A round-up of this morning's must-read stories.
OBAMA TAKES THE OFFENSIVE VS. MCCAIN
(Scott Helman, Boston Globe)
Senator Barack Obama is kicking off his general election campaign in aggressive fashion, leveling daily, hard-hitting attacks on Republican John McCain designed to capitalize on the stark policy differences between them. Forgoing a softer introduction to the broader electorate, Obama and his advisers have decided to go right at McCain, calculating that the candidates' major distinctions on issues such as tax relief, the war in Iraq, and diplomacy play to their favor. They see an opening with President Bush's low approval ratings, the public wanting a fresh foreign policy approach, and American families feeling increasingly squeezed by high gasoline and food prices. The forceful tack is a departure from 2004, when Senator John F. Kerry, as he transitioned from the Democratic primary race to the fall campaign, sought to burnish his commander-in-chief credentials and downplay criticism of the president. It also serves notice to Democrats that Obama, despite vows to lead a new era of conciliatory politics, will not shy away from harsh critiques of McCain and his positions.
THE REFORMERS AS FUNDRAISERS
(Matthew Mosk and Michael D. Shear, Washington Post)
Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain
are turning their undivided attention to the general election this
week, loading their schedules with fundraising events that will fuel
their campaign through the summer. But advisers to the White House
hopefuls are also working feverishly to square their carefully crafted
images as campaign finance reformers with the need to gather tens of
millions of dollars. For McCain (R-Ariz.), that meant opening his fundraising events to
reporters and television cameras for the first time, ending what had
been a strict closed-door policy when the candidate mingled with
donors. For Obama (D-Ill.), it meant passing up the chance to sock away
funds for the general election and continue to collect only half the
amount he is legally allowed as he dashes to fundraisers in New York,
Philadelphia, St. Louis, Los Angeles and Jacksonville, Fla., in the
next two weeks. Aides to Obama said that for now he will continue to
forgo the chance to raise $2,300 per donor for the general election on
top of the money he is raising for his primary-season account. Obama's campaign has delayed a decision on whether to accept public
financing for the general election, but top donors and aides have urged
him to become the first candidate in three decades to turn down public
funds.
BARACK OBAMA IS THE $100 MILLION MAN
(Alexander Bolton, The Hill)
Leading Democratic fundraisers predict that Sen. Barack Obama
(D-Ill.) will raise hundreds of millions of dollars over the next few
months if he opts out of public financing and begins raising money for
the general election. Specifically, they say Obama could
raise $100 million in June and could attract 2.5 million to 3 million
new donors to his campaign. These fundraisers say Obama could increase his fundraising dramatically
because of three factors: a boost of enthusiasm among Obama donors
following his clinching of the nomination; the migration of Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) donors to his camp; and the
mobilization of big Democratic donors who have given little so far this
year. Record-breaking projections give Obama strong
incentive to pass up $85 million in public funds that his opponent,
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), has said he would accept. The question of whether to accept public financing has become a
quandary for Obama. He appeared to pledge earlier in the campaign that
he would if the Republican nominee did the same. Obama’s aides now
claim he merely pledged to “pursue” a fundraising agreement with the
Republican nominee.
RECORD GAS PRICES COULD HURT MCCAIN
(David Paul Kuhn, Politico)
More Americans now view energy as a serious concern than at the low
point of the 1979 energy crisis, according to a Politico analysis of
historical Gallup Polls. And the percentage of voters who consider
energy issues “very important” in determining their vote has also risen
dramatically since the last election, from 54 percent in October 2004
to 77 percent in a recent poll
released by The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press — a
percentage point increase nearly double that of any other issue...Thus far, it’s McCain
who has most suffered from that irritation. On an issue that three in
four registered voters believe will be “very important” in making their
“decision about who to vote for this fall” — a greater portion of
voters than those who cite terrorism, moral values or the war in Iraq —
Pew shows Republicans lagging Democrats by 15 percentage points on who
will give “greater priority” to energy. While McCain’s bid for the
presidency is likely dependent on his ability to outperform the
unpopular Republican brand, the same poll shows him trailing the GOP on
the issue. He trails Obama by an even larger margin, 18 percentage points, among voters asked which candidate would better “deal” with the energy issue.
