Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Thursday, August 21, 2008 5:31 PM

On the Eve of the Convention, an Opening for Obama in Colorado?

Brian No

A Guest Post by Brian No  


John McCain's recent comments to a Colorado newspaper that a 1922 seven-state agreement governing the use of the Colorado River "obviously needs to be renegotiated over time" may sound completely innocuous, perhaps even sensible, to most people.

Advertisement

But to Colorado voters, McCain might as well have said he likes to eat cute puppies for breakfast. It's hard to explain to a non-Coloradan the outsized significance of the Colorado River--and its coveted snowmelt water--within the state. "Over my dead body," Sen. Ken Salazar (D-CO) said in a statement. To which Republican senate candidate Bob Schaffer added, "Over my cold, dead, political carcass." Get the point?

In this arid region of the country, rural farmers depend on the river's water, and after enduring the worst drought since the 18th century in recent years, any notion that Scottsdale golfers and Bellagio gamblers need more water than they're currently allotted is basically Rule #1 under What Not to Say in Colorado. Just as Yucca Mountain is a nuclear issue in Nevada-pun intended-Coloradans often quote Mark Twain, who's rumored to have said, "Whiskey is for drinking; water is for fighting over." Many local pundits in Colorado are already asking whether "McCain just lo[st] Colorado."

For decades, Colorado has been a reliable red state in presidential elections, but this year the Centennial State is shaping up to be a true battleground--possibly playing a decisive role in the Electoral College math. The DNC's decision to host its convention here was no accident. Recent polls have the race neck-and-neck, with the latest averages from Real Clear Politics showing McCain and Obama tied at about 45 percent. If Obama is able to add Iowa and New Mexico to John Kerry's 2004 map, then pick off Colorado's nine electoral votes, he'll win the election.

At first glance, Colorado is a state where McCain should be easily ahead. Since 1964, it's gone blue just once--when Ross Perot garnered 24 percent of the votes and boosted Bill Clinton to victory in 1992. Furthermore, registered Republicans outnumber Democrats, with Colorado Springs--home to James Dobson's Focus on the Family--emerging as a major evangelical base. And remember Tom Tancredo? He's represents a Denver suburb. The fact that McCain is a familiar face from a neighboring state should also earn him some support.

That said, Colorado has experienced a Democratic renaissance in recent years. In 2004, there was only one Democrat who held a statewide office. Today, Democrats control the legislature, the governor's mansion, four of seven House districts and one of two Senate seats, with Democratic Rep. Mark Udall favored to win the other this November. Just like the rest of the country, the economy, energy prices and the Iraq War have emerged as top concerns, helping to fuel Colorado's "purple-ization." But there are other, more permanent trends at play as well. The burgeoning Latino population and an influx of young high-tech professionals from places like California and Texas have made Colorado a more hospitable climate for Democrats in recent decades. And historically, Mountain West voters have been known for their libertarian streak, often eschewing party loyalty. Simply put, people in the Mountain West want to be left alone. It's no surprise that independents make up the second biggest voting group in Colorado.

Whether Obama can win Colorado is up in the air. Despite the changing demographics and the unpopularity of the current administration, it's still a right-of-center state in a conservative region of the country. But Colorado voters have been kind to the pragmatic, unpretentious, authentic politician-regardless of party affiliation.

McCain was seemingly speaking as an Arizonan when he made his recent water gaffe, but his suggestion that Coloradans give up more of its scarcest resource could very well cost him votes this November. Obama, despite his advantages in cash and national mood, is fighting against history in trying to win Colorado. If he wants to take the state, he'll need all the help he can get. In other words, Obama would be foolish not to exploit what was a shocking heresy on McCain's part--at least to the ears of Coloradans.

Previous Colorado coverage:
Can Obama Win Out West?
A Plan to Swing Colorado
 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: mvymvy (August 22, 2008 at 1:59 PM)

To make every vote in every state politically relevant and equal in presidential elections, support the National Popular Vote bill.

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

The National Popular Vote bill has been approved by 21 legislative chambers (one house in CO, AR, ME, NC, and WA, and two houses in MD, IL, HI, CA, MA, NJ, RI, and VT). It has been enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring this legislation into effect.

see  http://www.NationalPopularVote.com

susan