Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, August 20, 2008 6:11 PM

Ad Hawk: Inside Obama's "High-Low" TV Campaign

Andrew Romano

If you don't live in one of this year's dozen or so swing states (like most of the rest of the electorate), chances are you've encountered Barack Obama and John McCain mainly through the television screen--or, more specifically, through their combined $11 million investment in ads airing nationally during NBC's coverage of the Beijing Olympics. In which case, all you're seeing of Obama is his dream of "putt[ing] the middle class ahead of corporate interests" and his desire to "create five million jobs [by] developing home-grown energy technologies." And all you're seeing of McCain is... well, not much. The majority of McCain's record-setting $6 million ad buy went into airing "Painful," an ad mocking Obama's "life in the spotlight" while claiming that "the real Obama" is "not ready to lead." Given that Team McCain has spent much of the summer seeking free media exposure with limited-release spots comparing Obama to Paris Hilton--and releasing attack ads riddled with inaccuracies-- you'd think that only the Arizona senator has indulged in negative messaging, leaving his opponent from Illinois to travel the high road all by his lonesome.

You'd be wrong. As the New York Times reported this morning, Obama "has started a sustained and hard-hitting advertising campaign against Senator John McCain in states that will be vital this fall, painting Mr. McCain in a series of commercials as disconnected from the economic struggles of the middle class." So why haven't you heard anything about them? Because unlike a traditional campaign, Team Obama has "begun the drive with little fanfare, often eschewing the modern campaign technique of unveiling new spots for the news media before they run in an effort to win added (free) attention." The point, of course, is to preserve the perception that Obama is a "new kind of politician" on national level while still scoring "old politics"-style points against his rival in the places it matters most. According to the Campaign Media Analysis Group, for example, Obama’s campaign spent nearly $400,000 Sunday to run two anti-McCain spots more than 600 times, accounting for roughly two thirds of his commercials for the day--a number that didn't quite match McCain's 85-percent negative rating over the same period, but came closer than most casual voters would expect. “If you can go quietly negative, that’s what he’s done,” CMAG president Evan Tracey told the Times. “I think the perception is that he’s still running the positive campaign. It’s a pretty smart, high-low, good cop/bad cop strategy."

In the past--as recently as 2004, even--it would've pretty difficult for a voter in, say, Brooklyn to get any sense of what was airing in Dayton. But now we have YouTube. Scouring the site, I've compiled a playlist of all the videos in Obama's quiet, ongoing anti-McCain onslaught--for your non-swing-state viewing pleasure. This isn't to suggest that Obama is going "more negative" than McCain (he's not, especially because most of his focus on "the issues"), or even that his "high-low" strategy is somehow unwise (frankly, attack ads work--and I can imagine many Democrats are pleased to see their man finally "hitting back.") But the fact remains that before Aug. 4, Obama's only "negative" ads bemoaned McCain's "low-road campaign" and came in direct response to Republican swipes; since then, he's unleashed 11* nine--by my count, at least--unprompted anti-McCain spots (some of which are misleading, according to Factcheck.org). That's a change worth noting.

Advertisement

Broadcast information and/or factcheck.org analysis included where available:

1. "Never" (Atlanta)
"Draw[s] a connection between Republican John McCain's decision not to call Ralph Reed before a Senate panel and Reed's involvement in an Atlanta fund-raiser this week." (Atlanta Journal Constitution)

2. "Three Times"
Calls McCain's tax plan "more of the same."


3. "Punch" (Ohio)
"Spotlights John McCain's role in helping pave the way for foreign-owned DHL to take over an American shipping company and put more than 8,200 jobs at risk in Wilmington, Ohio." (Obama campaign)

Factcheck.org: "Ads from the AFL-CIO and the Obama campaign claim that McCain is partly to blame for the loss of more than 8,000 jobs in Ohio. They paint a false picture." 

4. "Fix the Economy" (Philadelphia; East Lansing, Mich.; Green Bay, Wis.; and at least five other major cities)
Asks "How can John McCain fix the economy when he doesn't think it's broken?"

Factcheck.org: "An Obama ad uses dated and out of context quotes to portray McCain as clueless on the economy. " 

5. "Book" (Des Moines; Tampa, Fla.; Paducah, Ky., and at least 10 other cities)
"Return[s] to the core of McCain's weakness: the economy, and Bush. The ad also constructs a narrative that, in a sense, accuses the Iraqis of bilking Americans with high oil prices." (Ben Smith)

6. "Embrace"
"Addresses the numerous ways in which the special interests in Washington have embraced John McCain and how McCain has hugged right back, employing lobbyists in top positions and giving tax breaks to oil and drug companies, instead of working to ease the burden on middle-class families." (Obama campaign)

7. "Backyard" (Nevada)
"Highlights John McCain's continued support for storing nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, despite scientific evidence that raises serious questions about its safety." (Obama campaign)

8. "Original"
Asks whether McCain is "the original maverick"--or just "more of the same"

Factcheck.org: "McCain is not proposing new tax breaks specifically targeted to the oil industry. He's proposing a general reduction in the corporate income tax rate, which Democrats figure would benefit the five largest oil and gas companies by $3.8 billion."

9. "Pocket"
Says McCain's campaign got $2 million from "Big Oil" while proposing "another $4 billion in tax breaks" for the industry.

Factcheck.org: "The truth is that McCain's campaign has received $1.33 million from individuals employed in the oil and gas industry, not $2 million. Obama himself has received nearly $400,000, according to the most authoritative figures available. We find the $2 million figure is based on a mistaken calculation."