HILLARY'S FINAL CURTAIN
(Rebecca Traister, Salon)
Like it or not, Hillary Rodham Clinton was the first female
battering ram to rattle the Oval Office door, and while sorrowful
Hillary-heads may lyrically and lovingly catalog her many achievements,
her bravery and grace, I'd prefer to think of her as she actually has
been: a pain in the ass to support, an often inept and ungainly
campaigner. She was ill-behaved, she made mistakes, and waged an often
dirty and tone-deaf campaign, performing precious few electoral
pirouettes. But she also pulverized any quaint notions of what
presidential races are supposed to look like and how girls might
compete in them... And, yes, it's terrific that generations of little girls will grow
up knowing that women can run for president. But count me as gratified
that those who do so will also know they are not responsible for
bearing the highest expectations for their gender's morality and
politesse, because one hell of a difficult dame has been there before
them and knocked everybody around pretty hard.
FOR CLINTON, MILLIONS IN CAMPAIGN DEBT AND LIMITED OPTIONS
(Michael Luo, New York Times)
With her campaign now officially suspended, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
is confronting still another challenge: whittling down what is believed
to be the largest presidential campaign debt in history. Besides the $11.4 million of her own money that Mrs. Clinton lent her
campaign, she had about $9.5 million in unpaid bills to vendors at the
end of April, according to her most recent filing with the Federal Election Commission... Mrs. Clinton’s options for retiring her debt are limited... The
most discussed option is for Mr. Obama, now the presumed nominee, to
encourage his fund-raising team to help her with a series of joint
events... Several Obama fund-raisers interviewed, however, said privately that
they believed helping Mrs. Clinton with her debt would be difficult,
given that they are also being asked to raise money for Mr. Obama and
to build up the coffers of the Democratic National Committee, which badly trails the Republican National Committee in cash on hand. They also pointed out that some Obama donors would find it difficult to
overcome the animosity they had built up during a long, hard-fought
primary season.
IS THE WORLD READY FOR A BLACK AMERICAN PRESIDENT?
(Anne Applebaum, Slate)
President Obama wouldn't have to worry too much about angry stares
from people at bus stops, of course, and it is fair to assume that
prejudices harbored by the odd foreign leader will vanish in the
presence of the U.S. president. In the rosiest scenario, an Obama
presidency—or just an Obama candidacy—might even force a broader
international discussion of race. Last year, Andrew Sullivan wrote
eloquently about the way in which Obama's face, just by itself, will help change America's image around the world. By
the same token, candidate Obama—merely by being who he is and looking
like what he looks like—could begin to change European, Arab, and Asian
attitudes about race. Millions of Africans would surely treat a U.S.
president of African descent as "their" president, just for a start. But
in the meantime, do not be surprised if there is some backlash. A hint
of what might be hiding behind those enthusiastic headlines emerged
last week in Obamamanic Germany, where Die Tageszeitung, a Berlin newspaper, put a photograph of the White House and the headline "Uncle Barack's Cabin" on its front page.
The editors argued that their intention was satirical, but since the
same newspaper has also referred to the current U.S. secretary of state
as "Uncle Tom's Rice," it is clear that they understood the nastiness
of the "Uncle Tom" connotation perfectly well.
BARACK OBAMA'S VICTORY STIRS MISSISSIPPI GHOSTS
(Faye Fiore, Los Angeles Times)
Much has changed here since African Americans like Sylvia Campbell, now
74, were told they couldn't vote unless they correctly answered how
many bubbles were in a bar of soap. But
much is the same. For all the excitement about Barack Obama and his
history-making run for president, there is anxiety, too, because the
present is still a hostage to the past. Everything in this slow town of
one-way streets and more than 80 churches is viewed through the lens of
race. Obama's success makes some people as anxious as it makes others
proud... Racial tensions are not as violently
overt as they were then; today the slights are subtle, from the glance
averted on the street to the job application that is never considered.
With five months of fierce presidential campaigning ahead -- black
against white -- there is a sense that simmering racial tensions are
about to boil again. "What happened all those years ago -- that just keeps coming up," said
Doris Gray, 81, who is white. The presence of an out-of-town newspaper
reporter in her son's chili cafe not 24 hours after Obama cinched the
nomination confirmed her fear that people are going to start poking
around in matters better left be.
