Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, July 24, 2009 11:02 AM

Congress: You Need to Skip Your Vacation

Katie Connolly
Many moons ago I worked in a consulting firm. We worked against strict deadlines. Some days we just couldn’t work fast enough. On those days we didn’t get to go home at 8 p.m., have dinner with our loved ones, and get a good night’s sleep. We just kept working. Sometimes till 3 a.m., sometimes all night. We simply weren’t allowed to miss a deadline. We couldn’t tell clients that our discussions had taken too long. They were paying us to produce, and produce we would. If you had a vacation planned but your work wasn’t done, forget about it. Here at NEWSWEEK, if we are running late on a story, we don’t skip publishing that week’s magazine. We have a commitment to our subscribers. Even when I was in high school, if we didn’t finish our work, we’d have to stay after class. I think you get the point. The comparisons are endless. So here’s my argument. Congress has a commitment to voters and to the health of Americans. It also had a clear deadline. So why should it get to have an August recess?

Now, I’m no populist, and the populist tone of that last sentence irks me. I’m not one for knee-jerk reactions. Generally, I think it is important for members of Congress to take some time outside the Beltway, reconnect with their constituents, and brush up on policy ideas. I believe they mostly work very hard and deserve some time off. And I’d prefer a refreshed senator to a tired, crabby one. But here’s my point: the August deadline for passing health reform hasn’t been a secret. The president couldn’t have been clearer about his time frame for health-care reform. Certainly it is a complex and thorny issue, from both a political and a policy perspective. But given the dire cost projections and quality-of-life implications, it’s also arguably the most important public-policy issue of the moment. OK, maybe it’s tied with the environment and energy, but the difference is that health policy has been studied for decades. And as former senator Tom Daschle told me Wednesday, members of Congress have been thinking about these issues for years. Indeed, Ezra Klein smartly points out that the Senate Finance Committee has been holding hearings on the matter for more than a year. So why should Congress break the deadline? In my book, there’s really no excuse.

Personally, I’d like to see Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi exert some tough leadership. I’d like them to tell their members, in their best schoolteacher voices, that no one goes home until their work is done. I certainly don’t argue that this should be a precedent, just as I don’t contend that working like junior associates in banks and law firms is an appropriate or desirable business model. Far from it. But sometimes there are issues of such significance that they warrant the extra hours. Congress has a history of allowing important issues to languish and, in doing so, dilute the effectiveness of its solutions. As the president has pointed out, there are times when forcing a deadline is necessary to force action. The range of options is pretty clear, as is the scope of the problem. As Sen. Ted Kennedy pointed out in our cover story this week, reform is so close you can almost smell it. Taking a break won’t bring it closer.
Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: AMMO17 (July 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM)

THE CONGRESS GETS SO MUCH FROM THE LOBBYIST THEY DON`T EVEN HAVE TO SHOW UP FOR WORK.THANKS TO THE SUPREME COURT OUR CONGRESS CAN BE LEGALLY BRIBED.


Posted By: freemkt (July 27, 2009 at 9:14 AM)

akcoins-  The Constition is what this country is based on.  It lists the garaunteed rights of the citizens and outlines the laws in which Congress and the President can govern within.  It is the mentality that the Constitution "doesn't always have to hold on to the right thing" that is turning this country into what its becoming.  Whenever citizens want to claim a President is outside of his boundaries (Bush W., Obama, Clinton...), the constituents should look to the Constitution first...  but then, again, if your argument is valid, then the President can just say, "Since when does doing the right, and good thing have to be written in the Constitution?"  The concepts of "right" and "good" are subjective and the Constitution makes it clear what the government's priority does.  This healthcare reform is only going to turn the US into a Welfare state with no incentives to reach that "American dream."  The healthcare that the government with mandate will be the HMO of all HMOs.


Posted By: akcoins (July 24, 2009 at 7:41 PM)

Since when does  doing the right, and good thing have to be written in the Constitution? I think that we are the only industrialized nation that doesn't do this. Most of those Repubs, and blue dogs don't care about their constituents. The most vocal opponents in congress are the ones who get the most money from insurance companies (Max Baucus). The insurance companies are spending 1.4 million a day to fight health care reform. That right there should tell you something. It appears to be working, as they have gotten the bill delayed. They are not spending that much to look out for the interest of the people.