<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.newsweek.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx</link><description>NEWSWEEK's Sarah Kliff reports from Washington University in St. Louis--her alma mater--on the run-up to tonight's much-anticipated vice presidential debate. A t-shirt on sale at the Wash. U. student union ST. LOUIS--At Washington University in St. Louis,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 2.18)</generator><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684225</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:51:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684225</guid><dc:creator>Bacalove</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;McCain's McMansion is for sale &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mansion includes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10 fireplaces (in the desert, mind you)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13 bedrooms&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14.5 bathrooms&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13,000 square feet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a wine tasting room&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;an air conditioned playhouse for the kids&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6 car garage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;an extra second garage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;surrounding the poll 3 ramadas with full size bars&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;22 flat screen tvs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And don't forget, this is only one of McCain's 12 homes. I especially like McCain's office that sure looks awfully similar to the Oval Office. Seriously, what kind of man designs his office to look like the Oval Office?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/mccains-mcmansion-is-for-sale.html"&gt;http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/mccains-mcmansion-is-for-sale.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684391</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:07:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684391</guid><dc:creator>4carol</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to know why the media is squelching the story on the investigation in Alaska!?????&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides the fact that Ms. Palin is falling in the polls mainly, it seems, because of her lack of showing that she would be ready for this high office, this important issue in itself could give voters the knowledge they need to make a decision which includes this person who was just thrust upon us a few weeks ago. &amp;nbsp;The voters have the right to know!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684399</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:11:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684399</guid><dc:creator>4carol</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;MCCain for sale; POOR BABY, OHHHHHHHHHHHH!&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684400</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:11:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684400</guid><dc:creator>mjno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How many houses McCain has is stupid chatter when we are electing a President. &amp;nbsp;Hey, he doesn't own any homes. &amp;nbsp;His wife does? &amp;nbsp;So should we debate how many homes candidates own. &amp;nbsp;Then choose? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democrats FOR MCCAIN/PALIN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palin has received more scrutiny and heat than ANY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN HISTORY. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684405</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:15:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684405</guid><dc:creator>mjno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to know why the &amp;nbsp;media is squelching the investigations (federal included) concerning OBAMA. &amp;nbsp;The voters have a right to KNOW especially about a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE. &amp;nbsp;Why the focus on PALIN, fear factor, 72 BOGUS, VICIOUS, RUMORS LAUNCHED IN FIRST WEEK. &amp;nbsp;Washington fears leaders like PALIN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palin's troopergate turned out that she did the right thing. &amp;nbsp;This was discussed weeks ago. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684417</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:22:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684417</guid><dc:creator>mjno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We live in a Free Country???? &amp;nbsp;I am not sure after this election cycle. &amp;nbsp;Who owns our Press, news media, etc?????? &amp;nbsp;Remember for months we heard about Senator Clinton and Bosnia? &amp;nbsp;Biden exaggerates it is excused because oh well, he is Biden.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,431604,00.html"&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,431604,00.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684448</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:38:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684448</guid><dc:creator>tiredoflies</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With the bar so low, it is almost impossible Palin can do badly at this debate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately Glen Ifill now has to be tougher on Biden just to prove she is not biased.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It does not matter much at this point because I know BEING CRAMMED WITH TALKING POINTS AND ONE LINERS DOES NOT RESULT IN SAGE DECISIONS IN THE FUTURE. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The true Sarah Palin has been clearly displayed through her own, and obviously very serious, &amp;nbsp;media comments thus far. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And about houses, it is NOT about the number of homes, IT IS ALL ABOUT MCCAINS RECALL ABILITY.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684454</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:42:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684454</guid><dc:creator>Vote 4 Change</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you voting for McCain/Palin because you think the media is picking on her? &amp;nbsp;Some of the people saying that sound really ignorant. &amp;nbsp;Forget what the media is saying. &amp;nbsp;Watch Palin in action. &amp;nbsp;Does she really sound like she's spinning or does she sound like she knows the issue? &amp;nbsp;I mean if you feel like she knows national issues and not just Alaska issues then by all means defend that but to gang up on the Media like they are putting these words in her mouth is ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684462</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:45:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684462</guid><dc:creator>Vote 4 Change</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;To the person that said&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;And about houses, it is NOT about the number of homes, IT IS ALL ABOUT MCCAINS RECALL ABILITY.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you! &amp;nbsp;This is exactly the point I've been making to people when they bring this up. &amp;nbsp;It helps me understand why he can make a comment like the economy is fundamentally strong. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684530</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:19:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684530</guid><dc:creator>tiredoflies</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;TO Vote 4 Change:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I got it. &amp;nbsp;Thanks for your response.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684534</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:20:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684534</guid><dc:creator>Sam10</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to be fair. Why is there all this concern for Sarah Palin, and where she will lead the country, the fact is that she has lead Alaska and by the Alaskan people, they think she is doing a pretty good job. &amp;nbsp;Now back to square one. &amp;nbsp;The only thing since she was picked by McCain, the media and Obama's campaign has gone after her tooth and nail with anything that comes to mind going as far as attacking her children. &amp;nbsp;All this questions seem fair to me, yet I don't recall anyone belaboring for an answer from Obama. &amp;nbsp;The messiah was allowed to waive questions off without a follow-up or having any answers for Wright, Rezko, Ayers. &amp;nbsp;This has yet to be answered. &amp;nbsp;The messiah comes out of nowhere with most of the democrats in the primaries advising us of how inexperienced and dangerous this man can be to America and the media just waive him off based on how he's run his campaign. &amp;nbsp;Baloney. &amp;nbsp;Wake up Obama zealots, this guy is phoney and the only thing good coming form his camp is .......... give me a sec. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#684714</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:31:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:684714</guid><dc:creator>ReasonWisdomAndPeace</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Typical Republican tactic... Cry favoritism or &amp;quot;gotcha journalism&amp;quot; whenever someone in the media exposes injustice, ignorance, inconsistency, contradiction, or plain old lies with their candidate. Isn't that what the media are supposed to do? Reporters and journalists represent the citizens. They are the ones who have direct access to the newsmakers, and they ask the questions that we the people are asking. With notable exceptions (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc.), media people are pretty smart. And yes, like most smart people, they see Barack Obama's wisdom, John McCain's inauthenticity, and Sarah Palin's ineptitude. Not every issue has two sides that must be coddled and delicately treated as equal players. Don't insist journalists deny their innate ability to recognize what's right and what's wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#685300</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:53:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:685300</guid><dc:creator>Opinionated1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know why McCain/Palin supporters act like it's the media's fault or Obama's fault that Sarah Palin bombed in her interviews. &amp;nbsp;It is clear to Democrats, some Republicans, and to Independents that she has not the knowledge and/or skill to be second in command of this country. &amp;nbsp;Are you guys so willing to throw this country into another 4 to 8 years of chaos with a VP pick who has no intelligent thought on todays most pressing issues. &amp;nbsp;Why are you so willing to throw this country out of the window because of your ideology. &amp;nbsp;Of course McCain is a great statesman, so is Obama, and Biden. &amp;nbsp;Gov. Palin is not a great statesperson. &amp;nbsp;I do not want to bet this country's future on someone that has a GREAT PERSONALITY only. &amp;nbsp;Wake up! &amp;nbsp;Look where the US is today, are you that naive to let it slip further. &amp;nbsp;We are looking for our best, our most confident, well we may have only 3 out of 4. &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Gotcha politics&amp;quot; and all that jazz, she has not the savvy to compete on this stage or the world stage. &amp;nbsp;I vote OBAMA/BIDEN.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#685345</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:15:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:685345</guid><dc:creator>Jurr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Palin bombed in edited softball interviews, she has yet to hold a full press conference....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCain was crying on Fox and Friends this morning about Gwen Ifill being biased and how he will just have to suck it up because life is not fair.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What a stupid jerk wipe. &amp;nbsp;McCain signed off on Gwen to be the moderator. &amp;nbsp;He failed to do his homework, kinda like forgetting to vet Palin. There seems to be a pattern.....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They were talking about this while showing a book entitled 'Barack Obama' giving the impression that she had already written the book and FOX had it on set. &amp;nbsp;Fox did not feel the need to mention that the book is NOT focused on Obama but rather black politicians with Obama having ONE chapter which has not even been written yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FOX you are disgusting, so are you McCain. &amp;nbsp;I hope Palin slaps you with a pair of golf spikes for ruining her political career. &amp;nbsp;For the record I do like her, but I also do not think she is ready for role of VP or POTUS yet. &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#685693</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:41:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:685693</guid><dc:creator>Johnny1967</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Bottom line, here is what we saw in the Vice Presidential debate:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Biden showed that he was a credible cadidate for Vice President and President.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palin showed that she was a credible candidate for a campaign spokeswoman. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the bottom line. &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#685773</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:29:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:685773</guid><dc:creator>cani77</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;n a few weeks we will make a choice &amp;nbsp;that will decide our future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, he perfectly predicted the current real estate market meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen in the next couple years&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide the largest morgage bank in the world,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch which are 3 out of the top 5 wall street firms. Also, &amp;nbsp;Fanny and Freddy Mae which hold 50 percent of the &amp;nbsp;home loans in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The government took them over because they are essentially bankrupt.If they didn't the entire financially system would virtually shut down, the stock market would crash and we would suffer beyond what any of us have seen before.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCain just like Bush &amp;quot; doesn't understand the economy&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That not just my opinion its his own words. Not &amp;nbsp;only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand exactly what &amp;nbsp;is broken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is no &amp;nbsp;surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities &amp;nbsp;use complex mathematical &amp;nbsp;models very few people understand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush's economic advisor &amp;nbsp;Phil Graham wrote &amp;nbsp;the deregulation bill &amp;nbsp;that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No one in this country can afford for that to &amp;nbsp;happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He either didn't care or didn't realize that anything was wrong. &amp;nbsp;Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he &amp;nbsp;helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a surplus like Bush did but a tanking economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. &amp;nbsp;Most of it Bush created &amp;nbsp;and it will take decades to pay it back. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So &amp;nbsp;why are the polls even close then ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairman of McCains campaign recently said that people don't vote on issues they vote on a personality composite. Which means he is trying to sell you personality instead of results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He believes people will vote against their own interests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hold them accountable &amp;nbsp;NOW! &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elect Obama Biden 2008 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out this video of sarah palins interview it will blow you away&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#685818</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:42:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:685818</guid><dc:creator>sirhc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;DOES IT FRIGHTEN ANYONE THAT SHE WOULD NOT ANSWER THE MODERATOR'S VERY FAIR QUESTIONS?!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DOES IT FRIGHTEN ANYONE THAT SHE WANTS TO GIVE THE VP MORE POWER &amp;quot;AFTER&amp;quot; CHENEY'S 8 YEAR POWER GRAB?!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#685845</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:51:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:685845</guid><dc:creator>Medge</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Now I know why they call her Ms. Barracuda. She did not answer the questions. If a Professor were asking her the questions in a test, and she would crossed the question, write her own question and the prcdeed to answer it, &amp;nbsp;would she pass the test?. The answer is no. So, in my book Sarah Palin failed miserably. She came prepared with questions and answers done for her by the McCain camp, and ignored the questions the moderator was asking, while she winked at the people that prepared her for the debate. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, the American audience &amp;nbsp;did not fall for it. They can recognize a phony when they see or herar it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, Sarah Palin with her $4oo make-up, her wink and white teeth smile, did not acomplish what she set out to do. She was a dismal failure; just like her failures in the interviews she had in the last couple of days, when she could not think of a single Supreme Court decision in the last two hundred years. Sarah Palin is out of her league. She should &amp;nbsp;quit the ticket and go back to Alaska dragging her &amp;quot;first dude&amp;quot; with her. &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#686204</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:45:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:686204</guid><dc:creator>willnotvoteobama</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;biden didn't answer the questions either ! she did great so get over it &amp;nbsp;fact is biden made at least 10 factual mistakes on his own tickets policy !&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#686411</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:23:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:686411</guid><dc:creator>willnotvoteobama</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Biden voted in 1999 for deregulation that liberal groups are blaming for part of the financial crisis. The law allowed Wall Street investment banks to create the kind of mortgage-related securities at the core of the problem now. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Biden Said McCain supports tax breaks for oil companies, and &amp;quot;wants to give them another $4 billion tax cut.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Biden is repeating a favorite saw of the Obama campaign, and it's misleading. McCain supports a cut in income taxes for all corporations, and doesn't single out any one industry for that benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the debate, Biden said, &amp;quot;Oh, on clean coal. My record, just take a look at the record! My record for 25 years has supported clean coal technology.”.... However, during an early campaign stop once he was announced as VP Candidate, Biden said, &amp;quot;No coal plants here in America. &amp;nbsp;If they’re going to build them, over there [China]. Make them clean. We’re not supporting clean coal.”. One of the most upsetting lines last night in the debate was Biden's attempt to say that he didn't know he was voting on a War resolution? I'm sorry but someone who has been in the Senate since Nixon didn't know he was voting on a War resolution when he voted on the Iraq War! &amp;nbsp;Let me ask you people does he think we are stupid? Or is he just stupid? Either way if a seasoned senator doesn't know when he's voting on a war resolution we have bigger problems in Washington then we know! And we certainly do not need a VP like that sitting with an inexperienced president! If you think things are unstable now wait and see what will happen if God Forbid Obama and Biden get to the White House… Sarah Palin did great last night. She was able to manipulate the debate by bringing the talking points back to the issues that she wanted to talk about to the American people! McCain / Palin will be a breath of fresh air for this country and will make a great president and vice president. The age of Obama will end November 4th &lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#687701</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:08:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:687701</guid><dc:creator>cani77</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In a few weeks we will make a choice &amp;nbsp;that will decide our future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, he perfectly predicted the current real estate market meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen in the next couple years&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide the largest morgage bank in the world,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch which are 3 out of the top 5 wall street firms. Also, &amp;nbsp;Fanny and Freddy Mae which hold 50 percent of the &amp;nbsp;home loans in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The government took them over because they are essentially bankrupt.If they didn't the entire financially system would virtually shut down, the stock market would crash and we would suffer beyond what any of us have seen before.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCain just like Bush &amp;quot; doesn't understand the economy&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That not just my opinion its his own words. Not &amp;nbsp;only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand exactly what &amp;nbsp;is broken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is no &amp;nbsp;surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities &amp;nbsp;use complex mathematical &amp;nbsp;models very few people understand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush's economic advisor &amp;nbsp;Phil Graham wrote &amp;nbsp;the deregulation bill &amp;nbsp;that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No one in this country can afford for that to &amp;nbsp;happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He either didn't care or didn't realize that anything was wrong. &amp;nbsp;Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he &amp;nbsp;helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a surplus like Bush did but a tanking economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit.Bush created a national debt larger then the first 42 presidents combined &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So &amp;nbsp;why are the polls even close then ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairman of McCains campaign recently said that people don't vote on issues they vote on a personality composite. Which means he is trying to sell you personality instead of results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's teach him we are smarter than that . &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;31 states are voting now, dont wait &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elect Obama Biden 2008 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out this video of sarah palins interview before you vote&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#687702</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:08:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:687702</guid><dc:creator>cani77</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In a few weeks we will make a choice &amp;nbsp;that will decide our future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, he perfectly predicted the current real estate market meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen in the next couple years&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide the largest morgage bank in the world,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch which are 3 out of the top 5 wall street firms. Also, &amp;nbsp;Fanny and Freddy Mae which hold 50 percent of the &amp;nbsp;home loans in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The government took them over because they are essentially bankrupt.If they didn't the entire financially system would virtually shut down, the stock market would crash and we would suffer beyond what any of us have seen before.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCain just like Bush &amp;quot; doesn't understand the economy&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That not just my opinion its his own words. Not &amp;nbsp;only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand exactly what &amp;nbsp;is broken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is no &amp;nbsp;surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities &amp;nbsp;use complex mathematical &amp;nbsp;models very few people understand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bush's economic advisor &amp;nbsp;Phil Graham wrote &amp;nbsp;the deregulation bill &amp;nbsp;that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No one in this country can afford for that to &amp;nbsp;happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He either didn't care or didn't realize that anything was wrong. &amp;nbsp;Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he &amp;nbsp;helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a surplus like Bush did but a tanking economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit.Bush created a national debt larger then the first 42 presidents combined &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So &amp;nbsp;why are the polls even close then ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairman of McCains campaign recently said that people don't vote on issues they vote on a personality composite. Which means he is trying to sell you personality instead of results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's teach him we are smarter than that . &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;31 states are voting now, dont wait &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elect Obama Biden 2008 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out this video of sarah palins interview before you vote&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#689103</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:09:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:689103</guid><dc:creator>cleobeo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Palin is a woman who likes to smell her own brain farts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#694478</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:43:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:694478</guid><dc:creator>willnotvoteobama</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;DEAR &amp;nbsp;MR. OBAMA,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am that segment of America you all currently call Main Street. I am as Middle America as middle gets. I have much more than blue collar roots. Well at least you could see Dad’s blue collar, rest his black lung racked soul, when he shook the coal dust out of it. I also did some time on the factory floor in Chicago before enlisting in the Army. There was no community organizer pretending to look out for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Life is not always easy out here where people live a real life, but most of us wouldn’t trade it for anything else that the rest of the world, including the alternate universes you live in, has to offer us. Your universe? That is where the basic principles of honor and morality were discarded long ago replaced by self-adulation. You lie to one another; you lie to us and worst of all you, with relative ease, you can look at your image in the mirror and lie to yourselves - all for the sake of political power, some self-perceived prestige or some utopian ideology that history has repeatedly proven a failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not the Joe Six-pack you envision. I know you better than you know yourselves and that of course will ultimately lead to your end. For us intellectually deficient out here that name just calls up an image of someone who is quite average, but I know what you see when you use it. That term of elitist endearment gives you an image of some pot bellied guy, wandering out of the liquor store with a 12 pack of beer, lottery tickets and half his butt crack sticking out from his jeans. Mr. Six-pack is your guy. He didn’t work today or most days because you extended his unemployment insurance. Your bus will pick him up on Election Day and you will give him a carton of smokes, promises of more of my money and maybe even a mortgage he can’t pay back for his vote. I don’t know what other images you get in your mind whenever you refer to me and the many millions like me who happen to populate this great land with one of those expressions you use to demonstrate just how in touch with us you really are. Your actions lead me to believe that you see a pathetic imbecile that cannot survive without your grand intervention, a collection of bitter, uneducated people clinging to guns and Bibles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe I should offer you another image. I go to work every day. I provide goods and services that people want and need. I get grease and dirt beneath my fingernails turning the wrenches that keep our great and free country chugging steadily along. I serve in the Police Departments, Fire Departments and Armed Forces of my country. I do many other necessary jobs that are probably well beneath your oversized egos and those prestigious educations of which you are so proud. I pay taxes. You waste them. I pay your salary by reading what you write; watching the movies you make and tuning in to the nightly propaganda productions you call objective journalism. If I contributed as little to my country materially and socially as you do, I could not earn a living out here in the real America. Neither could you. Your product, your Washington Speak and Hollywood nonsense have become quite stale. Imagine a place where a Barbara Walters enabled Whoopi Goldberg can call someone else stupid and you have the center of your universe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the past few weeks, we have come to know you even better. You have always tried to use class warfare to gain political power. Always pretending that you actually give a rat’s ass about Joe Six-pack living on Main Street, Middle America. No, Joe and everyone representative of Joe are just stage props for you. When you take off the tie, roll up your shirt sleeves being careful to not drop the cuff links, and walk the rope line talking pap about how deeply you feel Joe’s pain, it does not convince anyone that you are like us. When you media types, Hollywood nitwits, Beltway pundits and bandits dedicate all of your time trying to convince yourselves that the only way one from our working class could ever enter the Whitehouse is on a tour or with the janitorial crew then you have the class war you have always sought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’ll see you on Election Day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/JDPendry?a=6zC2mhttp://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/JDPendry?a=6zC2m"&gt;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/JDPendry?a=6zC2mhttp://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/JDPendry?a=6zC2m&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item><item><title>re: The View from Wash. U.</title><link>http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/02/the-view-from-wash-u.aspx#694496</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:10:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">544c64cf-7058-4151-925a-a0fd041e73dd:694496</guid><dc:creator>willnotvoteobama</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What if Barack Obama's most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you'd know what I was talking about. Acorn is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because Acorn works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. Acorn likes it that way. And so, I'd wager, does Barack Obama.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a story we've largely missed. While Obama's Acorn connection has not gone entirely unreported, its depth, extent, and significance have been poorly understood. Typically, media background pieces note that, on behalf of Acorn, Obama and a team of Chicago attorneys won a 1995 suit forcing the state of Illinois to implement the federal &amp;quot;motor-voter&amp;quot; bill. In fact, Obama's Acorn connection is far more extensive. In the few stories where Obama's role as an Acorn &amp;quot;leadership trainer&amp;quot; is noted, or his seats on the boards of foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects of Obama's ties to Acorn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An Anti-Capitalism Agenda&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To understand the nature and extent of Acorn's radicalism, an excellent place to begin is Sol Stern's 2003 City Journal article, &amp;quot;ACORN's Nutty Regime for Cities.&amp;quot; (For a shorter but helpful piece, try Steven Malanga's &amp;quot;Acorn Squash.&amp;quot;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sol Stern explains that Acorn is the key modern successor of the radical 1960's &amp;quot;New Left,&amp;quot; with a &amp;quot;1960's-bred agenda of anti-capitalism&amp;quot; to match. Acorn, says Stern, grew out of &amp;quot;one of the New Left's silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare Rights Organization.&amp;quot; In the 1960's, NWRO launched a campaign of sit-ins and disruptions at welfare offices. The goal was to remove eligibility restrictions, and thus effectively flood welfare rolls with so many clients that the system would burst. The theory, explains Stern, was that an impossibly overburdened welfare system would force &amp;quot;a radical reconstruction of America's unjust capitalist economy.&amp;quot; Instead of a socialist utopia, however, we got the culture of dependency and family breakdown that ate away at America's inner cities - until welfare reform began to turn the tide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Acorn holds to NWRO's radical economic framework and its confrontational 1960's-style tactics, the targets and strategy have changed. Acorn prefers to fly under the national radar, organizing locally in liberal urban areas - where, Stern observes, local legislators and reporters are often &amp;quot;slow to grasp how radical Acorn's positions really are.&amp;quot; Acorn's new goals are municipal &amp;quot;living wage&amp;quot; laws targeting &amp;quot;big-box&amp;quot; stores like Wal-Mart, rolling back welfare reform, and regulating banks - efforts styled as combating &amp;quot;predatory lending.&amp;quot; Unfortunately, instead of helping workers, Acorn's living-wage campaigns drive businesses out of the very neighborhoods where jobs are needed most. Acorn's opposition to welfare reform only threatens to worsen the self-reinforcing cycle of urban poverty and family breakdown. Perhaps most mischievously, says Stern, Acorn uses banking regulations to pressure financial institutions into massive &amp;quot;donations&amp;quot; that it uses to finance supposedly non-partisan voter turn-out drives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Stern, Acorn's radical agenda sometimes shifts toward &amp;quot;undisguised authoritarian socialism.&amp;quot; Fully aware of its living-wage campaign's tendency to drive businesses out of cities, Acorn hopes to force companies that want to move to obtain &amp;quot;exit visas.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;How much longer before Acorn calls for exit visas for wealthy or middle-class individuals before they can leave a city?&amp;quot; asks Stern, adding, &amp;quot;This is the road to serfdom indeed.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Your Face&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Acorn's tactics are famously &amp;quot;in your face.&amp;quot; Just think of Code Pink's well-known operations (threatening to occupy congressional offices, interrupting the testimony of General David Petraeus) and you'll get the idea. Acorn protesters have disrupted Federal Reserve hearings, but mostly deploy their aggressive tactics locally. Chicago is home to one of its strongest chapters, and Acorn has burst into a closed city council meeting there. Acorn protestors in Baltimore disrupted a bankers' dinner and sent four busloads of profanity-screaming protestors against the mayor's home, terrifying his wife and kids. Even a Baltimore city council member who generally supports Acorn said their intimidation tactics had crossed the line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Acorn, however, defiantly touts its confrontational tactics. While Stern himself notes this, the point is driven home sharper still in an Acorn-friendly reply to Stern entitled &amp;quot;Enraging the Right.&amp;quot; Written by academic/activists John Atlas and Peter Dreier, the reply's avowed intent is to convince Acorn-friendly politicians, journalists, and funders not to desert the organization in the wake of Stern's powerful critique. The stunning thing about this supposed rebuttal is that it confirms nearly everything Stern says. Do Atlas and Dreier object to Stern's characterizations of Acorn's radical plans - even his slippery-slope warnings about Acorn's designs on basic freedom of movement? Nope. &amp;quot;Stern accurately outlines Acorn's agenda,&amp;quot; they say.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do Atlas and Dreier dismiss Stern's catalogue of Acorn's disruptive and intentionally intimidating tactics as a set of regrettable exceptions to Acorn's rule of civility? Not a chance. Atlas and Dreier are at pains to point out that intimidation works. They proudly reel off the increased memberships that follow in the wake of high-profile disruptions, and clearly imply that the same public officials who object most vociferously to intimidation are the ones most likely to cave as a result. What really upsets Atlas and Dreier is that Stern misses the subtle national hand directing Acorn's various local campaigns. This is radicalism unashamed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But don't let the disruptive tactics fool you. Acorn is a savvy and exceedingly effective political player. Stern says that Acorn's key post-New Left innovation is its determination to take over the system from within, rather than futilely try to overthrow it from without. Stern calls this strategy a political version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Take Atlas and Dreier at their word: Acorn has an openly aggressive and intimidating side, but a sophisticated inside game, as well. Chicago's Acorn leader, for example, won a seat on the Board of Aldermen as the candidate of a leftist &amp;quot;New Party.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama Meets Acorn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What has Barack Obama got to do with all this? Plenty. Let's begin with Obama's pre-law school days as a community organizer in Chicago. Few people have a clear idea of just what a &amp;quot;community organizer&amp;quot; does. A Los Angeles Times piece on Obama's early Chicago days opens with the touching story of his efforts to build a partnership with Chicago's &amp;quot;Friends of the Parks,&amp;quot; so that parents in a blighted neighborhood could have an inviting spot for their kids to play. This is the image of Obama's organizing we're supposed to hold. It's far from the whole story, however. As the L. A. Times puts it, &amp;quot;Obama's task was to help far South Side residents press for improvement&amp;quot; in their communities. Part of Obama's work, it would appear, was to organize demonstrations, much in the mold of radical groups like Acorn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the L. A. Times piece is generally positive, it does press Obama's organizing tales on certain points. Some claim that Obama's book, Dreams from My Father, exaggerates his accomplishments in spearheading an asbestos cleanup at a low-income housing project. Obama, these critics say, denies due credit to Hazel Johnson, an activist who claims she was the one who actually discovered the asbestos problem and led the efforts to resolve it. Read carefully, the L. A. Times story leans toward confirming this complaint against Obama, yet the story's emphasis is to affirm Obama's important role in the battle. Speaking up in defense of Obama on the asbestos issue is Madeleine Talbot, who at the time was a leader at Chicago Acorn. Talbot, we learn, was so impressed by Obama's organizing skills that she invited him to help train her own staff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And what exactly was Talbot's work with Acorn? Talbot turns out to have been a key leader of that attempt by Acorn to storm the Chicago City Council (during a living-wage debate). While Sol Stern mentions this story in passing, the details are worth a look: On July 31, 1997, six people were arrested as 200 Acorn protesters tried to storm the Chicago City Council session. According to the Chicago Daily Herald, Acorn demonstrators pushed over the metal detector and table used to screen visitors, backed police against the doors to the council chamber, and blocked late-arriving aldermen and city staff from entering the session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reading the Herald article, you might think Acorn's demonstrators had simply lost patience after being denied entry to the gallery at a packed meeting. Yet the full story points in a different direction. This was not an overreaction by frustrated followers who couldn't get into a meeting (there were plenty of protestors already in the gallery), but almost certainly a deliberate bit of what radicals call &amp;quot;direct action,&amp;quot; orchestrated by Acorn's Madeleine Talbot. As Talbot was led away handcuffed, charged with mob action and disorderly conduct, she explicitly justified her actions in storming the meeting. This was the woman who first drew Obama into his alliance with Acorn, and whose staff Obama helped train.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surprise Visit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does that mean Obama himself schooled Acorn volunteers in disruptive &amp;quot;direct action?&amp;quot; Not necessarily. The City Council storming took place in 1997, years after Obama's early organizing days. And in general, Obama seems to have been part of Acorn's &amp;quot;inside baseball&amp;quot; strategy. As a national star from his law school days, Obama knew he had a political future, and would surely have been reluctant to violate the law. In his early organizing days, Obama used to tell the residents he organized that they'd be more effective in their protests if they controlled their anger. On the other hand, as he established and deepened his association with Acorn through the years, Obama had to know what the organization was all about. Moreover, in his early days, Obama was not exactly a stranger to the &amp;quot;direct action&amp;quot; side of community organizing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consider the second charge against Obama raised by the L.A. Times backgrounder. On the stump today, Obama often says he helped prevent South Side Chicago blacks, Latinos, and whites from turning on each other after losing their jobs, but many of the community organizers interviewed by the L. A. Times say that Obama worked overwhelmingly with blacks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To rebut this charge, Obama's organizer friends tell the story of how he helped plan &amp;quot;actions&amp;quot; that included mixed white, black, and Latino groups. For example, following Obama's plan, one such group paid a &amp;quot;surprise visit&amp;quot; to a meeting between local officials considering a landfill expansion. The protestors surrounded the meeting table while one activist made a statement chiding the officials, after which the protestors filed out. Presto! Obama is immunized from charges of having worked exclusively with blacks - but at the cost of granting us a peek at the not-so-warm-and-fuzzy side of his community organizing. Intimidation tactics are revealed, and Obama's alliance with radical Acorn activists like Madeleine Talbot begins to make sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Non-Partisan&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extent of Obama's ties to Acorn has not been recognized. We find some important details in an article in the journal Social Policy entitled, &amp;quot;Case Study: Chicago - The Barack Obama Campaign,&amp;quot; by Toni Foulkes, a Chicago Acorn leader and a member of Acorn's National Association Board. The odd thing about this article is that Foulkes is forced to protect the technically &amp;quot;non-partisan&amp;quot; status of Acorn's get-out-the-vote campaigns, even as he does everything in his power to give Acorn credit for helping its favorite son win the critical 2004 primary that secured Obama the Democratic nomination to the U.S. Senate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before giving us a tour of Acorn's pro-Obama but somehow &amp;quot;non-partisan&amp;quot; election activities, Foulks treats us to a brief history of Obama's ties to Acorn. While most press accounts imply that Obama just happened to be at the sort of public-interest law firm that would take Acorn's &amp;quot;motor voter&amp;quot; case, Foulkes claims that Acorn specifically sought out Obama's representation in the motor voter case, remembering Obama from the days when he worked with Talbot. And while many reports speak of Obama's post-law school role organizing &amp;quot;Project VOTE&amp;quot; in 1992, Foulkes makes it clear that this project was undertaken in direct partnership with Acorn. Foulkes then stresses Obama's yearly service as a key figure in Acorn's leadership-training seminars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At least a few news reports have briefly mentioned Obama's role in training Acorn's leaders, but none that I know of have said what Foulkes reports next: that Obama's long service with Acorn led many members to serve as the volunteer shock troops of Obama's early political campaigns - his initial 1996 State Senate campaign, and his failed bid for Congress in 2000 (Foulkes confuses the dates of these two campaigns.) With Obama having personally helped train a new cadre of Chicago Acorn leaders, by the time of Obama's 2004 U.S. Senate campaign, Obama and Acorn were &amp;quot;old friends,&amp;quot; says Foulkes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So along with the reservoir of political support that came to Obama through his close ties with Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, and other Chicago black churches, Chicago Acorn appears to have played a major role in Obama's political advance. Sure enough, a bit of digging into Obama's years in the Illinois State Senate indicates strong concern with Acorn's signature issues, as well as meetings with Acorn and the introduction by Obama of Acorn-friendly legislation on the living wage and banking practices. You begin to wonder whether, in his Springfield days, Obama might have best been characterized as &amp;quot;the Senator from Acorn.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Foundation Money&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although it's been noted in an important story by John Fund, and in a long Obama background piece in the New York Times, more attention needs to be paid to possible links between Obama and Acorn during the period of Obama's service on the boards of two charitable foundations, the Woods Fund and the Joyce Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the New York Times, Obama's memberships on those foundation boards, &amp;quot;allowed him to help direct tens of millions of dollars in grants&amp;quot; to various liberal organizations, including Chicago Acorn, &amp;quot;whose endorsement Obama sought and won in his State Senate race.&amp;quot; As best as I can tell (and this needs to be checked out more fully), Acorn maintains both political and &amp;quot;non-partisan&amp;quot; arms. Obama not only sought and received the endorsement of Acorn's political arm in his local campaigns, he recently accepted Acorn's endorsement for the presidency, in pursuit of which he reminded Acorn officials of his long-standing ties to the group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Supposedly, Acorn's political arm is segregated from its &amp;quot;non-partisan&amp;quot; registration and get-out-the-vote efforts, but after reading Foulkes' case study, this non-partisanship is exceedingly difficult to discern. As I understand, it would be illegal for Obama to sit on a foundation board and direct money to an organization that openly served as his key get-out-the-vote volunteers on Election Day. I'm not saying Obama crossed a legal line here: Based on Foulkes' account, Acorn's get-out-the-vote drive most likely observed the technicalities of &amp;quot;non-partisanship.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, the possibilities suggested by a combined reading of the New York Times piece and the Foulkes article are disturbing. While keeping within the technicalities of the law, Obama may have been able to direct substantial foundation money to his organized political supporters. I offer no settled conclusion, but the matter certainly warrants further investigation and discussion. Obama is supposed to be the man who transcends partisanship. Has he instead used his post at an allegedly non-partisan foundation to direct money to a supposedly non-partisan group, in pursuit of what are in fact nakedly partisan and personal ends? I have no final answer, but the question needs to be pursued further.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, the broader set of practices by which activist groups pursue intensely partisan ends under the guise of non-partisanship merits further scrutiny. Consider the 2006 report by Jonathan Bechtle, &amp;quot;Voter Turnout or Voter Fraud?&amp;quot; which includes a discussion of the nexus between Project Vote and Acorn, a nexus where Obama himself once resided. According to Bechtle, &amp;quot;It's clear that groups that claimed to be nonpartisan wanted a partisan outcome,&amp;quot; and reading Foulkes's case study of Acorn's role in Obama's U.S. Senate campaign, one can't help but agree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radical Obama&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Important as these questions of funding and partisanship are, the larger point is that Obama's ties to Acorn - arguably the most politically radical large-scale activist group in the country - are wide, deep, and longstanding. If Acorn is adept at creating a non-partisan, inside-game veneer for what is in fact an intensely radical, leftist, and politically partisan reality, so is Obama himself. This is hardly a coincidence: Obama helped train Acorn's leaders in how to play this game. For the most part, Obama seems to have favored the political-insider strategy, yet it's clear that he knew how to play the in-your-face &amp;quot;direct action&amp;quot; game as well. And surely during his many years of close association with Acorn, Obama had to know what the group was all about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shame of it is that when the L. A. Times returned to Obama's stomping grounds, it found the park he'd helped renovate reclaimed by drug dealers and thugs. The community organizer strategy may generate feel-good moments and best-selling books, but I suspect a Wal-Mart as the seed-bed of a larger shopping complex would have done far more to save the neighborhood where Obama worked to organize in the &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot; fashion. Unfortunately, Obama's Acorn cronies have blocked that solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, if you're looking for the piece of the puzzle that confirms and explains Obama's network of radical ties, gather your Acorns this spring. Or next winter, you may just be left watching the &amp;quot;President from Acorn&amp;quot; at his feast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Stanley Kurtz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;National Review Online&lt;/p&gt;
</description><category>Blog: Stumper</category></item></channel></rss>