was sitting in that chair because this guy wanted someone to debate the Iraq war with–even though I had no chance of getting that job.


    How have people reacted on the campaign trail towards the fact that you’re a veteran?

    People have been pretty good.  There’s been positive feedback.  I don’t think it’s enough to get elected.  The Iraq war is a difficult issue for republicans, and every republican is going to have to deal with it.  And somebody who’s served in Iraq can deal with it better than anybody.  When I get questions about it I say, listen: I risked my life there, I lost friends there.  If I thought it wasn’t making our country safer I’d be the loudest voice saying that.  

    More
  • The Image of a Veteran

    David Botti | Feb 1, 2008 04:18 PM
    The current series in the New York Times on veterans who've committed murder has spurred tremendous debate over the way vets are portrayed by the media. To understand origins of the prevailing portrayals of our current veterans, it's a good idea to take a step back and view the issue in a historical perspective.

    Jerry Lembcke is a Vietnam veteran and professor of sociology at Holly Cross college in Worcester, Massachusetts. Lembcke's book "The Spitting Image: Myth, Memory, and the Legacy of Vietnam," looked in part at how the news media and pop-culture cultivated narrow portrayals of Vietnam vets. He has also written op-eds for the Boston Globe, Newsday, and the San Francisco Chronicle among others. In 1968 Lembcke was drafted into the Army, serving as chaplain's assistant before returning home and joining the anti-war movement.  

    I talked to Lembcke about how the Vietnam-era vets experience impacts that of those men and women coming home from war today -- and how he thinks the media is handling its coverage of veterans and issues associated with them.



    SOLDIER'S HOME: You've written that a veteran's behavior can be influenced more from how past vets were portrayed in pop-culture, as opposed to personal experiences he/she might have had.  How does this happen?


    LEMBCKE: The post-Vietnam popular culture representations of veterans was so powerful and so long lasting, and it so overwhelmed the war itself in popular culture, that as people began to come home during the Gulf War in the 1990’s, and present these same symptoms as Vietnam veterans coming back, I thought there’s a connection here. I think I used the phrase “learned experience,” and it occurred to me that this was a generation of veterans who’d grown up immersed in this popular culture of what it looks like to be a war veteran coming home.

    This was very different than the culture Vietnam vets grew up in. Looking at representations of WWII veterans for example, which was not nearly as powerful in film for example. We got more war films about WWII, but not so many films about veterans coming home.


    What is being portrayed in these kinds of movies that can influence veterans?
    More
  • Advertisement
  • A Stateside Army Medic on Treating Fellow Soldiers

    David Botti | Dec 18, 2007 11:59 AM

    I recently spoke by phone with a military friend who's currently a nursing student at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. He talked about how being with the war's wounded every day affects him, both on a human level and as someone who may be deployed to Iraq in the future. Of the scandal which broke last February at the hospital, he assumes the media blew it out of proportion and hasn't seen any negative conditions at the facility. 

    What's interesting about his words is how in some cases they could be applied to any civilian hospital worker in the country, and in others we see how his position as a soldier informs his experiences. As he is still on active duty in the Army, he's asked for anonymity. Excerpts:


    On working as a stateside medic and nursing student:

    Personally I’d say that you get to see another side of the war from being on the health care side. [The wounded soldiers] are treated with a lot of respect. They’re really cared for. On an emotional level sometimes the reality of it catches you. You try to be professional, but you’re still human. And sometimes it dawns on you the situation that person’s in is a very harsh one…There are situations that I’m very happy these people are alive and everything else, but sometimes you wonder if there are fates worse than death. 


    On his thoughts during off-duty time:

    I think off-duty I think about it more. I think about the possibility–you know, I wear the same uniform as they do. These guys are younger than us. They’re kids. It scares me because I know that I’m still gonna be in the Army until 2010, and I’m pretty sure I’m going back over [to Iraq]. And to be faced with that reality every day looking at the people you’re looking at, and knowing that this is a very indiscriminate war; knowing that you can be walking to the bathroom and just get hit by something in any kind of zone. It's guerrilla warfare. It’s ugly. Your chances are very good that you can be that guy. There’s a lot more people injured than are coming up dead. 


    On conversations with patients:

    They’re pretty honest about what happened, or what they remember–which they usually don’t. They’re usually like, “yeah, I was driving or doing this and then I woke up and I was in Germany.” They like to talk it out. They love to try to relate to you [as an Army soldier].


    On how he comforts a patient's fears:

    I think it’d be safe to say it’s kind of like, you know how us infantryman have that black humor. I think humor is one of the things I use. 


    On controlling his own fears:

    I think the biggest thing that affects me is my fears. I mean, honestly, I get nightmares and stuff. But I think that’s more my anxiety of what my future holds. Sometimes you just need to indulge in the work and do whatever it is to help that person. Sometimes you focus on that person, and that’s how you get by.


    On the worst he’s seen in a stateside military hospital:

    The burn ward–it was just gruesome, you know. Everything was rearranged and changed. They have pictures [of the soldiers beforehand]–you know, a family puts up pictures. It’s a common practice. You look at someone who’s burnt severely and it’s hard to ever imagine they’re a human. And then right next to that patient–that slab of meat, rearranged face, it’s almost monstrous–right next to that, only to make it more melancholy, is the picture of the young kid with his future ahead of him. Not to sound so cliché. But, you know that person has the future ahead of him. That look that says, ‘look at me I just joined the Army, I’ve got my new uniform, a young girlfriend.’ And they’re not kind of robbed, they’re a hundred percent robbed of that. I think that’s a dark reality right there. 


    On the best he’s seen:

    The best moment I’ve had was one of my first patients I had. I actually watched him for three weeks.  I took care of him. He was one of my harder cases, and I purposely took him for academic reasons. And I watched him go from being very immobile and sick–just looking like hell to now he’s talking.  That was powerful. You actually watch your accomplishment by giving care, you actually nourish something back to life.

    More
  • Thoughts of Marines from Iraq War's Beginning

    David Botti | Dec 14, 2007 02:02 PM
    During my deployment to Iraq in 2003 I kept a journal thinking someday, when I'm old and gray, I'd want to remember how things were back in the summer of '03. One section of this journal was comprised of interviews I did with Marines in my platoon over a period of two days. We'd been in Iraq less than three weeks, and so far had not moved from our initial position guarding a bridge in the middle of nowhere. 

    The interviews were not done for any journalistic purpose, but simply to get a sense of what other people in my platoon were thinking. I've posted excerpts below. One thing to keep in mind as you read them is the diversity of answers. Some of them may sound crass, but that's just the kind of black humor that gets you though the day. Also remember that at the time the war was less than a month old.
    More
  • A West Point Graduate on His Fifth Reunion

    David Botti | Nov 6, 2007 10:29 AM
    A West Point graduate and two-tour Iraq veteran, Matt Mabe recently returned to the military academy for his fifth-year reunion.  He left the Army as a Captain, and served as a combat engineer during his Iraq deployments. Matt and I are classmates in graduate school, and I recently interviewed him about his emotional return to West Point. Excerpts:

    S.H.: You served two tours in Iraq since graduating from West Point.  What was it like to return to your alma mater as a combat veteran?

    Matt Mabe: It’s funny. When I was a cadet, I would look at graduates returning for their reunions as people who had triumphed in life. Some still wore the uniform. Others had left the Army to pursue careers in civilian life. They all carried an air of accomplishment. They all seemed to have won the lottery of life.

    I always fantasized about returning one day as one of those content, successful, confident graduates I admired. And when I finally did make it back, I guess I played the part.

    It was Homecoming weekend. There was a tour and a parade. There were barbecues and a football game. There were thousands of cadets enjoying one day of respite in a punishing four-year experience. It was novel and pleasant.

    But, deep down, I felt empty. I began to think about those of my classmates who could not be there to share the experience with those of us who could.

    I thought of Todd Bryant, who was killed by a roadside bomb outside Fallujah on Halloween Day 2003 after only a few weeks on the ground. He had been married for two months.

