In
this week's NEWSWEEK, Stumper goes analog to look at the generational
tension at the heart of the Democratic race. A sneak preview:
Ah, the folly of youth. On Sept. 24, 2007, I pitched a story to my boss at NEWSWEEK about "Barack Obama
and young voters—specifically, whether they can actually help him win
the nomination or whether they'll just stay home, you know, watching
MTV and eating Doritos as they have in the past." With Obama trailing Hillary Clinton by 10 points in Iowa,
his campaign manager, David Plouffe, had just told reporters that
youngsters were "Barack's core support—in effect, his hidden vote." I'm
25; my editor is 31. "I like this a lot," he replied. "Proceed, my
friend."
A week later, after interviewing campaign
staffers and independent observers, I sent him a profile of Obama's
nimble Iowa youth program. Haunted by the specter of Howard Dean, whose
hordes of orange-hatted out-of-state volunteers failed to fulfill the
Vermonter's youthful potential in 2004, Team Obama had already hired
four times as many staffers and invested five times as much money in
the state, opening an unprecedented 31 offices and launching a novel
"BarackStars" program to target the 40,000 untapped 17-year-olds set to
turn 18 before Election Day. Rob Sand, a 25-year-old former Deaniac,
admitted that he'd skipped the 2004 caucuses. But this time was
different. "I'm more excited about Obama than I was about Dean," he
said. "Dean was polarizing. Obama brings people together." Although
counting on kids to carry the caucuses was "a tall order," I wrote,
"the potential, at least, is there."
My boss liked
the story—but his boss, a 43-year-old former Washington bureau chief,
was skeptical. He'd heard the spiel before. Gene McCarthy. Gary Hart.
Bill Bradley. Dean. "If young voters show up and Obama wins Iowa," he
said, smiling as he slumped on an office sofa, "it's a big steak dinner
for you guys. And I'm buying." My editor nixed "The Audacity of Youth"
that night.
Exactly
three months later, I arrived at the apartment of Paul Tewes, Obama's
Iowa state director, as the icy streets of downtown Des Moines filled
with young Obamaniacs hugging and cheering, "We did it!" Upstairs,
scruffy postcollegiate staffers squeezed between couches and credenzas
to celebrate the senator's surprise victory. Cans of Bud Light covered
every surface. Youth turnout was up 135 percent from 2004, and the
under-25 set alone gave Obama 17,000 votes, a 26-year-old speechwriter
told me. Obama's margin of victory? Twenty thousand. "We did it" was
right.
Rob Sand e-mailed the next morning. "This," he wrote, "is our next president."
Born
in the 1980s, Sand and the supporters chugging Bud that night are what
generational theorists call "millennials." (Full disclosure: I'm one,
too. Further disclosure: I'm also a registered independent.) Now, a
month after Iowa, my boss's boss is well aware that millions of my
peers have fallen under the spell of the freshman senator from
Illinois. At this point, the statistics seem almost stale: with youth
turnout doubling, tripling and even quadrupling in the 30 contests to
date, Obama won the 18-to-29 demographic by 4-1 in Iowa, 3-1 in New Hampshire,
3-1 in South Carolina and 2-1 in Nevada, and he trounced Clinton, often
by as much as 50 percent among young voters, in 10 of the 13 Super
Tuesday states with available data.
Read the rest of the story here.
Slideshow: Stumper on the Road