<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.newsweek.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Obama vs. Clinton: By the Numbers</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/16/obama-vs-clinton-by-the-numbers.aspx</link><description>6.7 percent : Hillary Clinton's average lead in the seven reputable Pennsylvania polls conducted (at least in part) after Barack Obama's remarks on the "bitter" small-town voters who "cling to guns and religion" first surfaced in the press last Friday.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)</generator><item><title>re: Obama vs. Clinton: By the Numbers</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/16/obama-vs-clinton-by-the-numbers.aspx#313098</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:35:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:313098</guid><dc:creator>revolved</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;100 percent: Amount of respect I've lost for Bill and Hillary Clinton over the last 6 months. &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: Obama vs. Clinton: By the Numbers</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/16/obama-vs-clinton-by-the-numbers.aspx#313344</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:56:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:313344</guid><dc:creator>Miande</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew, learn proper English! &amp;quot;Obama now trails Clinton by less than 25 in the supers sweepstakes&amp;quot; -- it should be &amp;quot;by FEWER than 25.&amp;quot; Being ignorant aboiut politics is excusable, not about proper usage!&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: Obama vs. Clinton: By the Numbers</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/16/obama-vs-clinton-by-the-numbers.aspx#313354</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:07:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:313354</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Romano</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Miande. Grammatical errors=bad. Such is the problem with posting four or five times a day with no editor, though--sometimes they slip through. I half-remembered that I made the dreaded &amp;quot;less than&amp;quot;-&amp;quot;fewer than&amp;quot; substitution but forget to go back and fix it. Thanks so much for the catch. It's corrected now. All best, Andrew&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: Obama vs. Clinton: By the Numbers</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/16/obama-vs-clinton-by-the-numbers.aspx#314629</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:52:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:314629</guid><dc:creator>mkroggasch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am staying positive about Obama. I only hope the electoral system doesn't fail, yet again. &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item></channel></rss>