    I thought of Jim Gurbisz, who suffered the same fate in Baghdad in November 2005. He was honored with a burial in Arlington National Cemetery.

    I thought of Drew Jensen, who was shot in the neck by a sniper in Baqubah in May, paralyzing him from the neck down. He had been trying to save one of his soldiers who was pinned behind a Humvee after a bomb explosion. Last month, Drew asked his wife and mother to take him off life support. Before having his final wish granted, he donated $10,000 to Walter Reed Army Medical Center to establish a fund to help families cover expenses while visiting their wounded loved ones.

    I thought about the values that the academy imbued in all of us over four grueling years. Things like Loyalty, Selfless Service, Honor.

    I felt proud to have once walked the same halls as these men. It comforted me to think that their souls will always dwell among those hallowed grounds.

    I am haunted by the sacrifices that thousands of Americans like them have made. The faces of the cadets I saw at my reunion reminded me of the innocence they will soon lose when they, too, are thrown against the guns.

    And my heart broke for my country.


    What are your last memories of West Point as a cadet?
    More
  • Sexual Assault in the Ranks

    David Botti | Nov 5, 2007 05:51 PM
    The Veterans Administration recently announced the opening of a new treatment facility for female veterans. When it opens in December, the New Jersey facility will be the only residential treatment center in the country exclusively treating women with... More
  • Interview: Ken Burns on WWII Vets [Part 3]

    David Botti | Nov 2, 2007 10:11 AM

    Today's post is the last in a three-part series of interviews with filmmaker Ken Burns.  His 15-hour documentary, "The War," looked at life on the battlefield and homefront during WWII. Excerpts: 

    S.H.: What was it like living with the images of war for six years during the making of the film?

    BURNS: It was very very tough. I mean we like to say, and it’s a dishonor to anyone within the sound of my voice who’s actually experienced combat, to say we used to have kind of our own minor versions of PTSD because we had to look at horrible footage. We looked at thousands of hours of footage to get our 15 hours of film. We looked at tens of thousands of still photographs, some of the most gruesome carnage.  And while our film is difficult to watch, and shows in an unmitigated, unmediated fashion the horror of war, nonetheless it isn’t the worst we’ve seen.  

    We didn’t want to gratuitously shock anybody. There are difficult images, but we left the most difficult images of children, of women, of soldiers deeply maimed, guts spilling out on the battlefield, of the worst kind of depravity that takes place in war, out of our film. But we ourselves had to find out what it was like. And we’d often, many of us, recount the stories of in the editing process, the long solitary editing process, of going home at night and dreaming--finding ourselves not just filmmakers in the editing room trying to solve the problems of the Battle of Peleliu, for example, or the Battle of the Bulge, but finding ourselves in that battle.  [We were] realizing, ‘wait a second, we’re filmmakers without guns--why are we here?’ And waking up in cold sweats with nightmares, coming in hollow-eyed with sleep and finding out the editor, or producer across the table had felt the same thing, or something similar in a different battle.

    It was very difficult, but what kept us going, and I don’t mean to play up any real difficulties--we had the luxury of being at home, none of us were called up to do the actual fighting that takes place--is that we were compelled along, carried along, buoyed by the stories that we had collected.  [From] the 40-odd people that we’d gotten to know intimately, people we’d said in our early boiler plate language paid lip service to the notion that these people would be like family members, somebody you might have had Thanksgiving with. By the end I can tell you that they do feel like family members. We lost Earl Burke. We lost Ray Leopold in the last few months.  And we all felt a great deal of sadness as if someone really close to us had died. With Ray Leopold, from Waterbury, I actually broke down and cried, as if it had been my own grandfather.

    [Part 1] [Part 2]

    More
  • Interview: Ken Burns on WWII Vets [Part 2]

    David Botti | Nov 1, 2007 10:56 AM
    Yesterday Soldier’s Home posted the first in a three-part series of interview excerpts from a discussion with filmmaker Ken Burns.  His new seven-part documentary, "The War," follows the WWII generation on the battlefields and on the home front.  In the previous post we learned how Burns went about interviewing veterans on the emotional subject of their wartime experiences.  Today’s excerpts:

    S.H.: One of the veterans said something in the film that really struck me.  He said, “you don’t expect death among people your own age.”  

    BURNS:  Yes, that was Sam Hynes who is professor emeritus of literature from Princeton University.  Sam got it very very well.  What happens is that young men do the fighting because they’re the ones who particularly have a sense of their own immortality, their own invincibility.  That’s why most car accidents are teenagers, 17 or 18-years-old, who think they can drive as fast as they want and [then] can’t make that turn.  And we read the tragedies almost daily in our newspapers.  

    We actually enlist young men to do the fighting and the dying, because they have that willingness to do the stuff that we just look back and say I can’t believe he’d do that.  I think [Sam] began to understand that moment that other soldiers described of arriving going, ‘I have no fear, but when the fighting started, yikes, what have I gotten into.’  

    Here is this notion that as the war began to grind on in the first year, and the casualties mounted, that this was a real thing.  Only old people, he said, die.  But, suddenly people your own age were dying and it wasn’t too far a leap to realize that you too may die.  And then all of the sudden that limitlessness that we feel, however myopically, that we’re going to live forever is suddenly very really ripped from you.  And war becomes a wholly different thing.  ‘Yes I could die.  We’re all gonna die.  But it’s gonna to happen to grandpa and great-grandpa, it’s not gonna happen to me.'

    This is a huge metaphysical calculus that we couldn’t possibly really truly understand, and we hope by approaching war to get a sense, get a glimmer of what it’s like. 

    S.H.: I’ve heard from some veterans of the current war that sometimes they’re uncomfortable with the fact that it defines them.  They are defined as veterans of the Iraq war.  Did you find anything similar among WWII vets?

    BURNS:
    Well no, I think that we’re dealing with this unbelievably powerful, healing, and merciless thing called time.  That these guys came back from the Second World War, didn’t want to be defined by it, and basically shut up.  We’re a non-therapeutic society, nobody really wants to know the answer to the question, ‘what did you do in the war Daddy, or son.’  They just don’t want to really know what happens: ‘well, I just turned around and my best friend, a guy I wish you could know – my very best friend in the world, I just watched his head get blown off.’  You can’t tell your mom you can’t tell your pop.  You lock it away and you get on with life.  

    Towards the end of your life you begin to realize how much you were defined by that.  That who you were, good and bad, and otherwise, is defined by an experience of war.

    When Quentin Aanenson on the stage of the Lincoln Theater in Washington, D.C. a few weeks ago mentioned that with each “Star-Spangled Banner” [he heard], he went through the list of his close friends who died, he was in the presence of a Vietnam War veteran and an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran.  When he finished, nearly in tears, the Iraq veteran turned to him and said, ‘Quentin, I feel like you are an echo of me, or I am an echo of you.  That we are the same thing.’  It was as if it were the grandfather, the son, and the grandson that we had there.

    [Part 1]

    More
  • Interview: Ken Burns on WWII Vets [Part 1]

    David Botti | Oct 31, 2007 10:06 AM
    Last month filmmaker Ken Burns debuted his seven-part World War II documentary on PBS, "The War," an epic chronicle of combat and home front experiences. I spoke with him this week at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism about working with veterans during the six years of production on the film. Today’s is the first post in a multi-part series. Excerpts:

    S.H.: For The Veterans History Project you gave advice to regular people interviewing veterans in their own families.  You talked about establishing a “comfort zone” for the interview.  How did you do this with vets you interviewed for The War?

    BURNS: What we look for at the essence of an interview is free exchange. We aren’t investigative journalists. We aren’t there with their tax returns for the last ten years grilling them. This dynamic is most critical when you’re interviewing veterans, because quite often you’re dealing with people who have, understandably, locked away horrific things that they’ve seen, and horrific things that they’ve done–and people they’ve had close to them that they’ve lost.

    You have to be respectful and mindful of the fact that they may not get there. That they may not reveal that. And there’s no amount of trickery or cajolery worth it to try to do that.  

    So, what we look for is to film them in a comfortable situation. To do so in places where they feel comfortable, to be non-threatening, but to also pursue questions, and not just have a rigorous set of questions, so that you might miss following up on something that was quite meaningful.

