<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.newsweek.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BRESLAU: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx</link><description>[youtube:dGeQ6dxGMFA] By Karen Breslau It is often a measure of Hillary Clinton's discomfort when she smiles broadly and lets loose with her deep, often-mocked belly laugh. So it was at a press conference at the Pittsburgh airport this afternoon, when</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)</generator><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301087</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301087</guid><dc:creator>drsyko1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What a stupid, stupid article. &amp;nbsp;The Hillary bashing of Newsweek is really hitting a ludicrous high. &amp;nbsp;You have got to be kidding me with this. &amp;nbsp;Did you ask Obama what Michelle's views are about his flip-flop on Nafta, his flip-flop on bringing the troops home, his flip-flop on whether or not he heard the sermons, or his flip-flop on almost everything else he ever said?? &amp;nbsp;Since when do spouses have to agree and how does disagreement constitute a conflice of interest?? &amp;nbsp;And I'd really like to know what happened to article that was here for about 5 seconds yesterday about how Obama is now backing out of his pledge to only use federal money for his campaign. &amp;nbsp;Oh, I forgot, musn't say anything negative about Obama here . . . Does everyone in your family agree with what you say? &amp;nbsp;If you have a partner, and he/she disagrees with what you write, should you not use any of their money because it would be a conflict of interest? &amp;nbsp;The whole notion of this is too stupid for words. &amp;nbsp;Of course Hillary was laughing, what else should she do--take these moronic &amp;nbsp;questions seriously? &amp;nbsp;She's not stupid--she knows that no matter what she says or does you will write nothing but negative crap about her, as is demonstrated so clearly here. You people really have no shame or decency any more. &amp;nbsp;Your shilling for Obama and your totally irresponsible &amp;nbsp;and continuous bashing of Hillary represents yellow journalism at its worst. &amp;nbsp;Congratulations on reaching a new low and destroying your credibility even more. &amp;nbsp;I do hope that Newsweek is going to feel that the complete and total destruction of it's credibility and any respect it held in the world is worth it. &amp;nbsp;I can't imagine that it will be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301112</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:53:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301112</guid><dc:creator>ZenNonna</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Loved this post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hillary thinks her lie about Bosnia is funny. It was her entry line on a late night talk show. She thinks the 800k Bill took is no big deal My personal favorite was her interview on NPR when she brought up a double standard and then says &amp;quot;why I am I the one being asked about this&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually I think there is something very wrong with her. I am so ashamed that I was a supporter earlier in the year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basically I am just getting sick of her &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301199</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:11:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301199</guid><dc:creator>drsyko1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you want to talk about spousal conflict of interest, how about writing about Obama's political favors that resulted in money going to the hospital that Michelle works for, which resulted in a massive raise (around 100%) for Michelle? &amp;nbsp;Hmmm . . . this seems a lot more like news than whether or not Bill and Hillary agree on Columbia. &amp;nbsp;And yes, Hillary's criticism of current trade agreements does apply to her husband's administration--which she has already stated NUMEROUS times in debates and elsewhere. &amp;nbsp;Where have you been?? &amp;nbsp;Oh, I forgot, you've been too busy drinking Obama's kool-aid to actually pay attention to anything else but your Obamaniac high. &amp;nbsp;Or how about writing about Obama's LYING about whether or not he pledged to come to an agreement with the Republican candidate to only accept public financing for his campaign? &amp;nbsp;Could you at least PRETEND to have some journalistic integrity by writing about something that might actually be, oh wait for it, NEWSWORTHY???&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301241</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:18:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301241</guid><dc:creator>Lee Holmes</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hoo boy. Newsweek as parrot-cage liner. What I find odd in this piece is the rank partisanship it exudes. Not due to any ''pro-Obama''or 'anti-Hillary''stance by any means,though this is permeating the pages of this once decent forum of news and events like a noxious cloud,but the anti-free trade nonense that lay within. Note to NEWSWEEK lefties: Angering Colombia is not going to get us anywhere either. They will merely give us,[and American union-paying jobs],the boot,and cut new deals with China,and go on killing labour organizers[the writer of the above piece probably thinks that FARC is a new kind of kids cereal],so there is no use laying all the blame on Uribe. Then too,''mending fences with our allies''is not perfomed by angering these just to grab votes and dough from your unionist satraps in the AFL-CIO,who have had reigns as corrupt as any banana-republic dictator. The real stupidity as realized by the anti-freetraders is that somehow isolating nations will get them to change their ways. Not on a bet. They will simply form new,lasting coalitions with less savory nations in the area of ''human rights''.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301315</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:36:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301315</guid><dc:creator>LDS2484</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;She's being publicly embarassed and feeling akward and exposed. &amp;nbsp;She's stating that she opposes NAFTA now because it's convenient for her to do so, and she's counting on records to be suppressed or journalists not to do any digging into what she actually said. &amp;nbsp;She's laughing louder to cover up the calls for her to stop lying and bow out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301487</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:25:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301487</guid><dc:creator>Pupster</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since she has a joint account with Bill, she is personally profiting from her husband's free trade lobbying while she pays lip service on the stump of being against it. She wants to boycott the Olympic opening ceremony while Mark Penn, who is still in her campaign, and his lobbying firm works for the Beijing Olympics to promote it. Example after example of her claiming to be on one side of an issue while a close advisor or her own husband is on the other. How can we believe a word she says? She can't be trusted.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301526</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:33:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301526</guid><dc:creator>timrogers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hillary is against but Bill is for. The money Bill gets &amp;nbsp;promoting free trade finds its way back to Hillary so she can run commercials against free trade. The Clinton circus always has three rings under the big top. What they say out of one side of their mouth goes around the rings and comes out different on the other side of their mouth. Does anyone in the audience notice? In one ring the campaign manager, Mr. Penn, takes the Columbian money to fight the free trade agreement. Then he is shot out of a cannon to another ring where he gives &amp;nbsp;Hillary money to campaign against free trade. She remains in the center ring and introduces the clowns . By the way that there are always legitimate differences of opinion in politics. The clowns are followed by the high wire act. Pay special attention union members you will not believe your eyes. The acrobats can flip from for free trade to against free trade and back to for free trade for in the blink of an eye. Hillary juggles the acts because she knows the show will go on, anyone need any extra tickets? &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#301973</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:53:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:301973</guid><dc:creator>jonstorm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you hated Bill linton, you must love President Bush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you hate Hllary so much you are going to just love President McCain. &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302094</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:42:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302094</guid><dc:creator>herfan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that Obama with no experience saving the environment is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) left office with the greatest amount of environmental cleanup, and protections in American history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that Obama with little or no education experience is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) made higher education affordable for every American. And created higher job demand and starting salary’s than they had ever been before or since.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that Obama with no experience will be better than Hillary Clinton who spent 8 years at the right hand of &amp;nbsp;President Bill Clinton. Who is already on record as one of the greatest Presidents in American history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think that you can change the way Washington works with pretty speeches from Obama, rather than with the experience, and political expertise of two master politicians ON YOUR SIDE like Hillary and Bill Clinton..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jacksmith...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p.s. You Might Be An Idiot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you don't know that the huge amounts of money funding the Obama campaign to try and defeat Hillary Clinton is coming in from the insurance, and medical industry, that has been ripping you off, and killing you and your children. And denying you, and your loved ones the life saving medical care you needed. All just so they can make more huge immoral profits for them-selves off of your suffering...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You see, back in 1993 Hillary Clinton had the audacity, and nerve to try and get quality, affordable universal health care for everyone to prevent the suffering and needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of you each year. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Approx. 100,000 of you die each year from medical accidents from a rush to profit by the insurance, and medical industry. Another 120,000 of you die each year from treatable illness that people in other developed countries don’t die from. And I could go on, and on...&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302262</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:57:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302262</guid><dc:creator>RU Kidding</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent question for her! &amp;nbsp;Since we can't believe a word that comes out of Hillary's mouth, she's decided to guffaw away until she can invent a suitable fairy tale response. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302364</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:13:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302364</guid><dc:creator>Alobama</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is it that it &amp;nbsp;perceived that Hillary supporters are so angry and childish in their response to polls that &amp;nbsp;show she is not likely to win the nomination? I'm a middle aged whitre guy from Alabama and I look at the mature and poised candidate. It seems Obama is more poised to deal with the issues that face this country . Hillary on the other hand says what she thinks people want to hear. Where is all the hate towards Obma coming from? Just because someone was married to and lived with a former President does not qualify them to be President. If so then I guess Barbara Bush is qualified too, oh and Betty Ford, Oh and Nancy Reagan....&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302367</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:15:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302367</guid><dc:creator>Alobama</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hillary needs to take her toys and leave the sandbox.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302373</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:17:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302373</guid><dc:creator>cache</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is not a response to the article. &amp;nbsp;This dickweed is a troll. The same exact post has been made on hundreds of blogs by the same person, regardless of the content of the article.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302396</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:40:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302396</guid><dc:creator>R. Lopez</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This candidate is CRAZY. &amp;nbsp;I do not want her near the White House again. &amp;nbsp;EVER. &amp;nbsp;If she's not laughing away something, she's lying. &amp;nbsp;It's one or the other.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302460</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:13:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302460</guid><dc:creator>katie1263</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I love Hillary Clinton, and I feel VERY CONFIDENT that she would be a phenomenal President. Maybe she started laughing because she is so fed up with defending herself that it just struck her funny bone. Hillary Clinton has an impeccable reputation in the Senate as being someone who works her ass off to make a difference. New Yorkers was sceptical about her at first, and now they LOVE HER. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So you know what Andrew? It is time for you to pull your head out and do some research.When Bill Clinton left the White House, he left us with a $560 billion surplus, and we are peace. His popularity rating was 65%, the highest exit poll of any President since World War II. So maybe it is time you except the fact that the Clinton's are VERY SMART and care deeply about this country.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302544</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:04:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302544</guid><dc:creator>marylynne</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that laugh is more of an involuntary spasm. &amp;nbsp;You know when people get nervous they sometimes get the hiccups. &amp;nbsp;Maybe the release of that giggle/guffaw stops her nose from growing when she is about to tell a whopper. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302563</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:42:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302563</guid><dc:creator>jabberwonk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;More Clinton Lies to add to the Stack of Lies : &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.jabberwonk.com/flinker.cfm?cliid=1loy2c"&gt;http://www.jabberwonk.com/flinker.cfm?cliid=1loy2c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302565</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:46:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302565</guid><dc:creator>emanism</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Katie when u say u love someone in capitol letters or r confident it sounds alomst like they can do no wrong. I dont hate the clintons but its a package deal whether u like it or not and im not comfortable with the extreme baggage they carry. The question is legit regardless of how much u like it or not. It does go to her credibility which she really has none on trade. &amp;nbsp;Well she cant fire her husband, can she? The laugh is a pause in thinking of an answer. &amp;nbsp;She will keep having to defender her credibility because thats what she lacks which shows that a majority of the people dont trust her. So im not so confident in her telling the truth. I think she is a good policy person but im not sure about the co-presidency whuch u think it wont be but it will...&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302569</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:49:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302569</guid><dc:creator>emanism</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh and Katie1263 his apporoval rating have gone down since then, lol plus he benefitted from the dot com bubble which burst just like the Housing buble. she is running on his record but when he does something the opposite she tries to &amp;nbsp;parse her rhetoric. PLEASE! Sure does not act like a party leader to me. At least thats what he used to be. The clintons has lost that.. sucks huh? &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302575</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:57:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302575</guid><dc:creator>emanism</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;HERFAN get a grip. He has more legislative experience than her and its Bill's record not hers. And where the hell is this 35 years of experience. Thats been false since she came under sniper fire...How can u believe anything the clintons say? She lacks credibility. &amp;nbsp;Thats goes to ur whole abliilty for the country to follow u. If u r not believable as a candidate how can u be believable as a President? Give me a break. This aint a sport. A fan! this is the Presidency of the united states. Ur stats r false any way like the 35 years of experience. We r still looking for them, lol &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: BRESLAU: What's So Funny, Hillary?</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/10/what-s-so-funny-hillary.aspx#302910</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:302910</guid><dc:creator>andrew of california</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Leadership and taxes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“It’s important to have core principles and values, but if you’re going to be active in policy and politics, you have to be a realist.” —Hillary Clinton&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re going to cut short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” —Hillary Clinton, in a 2004 fundraising speech to wealthy liberals in San Francisco&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bipartisanship and reaching across the isle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I believe in evil, and I think that there are evil people in the world.” —Hillary Clinton, in 1993, stating her opinion not of the terrorists who had just bombed the World Trade Center for the first time in 1993, but of those who opposed her health care reform plan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; “You have got to hand it to them, these people are ruthless and they are relentless.” —Sen. Hillary Clinton, just a few months after 9/11, giving her opinion of Republicans&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Health care&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We just can’t trust the American people to make these types of decisions. …Government has to make these choices for people.” —Hillary Clinton circa 1993, speaking to Rep. Dennis Hastert on the issue of who should control the allocation of money in her health care reform plan &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We can’t afford to have that money go to the private sector. The money has to go to the federal government because the federal government will spend that money better than the private sector will spend it.” —First Lady Hillary Clinton, in 1993, regarding health care reform&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Free speech&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We’re all going to have to rethink how we deal with the Internet. As exciting as these new developments are, there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gate-keeping function.” —First Lady Hillary Clinton, in 1998, days after the Monica Lewinsky story was reported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blaming America&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I pledge allegiance to the America that can be.” —Hillary Clinton, reluctant to say the Pledge of Allegiance, according to Chris Matthews&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The unfettered free market has been the most radically disruptive force in American life in the last generation.” —Hillary Clinton&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Imagination&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The fact of the matter is, I’ve always been a Yankees fan.” —Senate candidate Hillary Clinton, soon after launching her campaign in 1999, and ignoring prior public statements about growing up as a Cubs fan in Chicago&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item></channel></rss>