Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:05 PM

Hypocrisy Alert! Team McCain Plays the Gender Card--Despite Palin's Objections

Andrew Romano

MARCH 2008


Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to NEWSWEEK's Karen Breslau: "I do think it's a more concentrated criticism that Hillary gets on so many fronts ... But fair or unfair, I think she does herself a disservice to even mention it, really. You have to plow through that. You have to know what you're getting into ... When I hear a statement ... coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about that excess criticism or a sharper microscope being put on her, I think that doesn't do us any good, women in politics, women in general wanting to progress this country ... Work harder, prove yourself to an even greater degree ... It bothers me a little bit hearing her bring that attention to herself."

Advertisement

SEPT. 2, 2008 

RNC Victory Chair and Senior McCain Adviser Carly Fiorina: “I am appalled by the Obama campaign’s attempts to belittle Gov. Sarah Palin’s experience. The facts are that Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a mayor and governor than Barack Obama has made in his life. Because of Hillary Clinton’s historic run for the presidency and the treatment she received, American women are more highly tuned than ever to recognize and decry sexism in all its forms. They will not tolerate sexist treatment of Governor Palin.”

The McCain campaign also e-mailed reporters a Wall Street Journal op-ed titled "Ignore the Chauvinists. Palin Has Real Experience" earlier this afternoon. Next time, maybe they should consult with their vice presidential candidate before throwing around big words like "sexist."

UPDATE, Sept. 3: 

McCain National Co-Chair and Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman: "I actually think it's completely fair for the media to vet Sarah Palin, just as they did for John McCain and Barack Obama and everyone else who's running for office. You're running for the second highest office in the land, so it's the right thing to do... I wouldn't say there really has [been any sexism]."

Somebody's off-message!
 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: griffin1 (September 3, 2008 at 11:54 PM)

am ashamed at watching and listening to such a desperate party, This Country need a change and not more of the same. Through this entire speech was bashing, no substance, no direct plan of helping get this nation back on track, McCain is so confused he uses this woman to talk about change and reform but he still have the same policies as Bush, this is an embarrassment


Posted By: Lee Holmes (September 3, 2008 at 11:10 PM)

What Metz doesnt bother to mention of course,is that the tax structure on ''the rich''under Clinton was at just under 36% of total marginal taxes. Now,it is 35.5% .So much for those great tax breaks for ''the rich''eh? Clinton was giving these guys as much of a break as was Bush. Indeed,the ''rich''are paying the highest ''fair share''in American history in this era. And fewer people in the lower end are paying taxes than they were in 1994.  But why confuse the ideologues with the facts? Go here instead.

The Internal Revenue Service www.irs.gov Tax Graphs.


Posted By: metzlerd (September 3, 2008 at 8:30 PM)

Yeah right!  Working people will have such a hard time with rich people having to pay their fair share that they will probably just vote Republican just so we can give the wealthy a break on their taxes!

That argument was tried already and failed.  Giving wealthy people a break on their taxes just inflates their bank accounts.  Giving the middle class a break on their taxes, puts money into the economy for work done.  It is the middle class that boosts the economy.

I'll take Obama's tax plan over the Republicans any day.  McCain's tax breaks are not for "WE the working people".  When McCain says "WE" or "US", he means the people who have more than $5 million in income; not the middle class.  He's talking about the country club elite.