    A particular veteran [Quentin Aanenson] in our films said “I loved airplane flying when I was a kid, that’s where I want to go–that’s where I want to be sometime.”  But if you watch his eye crinkles you know that’s not where he wanted to be.  That what he saw when he eventually became a pilot was so horrible. And so we moved–we just tested him, and he gave up stuff his wife had never heard, his children had never heard before. Maybe I missed lots of stuff he would’ve told me.  

    I was with him in a public discussion a year after we finished the film, and he told us something he had never said on film: that he’s lived outside of Washington D.C. for the last 50 years, and every time he and his son went to a Washington Redskins football game, as he was singing "The Star-Spangled Banner," he went through all the friends that he lost in the war. He never told his son, never told anyone else, and as he began to tear up in an audience of his sons and all the other people, you began to realize that you were present once again at the very thing you hope to have, not just with veterans but with anybody.

    Particularly with veterans because they are getting at the dynamic of combat and a war–the most exaggerated state that human beings get.  Not something that’s distant, but something that’s present.

    This is a guy who wakes up most every night from nightmares, from the Second World War, done for him for 60 years, with his hands in a palsy, in a shake because he’s remembering the time when he caught some Germans out in the open and was cutting human beings in half with his 50mm machine guns off his Thunderbolt [fighter plane].

    He still has this. His wife always reads him as he comes into the kitchen, and will sometimes hand the cup of coffee to the other hand.  

    Sometimes I found with a veteran [Paul Fussell], a man who’s actually written about war, and is known as kind of a well-spoken and avuncular chronicler of the human experience of war–I found myself saying, 'I’m not interested in that.'  

    I’m interested in you as a 19-year-old lieutenant on the line whose average life expectancy was 17 days, and you didn’t take a shower, or brush your teeth, or change your clothes in six months. And you outlived those odds until you were severely wounded, and they moved you to the head of the line, and patched you up for the invasion of Japan which fortunately did not happen otherwise you would’ve gone mad.  

    I just said to him at some point early on “you saw bad things.”
    More
  • Interview: Love and Two Sides of a Deployment (Part 2)

    David Botti | Oct 18, 2007 10:45 AM

    Earlier in the week I interviewed Erica, the wife of Jim, a fellow Marine from my old unit. I asked about her experiences being in a relationship with Jim while he was deployed to Iraq in 2003. Today we have my interview with Jim. Among the things he talks about is leaving her a knife to keep at home, family drama, and a surge of anger while eating at a diner. 

    S.H.: You became engaged shortly before deploying to Iraq. How did the deployment influence your decision?
     
    Jim: It definitely pushed up the time frame. I had purchased the ring, but was waiting for the right time to give it to her. When I heard that we were getting deployed, it seemed like the right time.


    S.H.: In the days leading up to your deployment, what types of conversations were you having about your relationship?

     
    Jim: I recall not really wanting to talk about it. I was willing to go, but didn't want to deal with the goodbyes. So, I pretty much pretended like it was known to be an absolute certainty that everything would be alright. She would say something to me, and I would brush it off with a simple "everything will be fine."


    S.H.: How did being in a relationship back home influence your morale during the deployment?
    More
  • Interview: Love and Two Sides of a Deployment (Part 1)

    David Botti | Oct 16, 2007 09:50 AM
    NEWSWEEKS’s recent cover story on marriages between Iraqis and Americans, prompted me to take another look at relationships and war.  I called upon my good friend Jim, a fellow Marine Reservist who served with me throughout two mobilizations.

    I saw many relationships between Marines and their significant others fail in dramatic ways. One Marine was told by his fiancée at our welcome home ceremony from Iraq that she’d been cheating on him the entire time he was deployed. The wedding was off.

    Jim and his wife, Erica, college sweethearts, were among those couples that made it.  They remained together throughout Jim's two reserve mobilizations, and were married in 2006.

    What follows is an email interview with Erica about her relationship experiences during the deployment. In the next few days I’ll be posting my interview with Jim.
    More
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu