Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:34 PM

Florida, By the Numbers

Andrew Romano

 

If Barack Obama swipes the Sunshine State's 27 electoral votes from the Republican column, the 2008 election is over. Can he swing it? Right now, the Illinois senator (who finished a two-day visit Tuesday) is doing his bestbut John McCain (who arrives tomorrow) has signaled that he's willing to fight to the finish. Here are the latest stats on where Florida standsconveniently categorized by which candidate they benefit:

ADVANTAGE OBAMA:

  • 1 percent: Obama's lead in the RealClear Politics polling average.
  • 73,476: Obama's lead, out of 306,444 ballots cast, in early-voting results (not including absentee-ballot numbers)
  • 657,775: Amount by which Democratic registrations outnumber Republican registrations (up from less than 370,000 four years ago); Bush beat Kerry by 381,000 votes in 2004
  • 120,000: Number of black Democratic voters registered since January
  • 25: Number of Obama-Biden events since Sept. 1; McCain and Palin have held 16
  • 5: Approximate number of calls per day that Tom Slade, a former Florida GOP chair, was receiving last week from fellow Republicans demanding that he "do something" about McCain's "perilous" position in the state.
  • 3-to-1: The margin by which Obama is outspending McCain on local television
  • $39 million: The amount Obama is spending overall (more than any other state)
  • 2: The number of top field generalsSteve Hildebrand and Paul TewesObama has dispatched to the state.
  • More than 60: The number of Obama field offices
  • More than 400: The number of paid Obama staffers (up from 250 for Bush-Cheney 2004); McCain currently boasts less than 100.
  • More than 100,000: The number of active Obama volunteers.

ADVANTAGE MCCAIN

  • 1.3 percent: McCain's average lead in the three non-partisan polls released since Oct. 16, all of which show him ahead of Obama
  • 3 percent: Amount McCain has gained in the respected Mason-Dixon poll since Oct. 6
  • 6 percent: Amount McCain has gained in the Rasmussen poll over the last week alone
  • 5 percent: Bush's margin of victory in 2004
  • 220,000: Amount by which Republicans lead in absentee ballot requests
  • 55,000: Number of votes by which McCain leads in early voting (including absentee ballots requested, but not returned)


Ultimately, Florida will boil down to a pretty simple question: Can Obama's massive, unprecedented investments in advertising, registration and getting out the vote expand the electorate enough to overcome the GOP's traditional edges in infrastructure and mobilization? Right now, it looks like a jump ballperhaps with a little bit of momentum on McCain's side. But given the intangibles of turnout, we won't know who's won until Nov. 4.

UPDATE, Oct. 23: A new St. Petersburg Times/Bay News 9/Miami Herald poll shows Barack Obama leading McCain 49 percent to 42 percent in the Sunshine State. Adam Smith reports:

The biggest factor? Less partisan independent voters moving to Obama by a margin of more than 2 to 1... At a time when economic anxiety trumps all issues in Florida, about half of the voters surveyed — and almost 6 in 10 independents — said Obama has a better plan to improve the economy, while one in three voters say McCain does. Forty-five percent said Obama has shown the most leadership on the economy, and 34 percent said McCain.

This should increase Obama's average RCP lead to two percent.


Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Omaar (October 23, 2008 at 8:49 AM)

America is a Dongerous place now....

The 8 Years George W. Bush  has been in Power, proves that.

The Economy Tanked out and the  2 wars  we are participating in are in fact  ...

Fiananced By  still Very [Communist-Socialist China]  to the sound of a Trillion Dollars !!!

I Guess Bush  and his Administration are all Communist  ?

A Self Sufficient  so called [Democratic Government], does not Borrow Money from any [Communist-Socialist Countries]  when they have Great Briton and the European Union as it's Allies to Borrow Money from, Opposed to a Communist-Socialist Country like  [Red China]

Some of You Hateful people  should Complain about that...Bu you won't.

I guesss we pick an Choose who we want to lable  [Socialist-Communist]

Throw Nixon, Prescott Bush, George H.W. Bush Sr, Jimmy Carter, Ronald W. Reagan, Bill Clinton &  george W. Bush Jr. in  the League of [Communist-Socialist] as well  

Just say "I don't want a Black  President and black  1st lady"

Because all this other  Borderline Bull-Spit is not  going over well...At All

Admit it !!

Obama's going to WIN in spite of it.


