Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com

The Gaggle

RSS
SPONSORED BY

Author

Katie Connolly


Ben Adler


Jonathan Alter

Eleanor Clift

Eve Conant

Howard Fineman

Sarah Kliff

Andrew Romano

Daniel Stone




Links

Featured Postings

A GOP Plan for Deficit Reduction

9:00 AM, February 9, 2010 | Comments (6)
I've been hard on congressional Republicans recently for pandering to voters' ignorance by offering politically appealing but irresponsible slogans instead of a credible conservative vision of how to meet America's challenges, even those they harp on...

The Press Evinces Soft Bigotry Against Republicans─By Not Expecting Them to Govern

1:05 PM, February 1, 2010 | Comments (21)

Conservatives React to State of the Union With Sneers and Jeers

11:50 PM, January 27, 2010 | Comments (18)

Archives

See All from August
Previous
August 2009
Next
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:36 PM

Boxer and Colleagues Feel the Heat on Cap and Trade

Daniel Stone
There will be plenty of time next month for the Senate to debate a cap-and-trade policy, but some groups have already decided that the bill currently on the table is not an adequate solution to national energy and environmental concerns─and they're making sure to speak up early. Later today, more than 320 environmental and energy groups plan to deliver a letter to Calif. Sen. Barbara Boxer and her colleagues on the Senate Environment Committee that she chairs, arguing that the climate bill that the House narrowly passed in June is too diluted to reasonably curb carbon emissions and spur growth in renewable energy.

Letters of support or opposition constantly fly through the halls of Capitol Hill, but this one is bound to turn some heads for the sheer number of names on it. The broad collection of signatories─form the Center for Biological Diversity to the Southern Energy Network and a whole host of municipalities, faith groups and social justice organizations─lays out in short form exactly what a better bill should look like. “A top priority must be to eliminate or greatly limit and restrict offsets,” which would allow carbon pollution to continue or even increase in some regions, the letter says. It also urges that the framework of the cap-and-trade program be more transparent, to limit how much big energy companies can manipulate the value of credits. And when it comes to setting limits and emission standards, the groups suggest overshooting current scientific projections, rather than falling short. (The current bill sets a target of 450 parts per million of carbon in the atmosphere, although climate scientists assert the number has to be at least 100 parts per million less to avoid catastrophic effects of climate change).

Delivery of the letter has been finely tuned for maximum impact: on the heels of health-care policy, the Senate debate on climate and energy will be among the highest-profile issues this fall on the Hill. But it’s far from a black and white negotiation. The reason the House version of the American Clean Energy and Security Act passed by such a slim margin─218 to 212─was because of a fierce and largely disconnected debate. House Republicans argued that the legislation would raise energy prices on working families and add another sag to the economy as companies adjust to the carbon-monitoring system. Democrats conceded energy prices would likely rise in the short term, but with foresight, a fully operational cap-and-trade program would lead to cheaper and more sustainable forms of energy, plus a mapped strategy for addressing global warming prior to the international climate conference in Copenhagen in December.

Boxer has made no secret of her intention to approve of a cap-and-trade program (along with most other Democrats), but when the bill lands in her committee, it’ll be her staff that takes the first crack at making changes. While some senators have noted that the bill in its current form will die in the Senate unless restrictions are loosened even more, others have vowed not to support a bill that becomes any weaker. The coalition letter ends with a simple yet resounding truth: “We recognize the massive political effort that is necessary to pass climate legislation.” That, everyone can agree on.
Advertisement
Tag(s): ,
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: LillyB0821 (September 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM)

Thanks for listing the link below.  I went there and it is a great site!  I agree with your comments.  The "secret" intent of this bill is to provide wealth to certain businesses and individuals.  A staggering 2.5 – 3 million jobs are projected to be lost if this bill passes.  Instead of protecting our citizens by helping businesses to remain viable during this global economic crisis, our legislators are considering a bill that would result in the death of our economy.  

Report Abuse
Posted By: mmtellsu (September 2, 2009 at 4:23 PM)

The Waxman-Markey Bill (H.R.2454)  is all cost and no benefit.....It is going to cost us plenty in the way of energy cost increase (25%!!)...it is going to cost our economy in the way of lost jobs (lost to China and India!!)

DON'T LET THIS BILL GET PASSED! CALL YOUR STATE REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON H.R. 2454!!

http://tinyurl.com/klfut8

Report Abuse
Posted By: ccitizen26 (September 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM)

It seems that support for the cap and trade legislation is waning on all sides.  The fact is that this legislation will directly lead to lost jobs for the American people.  Let Congress know at http://dontcapandtradeourjobs.net/?soc=tmtwt.

Report Abuse
Show All Comments (12) »