Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

neophyte — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:13:28 GMT

Does this really have to go on until the last handful of puerto ricenos has spoken?

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

Cantabrigian — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:24:18 GMT

However, have you ever heard about Obama's "Bundlers?" Well read all about how the innocent Obama is making his $$$$$ The Washington Post Staff Story of 4/11/08. GOOGLE it.

"Big Donors Among Obama's Grass Roots 'Bundlers' Have a Voice in Campaign,"

By Matthew Mosk and Alec MacGillis

Washington Post Staff Writers

Friday, April 11, 2008; A01

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

Cantabrigian — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:26:54 GMT

This election will give Americans an opportunity to hold fast to democracy and vote on the merit of the candidates. Why shouldn't the woman who has the most qualifications get the job, rather than the guy with the backing of the ole-guys network and the most $$$$.

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

Chapalody — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:10:14 GMT

Don't you think, a person with so vast amount of experience could somehow get the super donors needed to win the nomination. After all, thats all we heard from Hillary supporters. Her vast experience is a plus for someone who wants to be president. If thats the case where's the money needed to finance her campaign. Hillary once said she's not dropping out of the race because she's saving the people from themselves. I guess she thought a comment like that was going to get her the donations she needs so desperately. Hillary's not staying the race because she wants to be president, she's doing it for the people. Again, if this is the case why isn't she getting the donations Obama's campaign is getting. Is it because Obama is a black man. Could it be because the voters want Obama and not Hillary. Could it be because the voters do believe in hope and change. If there was a deceptive glow like Obama's attackers would have voters believe, would Obama be ahead in the donations department. Maybe if Hillary had started with a little glow of her own, her campaign wouldn't be in ruins. Maybe if Hillary showed she could manage a campaign a little better the donations would be coming in. Who knows, maybe if Hillary handled her finances better, she could pay her bills. If there's one thing people don't like seeing, is their money thrown down the drain. Hillary's campaign does seem to headed down the drain and it's not because Obama is a black man and she's a woman. When you act like a winner, your going to get the money. When you act like a loser, then your going to have to settle for answering questions first and fail in the donations department. The buck stops with Hillary. Hillary is defeating Hillary. The pocket book is the first sign if something is working or not.

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

Thevail — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:39:50 GMT

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/pa-gov-ed-rendell-hillary-clintons-aide-endorses-farrakhan/3734830124

Farrakhan and Ed Rendell

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

tired and old — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:45:12 GMT

HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT A LEADER, HAS NO QUALIFICATIONS AND HER CLAIM OF EXPERIENCE FROM EIGHT YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE AS WHAT ( FIRST LADY ).

THE WHITE HOUSE PASTRY CHEF I UNDERSTAND HAS BEEN IN WHITE HOUSE 25 YEARS.

SO HE IS BEST QUALIFIED FOR PRESIDENT !

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

Stephany — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:37:24 GMT

Hillary Clinton and her organization keep whining that Barack Obama is spending two to three times more than she is. I bet if she could raise the money she would be matching him ad for ad. Doesn't it say a lot that Obama has over a million people like you and me so eager to send him contributions? I don't trust Hillary as she will say whatever she feels is needed to get a vote. I was also appalled to hear her tonight, on "Countdown" with Keith Oberman, clearly state that if Iran uses nuclear weapons against Isreal that she, as President, would retaliate by using nuclear weapons against Iran. This is insane! She would use a nuke on Iran that would send radioactive dust in the air to contaminate all the countries in the region. This woman scares me more than McCain does.

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

yupik1 — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:35:27 GMT

Who would want to vote for a woman who can't even properly finance her own campaign! Imagine how she would run the country? Scary thought..I don't want her anywhere near the "button."

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

lordmi — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:31:25 GMT

and this spendiing is aiming to rule the Country?

Into where?

When we have financial problem , financial disability of the candidate is worse than anything else ( also add phony , unliebility) - the loser portrait is ready.

No matter what PA will do. In a last word she promised to be bcak to 90th. Let her go there, and we will go forward.

p.s. Obama has More money because this is how we vote for him, even when our state is not playing. We still vote and we will. So he would not be in "red"

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

vp of common sense — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:13:56 GMT

Obama has already won. Hillary has bankrupted her campaign trying to keep up with Obama in PA.

I think it is fortunate that she will not be the nominee. She can't manage the fiscal responsibilities of her capaign - why should we trust her with the US economy?

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

tired and old — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:43:08 GMT

HILLARY CLINTON WANTS TO SPEND TAX PAYERS MONEY " CAUSE SHE IS ENTITLED ".

HILLARY LIKES SPENDING MONEY.

HILLARY WANTS MORE NUKE MONEY FOR THE WORLD WAR SHE PLANS ON STARTING ON DAY 1.

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

tired and old — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:08:24 GMT

HILLARY CLINTONS CONCERN OVER MONEY WOES!

BILL WE NEED A BIGGER VAULT TO HOLD ALL THE PRO-NAFTA MONEY.

MAYBE TWO WOULD BE BETTER.

re: Clinton's Cash Woes Continue

Tito — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:36:16 GMT

post‏

I ask, from the bottom of my heart, that every single person who reads this post -- no matter which candidate you support -- to please read the following article:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aW_Qty8aiVTo&refer=us

Please read it carefully because the "New Politics" have arrived and I don't know that anyone saw it coming. This article isn't for or against any candidate.

It outlines how this election has changed the face of American politics forever through databases on the Internet, containing personal information voluntarily given at the time of donation, which can now be sold to the highest bidder in furtherance of their political goals.

Power-brokering in Washington has reached a terrifying new height, with ramifications that will last for years to come. Our elections will no longer be "free" ... the voters will be systematically manipulated to serve the ends of whomever purchases their name from the list. This power exceeds any lobby, any coalition, any PAC ... it surpasses them all in its power.

We need to stand up and speak out against this before it's too late.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spell a grand slam in this game where word skill meets World Series. Get in the game.