Posted By: Omaar (October 23, 2008 at 8:40 AM)

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080915/scheer

Sarah Palin believes in [Redistribution Of Wealth] as noted in her Alaskan Windfall Profit Tax, to the Families of Alaska...

Palin is Fraud, Hypocrite and Contradiction, to those that Blindly Follow her rhetoric without Researching this Alaskan Witch !!

Note: Welcome to the People's Republic of Alaska, where every resident this year will get a $3,200 payout, thanks in no small measure to the efforts of Sarah Palin, the state's Republican governor. That's $22,400 for a family of seven, like Palin's. Since 1982, the Alaska Permanent Fund, which invests oil revenues from state lands, has paid out a dividend on invested oil loot to everyone who has been in the state for a year.

But Palin upped the ante by joining with Democrats and some recalcitrant Republican state legislators to share in oil company windfall profits, further fattening state tax revenue and permitting an additional payout in tax funds to residents.

Big Note: No wonder she is popular with voters in a state whose residents pay no income or sales taxes but are blessed with state coffers rolling in cash at a time when all other states are suffering. Indeed, when the oil companies pay more taxes to the state of Alaska, they get to write that off against their federal tax obligation, leaving the rest of us to make up the shortfall.

The state of Alaska owns most of the oil-producing land and was getting upward of 85 percent of its budget from the oil companies that lease the fields, even before Palin helped increase the state's cut. While other states fire schoolteachers because of the economic downturn, Alaska has, as Palin indicated in accepting John McCain's offer to join him on the GOP ticket, more money than it knows what to do with. In a display of plucky arrogance at her coming-out press conference, Palin boasted deceptively that if Alaskans wanted that infamous bridge to nowhere, "we'd build it ourselves."

She originally had supported having US taxpayers finance that boondoggle, before McCain and others in Congress blasted it.

Not that I blame Palin for wrangling for her state a bigger cut of oil company windfall profits; it's just not an option that will work wonders for states without oil. Of course we can remedy that by having a federal windfall profits tax of the sort that Barack Obama dared propose, and which McCain and his fellow congressional Republicans have managed to quash. Their argument, rejected quite pointedly by Palin for Alaska, is that it would discourage oil companies from investing in boosting oil field yields.

In 2000 Mccain was Socialist also...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2JPbQOHEkY


Posted By: Omaar (October 23, 2008 at 8:39 AM)

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080915/scheer

Sarah Palin believes in [Redistribution Of Wealth] as noted in her Alaskan Windfall Profit Tax, to the Families of Alaska...

Palin is Fraud, Hypocrite and Contradiction, to those that Blindly Follow her rhetoric without Researching this Alaskan Witch !!

Note: Welcome to the People's Republic of Alaska, where every resident this year will get a $3,200 payout, thanks in no small measure to the efforts of Sarah Palin, the state's Republican governor. That's $22,400 for a family of seven, like Palin's. Since 1982, the Alaska Permanent Fund, which invests oil revenues from state lands, has paid out a dividend on invested oil loot to everyone who has been in the state for a year.

But Palin upped the ante by joining with Democrats and some recalcitrant Republican state legislators to share in oil company windfall profits, further fattening state tax revenue and permitting an additional payout in tax funds to residents.

Big Note: No wonder she is popular with voters in a state whose residents pay no income or sales taxes but are blessed with state coffers rolling in cash at a time when all other states are suffering. Indeed, when the oil companies pay more taxes to the state of Alaska, they get to write that off against their federal tax obligation, leaving the rest of us to make up the shortfall.

The state of Alaska owns most of the oil-producing land and was getting upward of 85 percent of its budget from the oil companies that lease the fields, even before Palin helped increase the state's cut. While other states fire schoolteachers because of the economic downturn, Alaska has, as Palin indicated in accepting John McCain's offer to join him on the GOP ticket, more money than it knows what to do with. In a display of plucky arrogance at her coming-out press conference, Palin boasted deceptively that if Alaskans wanted that infamous bridge to nowhere, "we'd build it ourselves."

She originally had supported having US taxpayers finance that boondoggle, before McCain and others in Congress blasted it.

Not that I blame Palin for wrangling for her state a bigger cut of oil company windfall profits; it's just not an option that will work wonders for states without oil. Of course we can remedy that by having a federal windfall profits tax of the sort that Barack Obama dared propose, and which McCain and his fellow congressional Republicans have managed to quash. Their argument, rejected quite pointedly by Palin for Alaska, is that it would discourage oil companies from investing in boosting oil field yields.

In 2000 Mccain was Socialist also...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2JPbQOHEkY