Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Monday, July 21, 2008 2:25 PM

In Baghdad, More Good News for Obama

Andrew Romano

 
Thaier al-Sudani / Getty Images-pool

Here's a dispatch from Larry Kaplow and Lennox Samuels in Baghdad: 

Sen. Barack Obama got a red-carpet greeting in the Green Zone. The Democratic presidential contender, who was in Baghdad Monday, was seated one-on-one with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki at the end of his marble-lined salon, while Obama's senate colleagues sat at the side with the aides. But the greatest gesture of Iraqi hospitality came just after Obama and the Americans had zipped off in their convoy of armored SUVs. Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh told a scrum of the assembled press that the Iraqi government hopes U.S. combat troops can go home by the end of 2010 – perhaps leaving advisers and trainers behind. It puts the Iraqis' schedule – or at least in their publicly-stated preference—close to the mid-2010 date that Obama has proposed. And it is a timeline–something the Bush administration has opposed until just last Friday, when it allowed that a "time horizon" might be plausible.

Advertisement

Maliki aides brushed off questions about whether the date was discussed by the prime minister and the presidential contender during their talks. Also sitting in the meeting were key administration figures on IraqU.S. Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker and top adviser for Iraq David Satterfield, as well as Republican Senator Chuck Hagel and Democratic Senator Jack Reed, D-RI. But the 2010 timeline seemed to catch embassy staff off guard later as they called back to verify the comment when NEWSWEEK requested an American response. They could be expected to be a little frustrated. Maliki's office had spent much of the weekend trying to clarify his stand on troop withdrawals after a German magazine reported that he endorsed Obama's timeframe – an apparent break with President George W. Bush, who has been a staunch Maliki supporter.

There's growing support within Maliki's Shiite Muslim constituency for a timetable on a U.S. departure as the government seeks to consolidate power without interference from outside. But Maliki surely also realizes that, for now, he relies on American backing—most recently seen in March with the crucial support U.S. troops gave his forces when they faced tough fighting the southern city of Basra. Maliki could also be hedging his bets in case Obama is the next president.

Either way, perhaps it's no surprise that Obama strode out of the hour-long meeting with Maliki calling it "a very constructive discussion." The candidate made no other comment at the time but was expected to do a television interview later tonight—perhaps the only in-depth exchange he will have with media while on the Iraq leg of this week's Middle East and European tour.

READ THE REST HERE.  
 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: chuckhasker@yahoo.com (July 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM)

According to Andrew Romano and Stumper: The above article was posted on Stumper from; Here's a dispatch from Larry Kaplow and Lennox Samuels in Baghdad: "Sen. Barack Obama got a red-carpet greeting in the Green Zone" The article paints a perfect presidential photo of Obama and President Maliki  discussing a troop withdrawl timetable from Iraq. However according to PFC Cory Kenfield, (who happens to be boots on the ground,) in an article on Newsweeks bloggers site  Checkpoint Baghdad and Soldier's Home, for NEWSWEEK bloggers Larry Kaplow (our Baghdad bureau chief), PFC Cory said "He'll (Obama) probably go to the Green Zone and say he hung out with the troops.  When really all he'd be doing is hanging out with mechanics and colonels," PFC Cory Kenfield said (this because) of the general absence of infantry troops in the Green Zone. It seems Obama is looking for Photo ops and deal making for his future position as president rather than actually discovering what is actually developing on the ground. Is Obama  seeking the truth or making deals that will effect his future when it comes to Iraq? i Would like to remind Senator Obama that he is not the President of the United States as of this date. Chuck Hasker


Posted By: Sashland (July 21, 2008 at 6:11 PM)

bayoustuff

Are you saying that the CIA lied to Bush in the NIE when it wrote Iraq had WNDs and was continuing efforts to build more? Have you read the NIE and the (agreed as a group) conclusions of the intelligence agencies? Yah, didn't think so...

Have you read the Deulfer Report? The CIA reported AFTER THE WAR, that Sadamm had bio and chem labs that were never discovered by the UN inspections, and that these labs had conducted "testing" on humans? Read the section about 'Pesticide factories' and considered dual use, as previously employed in the Iran/Iraq War? Yah, didn't think so...

What next, you're going to claim that sanctions would have worked if we had just waited, longer, again, and that the the Oil for Food corruption was a plot of the rogue Bush Administration to make Iraq look bad. That right, you probably didn't ever read about the $10 billion stolen from babies mouths under the guise of humanitarian aid, all the while blaming Bush for starving babies.

This is the stuff of dangerous delusions: like making up quotes about how Al Maliki agrees with the Obama timeline and then having it parroted by obamaniacs as the TRUTH. Maliki was being polite; what he probably wanted to tell him  was "You dumb a**, what were you trying to do with that "withdraw by March 2008 BS, get all of us in the Iraq government killed?"

"faulty premise" my rear exit.

Where is the newsweek correction?


Posted By: bayoustuff (July 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM)

Sashland.... If the US followed Obama's advice, we would have never waged this war!!  Do you remember the faulty premise that launched this war?? Does "weapons of mass destruction" ring a bell?  There were no weapons found ... this was a ploy by the rogue Bush Administration.  Senator Obama's presence globally will give the US a far better image than we have now!