*UPDATE,  Aug. 21: Two more...

10. "Better Off"
"A remix of Obama's man-on-the-street ad, which features Midwesterners challenging cheery McCain words on the economy, directs viewers to a new website: JohnMcCainRecord.com, which features a YouTube video of McCain talking about the economy at greater length, and stumblingly, during a debate as Mitt Romney looks a bit pained, and finally concluding that the country is 'better off,' though things are tough." (Ben Smith)

11. "Dangerous" (Nevada)
"Another localized negative spot, and Obama's second in Nevada, this one featuring ordinary Nevadans talking about the nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain, which Obama opposes and McCain favors." (Ben Smith)



 


 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Ezana (August 24, 2008 at 12:15 PM)

21 from furthest left makes him not the most liberal, and thank god he his not on the right. We've seen what the extreme right has accomplished with their big oil deregulation and tax breaks, union busting, unprovoked wars (justified using deception), unregulated "drunk" wall street. These people still believe trickle down economics is a reality. How does it feel to argue for McCain with no ammunition. Only sideways attacks based on speculation. Let me get this straight your using a blog site whose thesis is that there is a global labor conspiracy (unions are taking over the world?!?! you really believe that?), to prove your non-point about Ayers?!? I'm you can at least use words like "ignorance" as weapons because you don't have much else. Can you tell me how his proposed policies are better than Obama's? You can't because they aren't. Your campaigning for a guy who wants to bet our social security on wall street, and continue spending. If you are using that blog to inform you you are MISinformed, plain and simple. Rezko is a non-issue  just like the McCain mob ties it's BS. As for china, take some time to look up who is paying for our war in Iraq. What percentage of our national debt is held by the Chinese? (i'll just tell you becuase I know you won't make it that far it's 20% of 2.78 trillion and being the academic that you are, I bet you can figure out that's alot). That means we don't have alot of leverage to say anything or do anything about there policies that include imprisonment without charges (like us in gitmo), business w/o labor standards (the reason our companies export jobs and there are so many anti-union iniatives on ballots this year), aid to genocidal dictators (like McCains friends in Myanmar), etc.   I've been reading too many newspapers smart guy.


Posted By: nofreelunch (August 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM)

@Ezana

L---------------------O-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Conservative

Above is 100 dots each representing a senator.  Obama is th 21st dot from the left.  Even by your criteria Obama is nowhere near the center.

Your fact about Ayers is not a fact at all, but ignorance on your part.

Obama Timeline  http://globallabor.blogspot.com/2008/04/who-sent-obama.html

1975-1979 Attended Highschool - Hawaii  Mentored by  Frank Marshall Davis, an avowed communist

1979-1981 Attended Occidental College-Calif.  

1981-1983 attended Columbia Univ.-NYC Graduated 1983  

1983-1985 Worked in NYC part of time for Group founded by Ralph Nader  

1985-1988 Director of DCP- Group sponsored 1st by Woods Fund + Met William Ayers  

1988 Entered Harvard Law School  

1989 Summer interned at Chicago Law firm(Sidley & Austin) where Michelle, his future wife, and Bernedine Dohrn worked.  Firm had close ties to Tom Ayers, William's Father  

1990 President Harvard Law Review  

1991 Graduated Harvard Law  

1992 Directed Illinois Project Vote & co founded PUBLIC ALLIES  

1993-1996 Worked as assoc. atty Davis, Miner (Worked summers 1996-2002) Judson Miner an associate of Tom Ayers  

1993-2002 Board of Directors -Woods Fund (William Ayers also) Woods Fund made $40,000 grant to Arab American Action Network(AAAN) headed by Rashid Khalid in 2001, $35,000 in 2002  

1994-2002 Board of Directors -The Joyce Foundation (anti gun grants)+William Ayers (wrote two grants)  

1995-2002 Board of Directors -The Chicago Annenberg Challenge+ William Ayers  

1996-2004 Illinois State Senate  

2004-2008  US senate  

Ayers and Obama have been interwined since 1988.  Some think Ayers is Obama's chief mentor and power behind the curtain.

Obama knows Rezko so what?

Obama could not have bought the house he is living in without Rezko's help. Rezko raised $250,000 for Obama's early senate runs.  Obama and Rezko were interlocked for 20 years until Rezko was indicted.

I'm neither a paid shill or a fascist. I'm an informed voter who sees Obama for what he is based on his history.  

Lastly, your prediction and rant about the Mandarins and the corporate dictatorship, leads me to believe that you've been reading too many Robert Ludlum books. Try reading a history book now and then.  Have a nice day.


Posted By: Ezana (August 21, 2008 at 8:46 PM)

Fact: the study that says he is the most liberal is flawed and only uses one set of criteria here is a better one. In reality even Biden is more liberal (so is Dodd).  Obama is closer to the 21st most liberal andhttp://voteview.com/sen109.htm

Fact: Obama went to a private school served on one neighborhood committee with Ayers and hardly knows him.

Fact: you know nothing about the Global poverty act. How much of that price tag is taken up by private charities?

Fact: Obama knows Rezko so what?

Fact: Obama is a middle of the road candidate and you're either a paid shill working for corporate funded right wing think tank trying to dupe Americans into voting against their interests or a fascist.

My prediction if McCain wins you'll witness Americas definitive slide into the toilet. He'll finish what George started. The Mandarins will reign over a corporate dictatorship a lot like China's maybe the Republican's already sold us to them. How much of the Iraq war is on Chinese credit?


 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu