Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:45 PM

Palin: Now Afraid to Be in the Same ROOM as a Reporter?

Andrew Romano
(AP Photo / Henny Ray Abrams)

Remember what I wrote last week about the McCain campaign pulling back the curtain and finally allowing the press and the public to interact, however fleetingly, with its long-sequestered vice-presidential nominee?

Um, nevermind. 

Knowing that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is currently visiting Manhattan, Father of Stumper asked this morning whether I'd be "hanging out" with the Mooseburger Queen of Wasilla. As we speak, she's over at the United Nations General Assembly shindig meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in an attempt to establish international insta-cred. I told him no. The sessions are closed to the public, I said, and I'm not planning on joining her press pool.

Advertisement

Turns out it wouldn't have mattered if I did. Originally, the McCain campaign indicated that two editorial journalists--Elizabeth Holmes of the Wall Street Journal and CNN embed Peter Hamby--would be allowed to attend the so-called “pool sprays” before Palin’s conclaves, which are basically "glorified photo opportunities during which journalists can snap photos and film footage and–if they’re lucky–shout a question or two at Palin and her company before she adjourns for private meetings," as Ken Vogel writes over at Politico. But an hour before the events, the McCain campaign decided to bar both Holmes and Hamby, claiming that the sprays were appropriate only for photographers and videographers because "there were not going to be questions or statements." That's one way to put it. The other? That the campaign would benefit from free pictures of Palin huddling with world leaders without exposing her to the possibility of having to hear--not even answer, but hear--a question from a real journalist.

Ultimately, Team McCain allowed CNN to cover the spray for all of 29 seconds--but only after the cable channel refused to send its cameras. Without CNN in the room, none of the networks would've received video footage, so the McCain campaign had to relent. Otherwise, it would've faced a total TV blackout. As for Holmes, she was out of luck--as was the print pool relying on her report.

I get that Team McCain wants to "protect" Palin from the press. But this is getting ridiculous. Last week, I interpreted Palin's off-the-cuff decision as she was entering a Cleveland diner to respond to a CBS reporter's request for comment on the AIG bailout--her first answer to an impromptu question from the national press since joining the ticket last month--as a sign that McCain's running mate might be opening up. Instead, it seems to have marked the start of a new effort to stifle ALL editorial coverage of the candidate. As the CBS embed reports today, a Palin staffer told him that questions “weren’t allowed” after he had the temerity to approach Palin in Cleveland, and the campaign chose not to notify the pool reporter assigned to be in Palin's motorcade when the candidate departed Sunday for a scheduled stop at an Orlando ice-cream parlor--meaning that "there was no editorial presence at the event."

It's one thing to refuse interview requests, ignore questions, choose rallies over town halls and not even entertain the possibility of press conferences. That's how Palin has managed to interact with only one nonpartisan journalist and one group of voters in her four weeks as a potential vice president. (In contrast, Joe Biden has done more than 80 interviews with local and national media since the Democrats held their national convention late last month.) But it's another thing altogether to systematically avoid situations where a question might even be posed, which is what the McCain camp is doing now. The former is a strategy--an undemocratic strategy, but a strategy all the same--designed to limit the risk of gaffes. The latter is pure, irrational fear.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The media-bashing masses may squeal with vindictive delight. Still, it's worth noting that the political press corps--as despised as it might be, often fairly--is actually important here. Thanks to Palin's relatively skimpy resume, the greatest test of her readiness for office--as it was for the comparably green Obama--will be how well she performs in the campaign pressure-cooker. There's no better measure of her character and convictions than dueling with press and the public on a regular basis. Palin's rise has been remarkable. But until she answers some tough, fair questions, we won't know whether it's prepared her for high office.

So here's hoping we find out before Nov. 4 whether Crystal City's fear is justified. After that it'll be too late.

UPDATE. 4:50 p.m.: Via Jonathan Martin: "Campaign aides, calculating the cost/benefit analysis of such extreme measures, have now decided to allow print reporters into Palin's subsequent meetings this afternoon." He also has Hamby's pool report on Karzai and Holmes' dispatch on Kissinger, if you're interested. As you can see--no questions--the McCain camp was being pretty paranoid. I mean, I know reporters are somewhat disheveled-looking, but really...

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Krohn (October 1, 2008 at 8:55 PM)

A man of great wisdom:

http://www.atlah.org/broadcast/manningreport.html


Posted By: Nins (October 1, 2008 at 2:13 AM)

Sarah Palin is a fraud. She was pregnant before she got married, has had an affair with one of her husband's friends, her 19 year old son is rumored to have serious drug problems, her 17 year old unwed daughter is pregnant, and she has used her political power to get even with people who disagree with her, yet all she talks about is being a "good Christian" and doing God's will.  As a Christian she is a hypocrite who can not walk her talk, and as a politician she is completely unqualified to be Vice President.  Her interview with Katie Couric showed her to be a woman with a disorganzied mind, a woman who is in over her head, utterly unprepared for the twist her fate has taken.  

Even committed Republicans who support McCain have to ask themselves if they really would take the risk of putting our country into Palin's hands.  Sure, being VP doesn't necessarily take a lot of skills, but being President requires great intelligence and a clear-eyed world view, one untainted by religious fanaticism.  Look at the mess we got with the under qualified Dubya, and even he seems smarter and less fanatical than Palin.  McCain is 72 years old, with high cholesterol and high blood pressure; his father and grandfather each died of heart attacks at age 72.  McCain's Vice President HAS to be ready to lead.  And by lead, I am not referring to a full speed charge into Armageddon.  

For those of you who don't know, Palin belongs to a fundamentalist church that believes the end of the world is near: that war, financial distress and famine will kill off the sinful non-believers, and that when this holocaust occurs all good Christians will be taking refuge in Alaska.  Furthermore, her church conducts witch hunts -- they actually use prayer to locate "witches" in their community, then publicly brand them as witches, and hold them responsible for everything that goes wrong in town.  (Honestly, I think the long winters must be getting to their minds.)  You can go on YouTube and watch videos of Palin participating during sermons like this.  She stands on the altar facing the members.  The congregation stands with outstretched hands, trancelike, speaking in tounges while the priest prays to "keep Sarah safe from all forms of witchcraft."

Could you REALLY feel comfortable knowing that a woman who holds these beliefs would have the power to declare war and deploy nuclear missles?


Posted By: Thomas Klaber (September 30, 2008 at 5:55 PM)

I happened to look over my son''s shoulder while he was watching Tina Fey;s latest Sarah gag on SNL. He, for some reason felt compelled to remind me that it was only a parody. Go figure.


 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu