Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:45 AM

Is Starbucks Election Offer Legal?

Katie Paul


Remember that nice, civic-minded advertisement that debuted during "Saturday Night Live" and shot to viral fame on YouTube? The one where you get free coffee for telling your chipper barista that you just voted? Well, the offer may not be exactly legal.

Election laws prevent individuals and organizations from offering monetary incentives to get people to the polls, keeping partisan hacks from bribing potential voters likely to swing their way. Unfortunately for national chains like Starbucks, Krispy Kreme, Ben & Jerry's and sex-toys emporium Babeland, the definition of "monetary incentive" also includes offers of free stuff like coffee, donuts, ice cream, and, um, a certain sleeve-like contraption called "The Maverick."

Would anyone actually pursue legal action against such altruistic institutions? Probably not. According to D.C.-based election law expert Kenneth Gross, the offers were neither partisan nor overly generous nor particularly concerned with verifying that customers actually cast votes, all of which makes the undertaking pretty benign in the legal scheme of things. "With or without a tall cup of coffee, I doubt any prosecutor will lose any sleep over this," he said.

Still, just to be on the safe side, the companies have backtracked; free stuff will now be on offer for everyone, whether or not they cast their ballots. Starbucks didn't return NEWSWEEK's phone call on Monday, but the message came through loud and clear via Twitter late last night: Oops.

"IMPORTANT: To ensure that we are in compliance with election law, we are extending our offer to all customers who request a tall brewed drip."

Ain't democracy grand? Perhaps, although Gross has a more sobering take on the situation. "If everyone takes these companies up on their giveaways, I hope the next president has a heck of a health plan to offer the American people."

Seen other fun stuff on offer for election day? Let us know and we'll give you a shoutout  on our new reader feedback blog, Readback


Update: Starbucks did get back to us with their new statement after catching this post:  "We’ve been excited by the number of positive responses received about our free coffee offer. To ensure we are in compliance with election law, we are extending our offer to all customers who request a tall brewed coffee. We’re pleased to honor our commitment to communities on this important Election Day. We hope there is a record turnout on Tuesday and look forward to celebrating with our customers over a great cup of coffee."

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: birdmanbob4 (November 6, 2008 at 1:28 PM)

birdmanbob4@yahoo.com The law states it is a federal offense to offer or except any compensation to register to vote to vote in a primary or to vote in a general election. period thats the law. We are a nation of laws if you want to change the law fine do so. but the reason for the law is simple we were all taught is in civics class. our founders wanted no influence zero on our voting proses. Starbucks Krispy Kream and Ben and Jerry’s are all left leaning company’s their reasons for doing this are calculated. if you have

birdmanbob4@yahoo.com The law states it is a federal offense to offer or except any compensation to register to vote to vote in a primary or to vote in a general election. period thats the law. We are a nation of laws if you want to change the law fine do so. but the reason for the law is simple we were all taught is in civics class. our founders wanted no influence zero on our voting proses. Starbucks Krispy Kream and Ben and Jerry’s are all left leaning company’s their reasons for doing this are calculated. if you have half a brain you can figure out why. please contact me if you want the company’s who broke the law to pay “class action” they can not be allowed to mess with this law in any way. their is no difference between what they did and what ACORN has done giving out a free sig. or beer money for a regrestration.a brain you can figure out why. please contact me if you want the company’s who broke the law to pay “class action” they can not be allowed to mess with this law in any way. their is no difference between what they did and what ACORN has done giving out a free sig. or beer money for a regrestration.


Posted By: goinglikesixty (November 4, 2008 at 4:21 PM)

Texas county commissioner bought 1000 plungers to show support for Joe the Plumber. He said he was going to give them to poll workers and voters to take into polling places.

Seems that nobody informed him that Joe the Plumber wasn't on the ballot.

http://tinyurl.com/5mrhp3


Posted By: almond89 (November 4, 2008 at 1:47 PM)

How dare we – as Americans – make a mockery of the election process by allowing ourselves to be bribed by Starbucks and others to practice that privilege?

This election has been marked by questionable ethics and integrity from the beginning, but at the end of the day there was always some integrity in the electoral process as a whole. That feeling is now gone. Are we – as Americans – telling the rest of the world that our vote means nothing more than a cup of coffee?  An idea I believe would make our founding fathers turn in their graves.

Voting is a privilege, one that can be taken away at any time. We need to cherish every chance we get to execute that privilege for the honor it brings, not because someone offered us free coffee.

What happens when we are no longer tempted with our little reward? Or worse, what happens when the rewards become larger and more partisan? In an election haled as, “the most important of our time” I think we should hope for more integrity and less bribery. The world is in the balance so “if we all care enough to vote” lets we do so for the right reasons.