Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, September 11, 2009 6:40 PM

Regarding the Pixi: I'm Starting to Worry About Palm

Daniel Lyons
...
It's this new smartphone that Palm just announced─the Pixi. Is this really the best Palm can do? We've already been hearing that sales of the Pre aren't going so well. And now, hot on the lukewarm heels of the Pre, comes . . . a tiny little phone that I can't imagine wanting to use, even if I got one free.

This is all a bit of a comedown for me─a year ago I really thought these guys had a shot. Last fall I got an early look at the Pre when I was reporting a big feature on Palm's turnaround attempt. That story ran in January, just as Palm was taking CES by storm with the Pre announcement and it really looked like Jon Rubinstein, a veteran Apple engineer, was going to lead this company back from its near-death experience. But by the time it shipped, in June, it was pretty clear that it was not going to be an iPhone killer. And that's too bad, because honestly, that's what Palm needed to do.You can't go against a category killer like the iPhone with a new product that's nice, or maybe even in some ways slightly better than the iPhone (as the Pre is, arguably). Palm needed to blow the iPhone away. It needed to reinvent the category. And, well, it didn't. It made a nice phone. A very nice phone. That's not nearly enough.

Ah, but Palm said, we were never trying to kill the iPhone, or compete with the iPhone. That wasn't the point. Um, right. That's why people close to the company, like Roger McNamee of Elevation Partners, Palm's sugar-daddy investor, were out making noise about how the Pre was so much better than the iPhone. And that's why Sprint ran ads comparing Palm's device with the iPhone. And that's why Palm got itself locked in a stupid tug of war with Apple over whether the Pre could sync with iTunes: Palm tricks iTunes into syncing with a Pre, and Apple puts out updates that break the connection, and so on. Truth is, Palm was always targeting Apple. And when it fell short, it started backpedaling.

The next fallback marketing line was that we shouldn't judge Palm's chances based on the Pre, because the Pre was not the whole enchilada. The Pre was just one device in a family of dazzling devices that Palm was working on, all of them based on Palm's wonderful new operating system, called Web OS. So what does it deliver as a follow-up to the Pre? The Pixi─a teeny-tiny cutesy little smartphone that is smaller than a cup of coffee (see above) and will ship by the holiday season. It has a camera, a keyboard, eight gigs of storage. A touchscreen. It's thin. It's light. Meh.

Advertisement

And, worse than that, guess what? The big brains at Palm chose to announce the Pixi on the same day that Apple was holding an iPod event─on Wednesday of this week. My sense is the Palm folks thought this would be a little poke in the eye to Apple, and that it would be really clever marketing, but, well, it wasn't. For one thing, Palm, get over yourselves. I know a lot of you used to work at Apple, but you're not Apple. OK? You're Palm. You cannot, in any imaginable circumstance, overshadow Apple. Go up against it and all that will happen is you'll get lost in the noise. Which is exactly what happened to the Pixi announcement. It got buried by the resurrection of Steve Jobs and a new Nano that has a video camera.

Palm is going to report earnings next week, on Thursday, Sept. 17. Nobody is expecting very much. But forget about this quarter, or even next quarter. What about the long haul? For this company to bounce back it needs a killer product. So far Palm shows no signs of having one up its sleeve.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: MichaelX (September 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM)

I want, I want, I want, I want! Get over yourself! Techno-weasels are a blight, and needing more and more failing technology is rampant enough. The peak is over, and it's all downhill from here.

Except for the makers of this junk


Posted By: mlarsen23 (September 13, 2009 at 2:10 AM)

So your only criticism of the Pixie is that it is too small?   What the heck is the problem with that?  Have you used it?   Is it that you want something that makes more of an impression in its belt holster?

Believe it or not, most people do not have an iphone.  Most people do not even have smartphones.  Most people have regular old (small) phones.   But over the next few years, the growth in smartphones will be huge.     Palm just needs to capture some of this growth.  It doesn't need to beat the iphone.

The iphone has some serious flaws that the majority of the smartphone market doesn't have, and that the Pre doesn't have:

- Lack of physical keyboard

- Not compatible with music software other than itunes

- Poor email software

For those reasons, the iPhone's appeal will be limited as long as it maintains its current configuration.   The many apps sound great, but the reality is that most of them are not even downloaded, much less used with any frequency.       Competitor OS already have most of the truly useful apps - even the Pre is quickly catching up and has started to offer apps (like a Google Voice app) that  Apple refuses to offer.

The Pre doesn't need to kill the iPhone.    It just needs to attract  the slice of potential iPhone users who are don't want a crappy keyboard and slow emailing, the slice of potential Blackberry users who are don't like crappy web browsing, the bulk of potential Windows Mobile users who don't like  Windows Mobile, and potential Android users who want better phones.   The Pre and the Pixie are  well positioned to do all of this.  


Posted By: sanityprevail (September 13, 2009 at 1:24 AM)

The best products rarely win without a killer marketing scheme to go along with them.  OS/2 was vastly superior to Windows, but IBM blew it.  Any number of reasons that iPhone or even iPod could be compared in a vacuum with another product and judged inferior.  It's the whole ensemble, the apps, the Apple allure of "coolness" and "superiority," kind of like Google.  One could probably argue that the repackaged MSN search with its stupid name (Bing? wtf?) is better than Google, but Microsoft is playing against their own game.  Evolutions with sex appeal can change tech, but sometimes a revolution with boring delivery barely finds the light of day.  This really seems like a simple concept to me, but multi-billion dollar companies don't seem to get it.