OBAMA VETTER DRAWS UNWANTED SCRUTINY
(Lisa Lerer, Politico)
[Jim Johnson's] circumspect ways – rare in a town known for its shameless attention
seekers – have helped make the reserved Minnesotan one of Washington’s
most influential powerbrokers and an early pick by the Obama campaign
to handle the sensitive search for a running mate. Yet despite Johnson’s legendary fastidiousness, his high-profile
campaign role has suddenly exposed him to questions about his financial
dealings. The questions range from his relationship with the embattled
CEO of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial to his more recent
oversight roles on various corporate compensation committees that
approved hefty executive pay packages. In a presidential campaign where the subprime mortgage crisis and high
corporate salaries figure to be staples of debate, Johnson is now at
risk of becoming a political liability for Obama, who’s trying to sell
anxious voters on an economic message that calls for stricter financial
industry regulation and ridding Washington of special favors and tax
breaks for wealthy CEOs.
PRO-CHOICE DEMOCRATS AND JOHN MCCAIN
(Froma Harrop, Providence Journal)
Hillary Clinton's blessing notwithstanding, many of the New York senator's supporters will resist the handover to Barack Obama... A big sticking point for wavering Democrats will be McCain's
position on reproductive rights. Clinton's backers are overwhelmingly
pro-choice, and they'll want to know this: Would McCain stock the
Supreme Court with foes of Roe v. Wade?... The answer is unclear but probably "no." While McCain has
positioned himself as "pro-life" during this campaign, his statements
over the years show considerable latitude on the issue. In a 1999 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board, McCain said, "I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America" to undergo "illegal and dangerous operations."... [But] addressing conservative South Carolinians last year, McCain said that Roe should
be overturned. Primary politics or a change of mind? The former is my
guess -- and also that in his current pursuit of Hillary Democrats we
may see a softening of that position. Whatever McCain really thinks, the chances that he would submerge
his presidency in the maelstrom of abortion politics seem slim.
Partisan battles over court nominees aren't his thing, either.
MAD SKILLS: THE UPSIDE OF JIM WEBB'S ANGER
(Eve Fairbanks, New Republic)
The interesting thing about the angry-Webb
mythology, though, is that it fascinates just as much as it frightens.
Fellow Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill adoringly described Webb as
a "street brawler," capturing the way some Democrats--call them the Jim
Webb Orientalists--romanticize Webb's aggressive, exotically redneck
roots and, by extension, his capacity to hormonally invigorate a party
sick of its effete, wine-sipping image... And the specific trajectory of Webb's political anger--he's a former
Republican now raging against a "Republican Party that continually
seeks to politicize military service" and CEOs "openly consumed by
self-justifying greed"--is powerfully appealing, too. He embodies the
liberal fantasy laid out by Thomas Frank in What's the Matter With Kansas?:
that blue-collar whites will stop being mad at liberals for frowning at
their guns and start being mad at conservatives for raping their
pocketbooks. His emotional journey is the same one liberals want
lower-class whites to undergo en masse. For these reasons, Jim Webb's anger would seem to make him an
especially powerful vice-presidential choice for the refined and
white-working-class-alienating Barack Obama. But the researchers
vetting Obama's shortlist must be vexed by a question: Is Jim Webb a
vessel for the kind of righteous indignation the Democrats need--or is
he just too angry to be vice president?
A LIST BIDEN BELONGS ON
(E.J. Dionne, Washington Post)
Why Biden? In part because of where he took our discussion: Few
Democrats know more about foreign policy, and few would so relish the
fight against McCain on international affairs. Few are better placed to
argue that withdrawal from Iraq will strengthen rather than weaken the
United States. The worst thing in a running mate is the fear of muddying his or her image in political combat. Biden would be a happy warrior. He was born in Scranton, Pa., an essential state for Democrats, and has been a regular in the Philadelphia media market. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell,
himself a plausible No. 2, has called Biden "a perfect fit." The
senator has been through two of his own presidential campaigns, in
which he experienced what an acquaintance of his called the "white-hot
heat" of scrutiny. Biden is Catholic and hails from a blue-collar world, two constituencies with which Obama needs help. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and former chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
Biden speaks with real learning on international affairs and the
judiciary -- the next vacancies on the Supreme Court should be a big
issue in this campaign -- while never sounding like an elitist.