Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, April 17, 2009 10:25 AM

Obama at Georgetown: WWJD?

Holly Bailey
In his economic speech at Georgetown earlier this week, President Obama notably cited a parable mentioned in Jesus’s Sermon on the Mount. But that was it when it came to religious imagery—literally, it seems. Our friend Mark Silva at the Chicago Tribune picks up a story first reported by CNS News that the White House asked Georgetown to cover up all signage and symbols behind the stage where Obama spoke. It’s not that unusual of a request: The White House usually prefers to have flags and a plain backdrop behind Obama when he speaks. But the stink is apparently over what Georgetown covered up: A large monogram inscribed on the pediment of the stage that included a cross and read “IHS,” a traditional Catholic symbol for the name Jesus Christ. “The White House wanted a simple backdrop of flags and pipe and drape for the speech, consistent with what they've done for other policy speeches," a Georgetown spokeswoman told CNS. "Frankly, the pipe and drape wasn't high enough by itself to fully cover the IHS and cross above the GU seal and it seemed most respectful to have them covered so as not to be seen out of context." The White House tells the Trib it just wanted its usual plain backdrop and meant no harm.
Advertisement
Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: charles queen (April 20, 2009 at 1:44 AM)

I think that they went a bit overboard as far as covering up the IHS.Perhaps if it was a muslim symbol then Obama would have been all for it or mayby something Islamic in nature.He seems to have a pention for muslim and Islamic things


Posted By: paproudmom (April 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM)

to cm4297:  You say you are tired of Christians not carrying the cross - well it is proven that conservative christians give more to charities than others.  I would call that walking the walk.  While some liberals talk the talk but do nothing else.  You see I said some unlike you who paint a broad judgmental brush against others.  There is nothing wrong with symbols as long as they are backed up with actions.  It was disrespectful to go a Christian College and then ask for a symbol to be covered up.  All he had to do was go to a secular school if he wanted no Christian Symbols.  I don't know if you believe in respecting others.  I do and again that is part of walking the walk.  


Posted By: John Dough (April 18, 2009 at 8:35 AM)

This may have been just as simple as the Obama White House said they just wanted a plain backdrop. The problem is this White House has already showed a penchant for lying and promise breaking. The he did not bow incident, the about face on small business captial gains, his statement we are not a Christian nation, the no lobbyists in my administration lie and on and on it goes already 50 broken campaign promises. Can't we get some honest politicians? It is time for term limits and automatic removal from office for outright lying in public, certainly for lying under oath and other immoral activities adultery etc.. WE wonder why our nation is fracturing and crumbling before our eyes look at the examples we set for our children. If we want people to be honest and demonstrate integrity and moral behavior then we all must walk the walk.