Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:48 PM

Five Important Health Care Reforms We Aren't Talking About

Katie Connolly

Much of the debate about health care reform in recent weeks has focused on a just a few elements of the entire reform proposal - things like the public option and end of life counseling. But the proposed legislation is complex and wide-ranging, and the national fixation with just a few proposals is coming at the expense of meaningful discussion on other reforms which could have significant impacts on the state of health care. Here are five other changes reformers are trying to implement that we think are worth talking about:

1. The health insurance exchange: The proposed exchange is the mechanism through which many currently uninsured or underinsured people will be able to access health coverage. Individuals will use the exchange (likely a kind of web portal similar to the Massachusetts Connector) to shop for plans that suit their needs. Private insurers will offer plans that conform to the exchange's rules, so they won't be able to deny coverage or price a plan based on individual risk. A public plan would be offered through the exchange, but it isn't a critical component of it. There's no public plan in the Massachusett's Connector, but the existence of an exchange has still fundamentally altered access to health care in that state.

2. Medicaid expansion: The House bill expands Medicaid eligibility to 133.5% of the national poverty level, which will potentially making another 17 million people eligible for Medicaid. 

Advertisement

3. Caps on out of pocket spending: This is one of several consumer protections that health reform would enforce. The House bill outlines a minimum services package, which includes hospitalization, emergency services, preventive services, prescription drugs and maternity care. Insurers would be prohibited from cost-sharing for preventive care, and out-of-pocket payments for the other services in the minimum package would be limited to $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a family. This change is significant, considering that around 60% of bankruptcies in 2007 were related to medical expenses.

4. Health system modernization: A study by the Commonwealth Fund found that more Americans report medical errors than citizens of six other developed nations, including Germany, France, Australia and the U.K. The House bill recommends the establishment of standards for electronic health record keeping, which aim to minimize errors and monitor patient history.

5. Requiring insurers who participate in the exchange spend more of their premium revenue on patient care: The House Bill requires that insurers who want to offer plans in the exchange have a medical loss ratio (which means the amount of their revenues actually spend on providing health services) of at least 85 percent, meaning they can only spend 15 percent of premiums on non-health related expenses. (Now, insurers routinely fall below that ratio.) The House Bill would require insurers in the exchange to provide some form of rebate if they don't reach the 85 percent threshold. 

** UPDATE** I've received several emails asking why medical liability insurance reform isn't on this list. That's because this is a list of things that are in the bill currently before the House. Tort reform is not in the bill at present, although I expect it will be debated when the bill makes it to the House floor.

Take Newsweek’s Smart Quiz and test your knowledge of current events in the world of politics.

Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Mobes (September 24, 2009 at 11:51 PM)

Why doesn't some one (Chris, Keith, Ed. Rachel) publicize a listing of all political contributions accepted by each congressman and senator from the health insurance and pharma industries?  Maybe this would jar some sense into some of the people who have been gobbling up the rediculous arguments and crazy lies that have been dished up by the Republicans (and those strange "Blue Dog" Dems).

Come to think of it, why don't they go right ahead and actively campaign against these special interest contributions...the most destructive component of American politics.

Never happen, right?  Still, it's nice to dream about what a magnificent country this could be if it did.  


Posted By: Sideline Watcher (September 14, 2009 at 4:10 PM)

Health Care Reform????

The Illness Perpetuation System is firmly & divisively rooted to hold this myth in place. There is too much money to be made and had by the continuance of the “keep them weak and long suffering” system, with the assistance of good capitalistic minded shareholders wanting to see the bottom lines looming larger, inflatable and ever ongoing.

The Pharmaceutical Corporations have dug in, fed the lobbyists, politicians, physicians, hospital and insurance systems as well as the general public into believing they know “Best”.  Never mind all the adverse side effects, counter indications, risks, black box warnings: the vulnerable are instructed to just take a good mix of fifteen or eighteen pills of various manufactured ingredients, at the recommended timing of three to four times a day, for several years. Medicare/Medicaid is just a small cost to pay for the legalized geriatric genocide that is silently taking place and attested to by the daily obituaries that are not trendy enough to read or that honestly reveal the true causes of deaths of the many. Bleed out ulcers are effective triggers and silent hospice assistants. Fentanyl patches work quietly and effectively well also.  With prescriptive patience, the patients usually don’t prevail.  No box cars, burning putrid smoke stacks, or extreme crowded housing units are required. With the diversionary plan of tackling the problems and knots of the “Health Care Reform”system in place, the boomers will feed the bottom lines rather well.


Posted By: dyanna (September 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM)

900 billion More for healthcare, More government interference with our lives. More government access to and control of our private healthcare decisions. The industries already Obam-opted-like the auto industry and the banks are not doing so well. Rushing into another Expensive government power-grab will be a big mistake in my opinion. This government can't  even get this years flu vaccine together correctly-but they want to oversee the whole Healthcare system. Right!!