Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Monday, July 28, 2008 5:22 PM

Can Minority Journalists Cover Obama Objectively?

Andrew Romano

By April Yee 

CHICAGO—Before democratic nominee Barack Obama spoke to hundreds of minority journalists on Sunday, two Dallas Morning News reporters made a private bet.

Holly Yan wagered 40 percent of the audience at the UNITY: Journalists of Color Inc. convention would stand to applaud Obama, though most of the 2,000 there represented media organizations that promise objective campaign coverage. Political reporter Gromer Matthew Jeffers was more cynical, putting a sandwich at stake with his 70 percent bet. As Obama met backstage with the leaders of the minority journalism associations, Jeffers and the audience waited, hushed.

Out came Obama, who with one sauntering step into the theater handed victory to Jeffers. Most in the audience (which also included civilian supporters, event sponsors and Obama's friends and family) stood and clapped. And after fielding journalists' questions—many of them critical, such as The Miami Herald's Leonard Pitts Jr. on whether Obama had gone "too far" in refuting rumors he was a Muslim—Obama strolled off with another standing ovation. Audience members rushed to the rope separating the political rock star from the journalists.

Watching from afar, Yan found the enthusiasm of some of the attendees "grossly inappropriate." The decision to clap or not to clap was not merely fodder for Miss Manners. Many journalists there wondered: What kind of reception would have had John McCain? (He had also been invited to speak.) The question of objectively covering a candidate of such historial proportions has plagued reporters of this election, to the point that 49 percent of Americans polled by Rasmussen Reports now believe the press was on Obama's side. But minority journalists face additional questions on whether they can objectively cover the man who could become the first minority president--questions that, some point out, were rarely asked of women covering Hillary Clinton, or Catholics covering Kennedy.

"That mindset needs to change," said Ernest Suggs, a reporter for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and a vice president of the National Association of Black Journalists. "It is offensive that because we have the same color or the same agenda, our journalistic ethics and responsibilities go out the window."

At the UNITY convention, some journalists' compared the apparent enthusiasm of their colleagues to the coziness at the annual White House Correspondents' Association dinner, where the president is invited and often poked fun at. The relationship between the head of state and the press, viewed only on that night, could also be interpreted as positive, even if coverage is not.

Les Payne, a Pulitzer winner at Newsday who is black, said black journalists could cover Obama not just fairly, but also critically. "The job of the black journalist in covering Barack Obama isn't to protect Barack Obama," he said. "We have to assume then that we are not in his pocket, that we are not beholden to him, that we are not in his swoon."
 

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Dutch40 (July 30, 2008 at 4:28 PM)

This statistical data from the primary race explains that colored support sustains his candidacy and his lack of other ethnic anglo support will prove problematic come fall; yet no Presstitute member will acknowlegde this certainty:

White guilt politics doesn't translate to votes.  "20% of poor whites in WV won't vote for Obama because he is Black?"  How about, 90% of blacks in almost every state HAVE voted for him citing color as the reason...makes his candidacy equally sad.

March 4 - April 20 He recieved over 85 - 90% of the colored vote and they only made up at highest 35% of the voting population.

Sources:

Vote percentages -- Ohio, Texas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Indiana, North Carolina, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon.

African-American (AA) percentages of population -- Wikipedia entries for the various states.

AA percentage of total turnout -- Mostly from the FiveThirtyEight.com blog; most recent figures are best estimates based on previous primaries


Posted By: Dutch40 (July 30, 2008 at 4:19 PM)

What these so called colored journalists won't acknowledge One party rule has proved absolutely disastrous for the black community.  

Liberal Democrats  represent 315 major urban cities in the country; and just look at the financial, social, and economic disaster created in : Detroit, Atlanta, Camden, Baltimore, St. Louis, Gary, Flint, West Palm Beach, Miami New Orleans et al; one nexus...all led by liberal Democrats. (http://www.morganquitno.com/cit00dang.htm)

Those outside colored lineage, are afraid to acknowledge or are ignorant of the fact that for nearly a century and a half colored pauperism pimps in association with white liberals have chartered a cottage industry of victimhood that has enriched lives, portfolios and elevated careers; thereby rendering colored people...a whore visited only in election years.


Posted By: Dutch40 (July 30, 2008 at 4:16 PM)

I'm a southern, veteran, federalist, conservative male black  who won't support Sen. Obama for legitimate reasons.  He has illustrated a inadequate breadth of constitutional wisdom, an infantile geopolitical comprehension of foreign policy, military readiness/force projection, and economic security which is perilously disquieting.  Additionally, Mr. Obama's black nationalist (socialist/Marxist) indoctrination (Rev. Wright) and vacuous record foretell security, economic and social disaster for the country.