Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:59 PM

With an Eye on 2012, Mike Huckabee Plays the Sarah Palin Card

Holly Bailey

Nice guys finish last—at least that seems to be the lesson Mike Huckabee has learned from losing the 2008 GOP presidential nomination. The former Arkansas governor made headlines last week when he suggested on his radio show that the Democrats’ health-care bill under debate in Congress wouldn’t have covered Sen. Ted Kennedy in his final days of battling cancer. “Proponents deny that the bill would devalue older people’s lives, or encourage them to accept less care to save money. But it was President Obama himself who suggested that seniors who don’t have as long to live might want to just consider taking a pain pill instead of getting an expensive operation to cure them,” Huckabee said, according to Politico. “Yet when Senator Kennedy was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer at 77, did he give up on life and go home to take pain pills and die? Of course not. He freely did what most of us would do. He chose an expensive operation and painful follow-up treatments.” Over the weekend, Huckabee defended the accuracy of his remarks, but suggested his message was taken out of context by the media.

All that back-and-forth aside, what’s interesting is the big picture here: Huckabee's own political evolution from nice-guy candidate into fighting conservative looking to tap into GOP anger over the Obama presidency. In 2008 Huckabee ran as a friendly Republican who, at times, sounded an awful lot like a Democrat. Your Gaggler isn’t talking about social issues. As we wrote back in 2007, Huckabee was squarely to the right of the GOP. Among other things, Huckabee was and still is fervently anti-abortion and believes marriage is between a man and a woman. And he talked up issues that were red meat to the GOP base, like gun rights and changing the tax code. But what was interesting about Huckabee is that he often spent more time trashing Republicans at his town halls than he did Democrats. He chided his party for not doing more to help the poor and for not having compassion for the plight of illegal immigrants. More than anything, he chided the tone of attack politics. “I’m a Republican, but I’m not mad at anybody,” Huckabee told countless town halls in Iowa—a message that no doubt helped him to win the state’s GOP caucus, an out-of-nowhere win, despite having a little money and virtually no major Republican backers. He won a few more states after that, but it wasn’t enough, and Huckabee lost.

Since then, the former governor has gotten his own TV show on the Fox News Channel and has written a book about his experience on the campaign and the future of the GOP. He’s been campaigning for Republican candidates and appearing at GOP functions around the country—no doubt to build on the campaign he ran last time—although Huck, like others, is still playing coy about whether he’ll run for the White House again. Yet Huckabee’s efforts have been largely being overshadowed by another would-be GOP contender in 2012, Sarah Palin—that is, until he started talking a little more like Palin.

These days, Huckabee is courting the hard-core conservative base by tapping into the one emotion that seems to be motivating potential Republican voters: anger. And like Palin, he's getting a lot of attention for it. Besides the Kennedy remark, Huckabee has regularly used his talk show to trash President Obama’s health-care proposal by suggesting the White House is trying to pass a single-payer Canadian-style system. He’s gone after the White House on another red-meat GOP issue: spending. “Lenin and Stalin would love this stuff,” Huckabee said about Obama’s handling of the economy earlier this year. Fair enough, but what happened to the Huckabee who tried to run as a different kind of Republican? Seemingly gone is the kindler, gentler Huckabee, who talked about issues other GOPers didn't, and won over voters (and the media) with corny jokes and oddball campaign events, like jamming on stage with an Elvis impersonator in Iowa two summers ago. Clearly that message didn't help him win, but is Huckabee helping himself by tapping into the anger and attack politics he once condemned? Huckabee is still trashing his fellow Republicans, but it’s no longer for being the party of Wall Street or for being caught up in petty politics instead of caring about average people, as he used to say. As Huckabee told Fox host Neil Cavuto last week, the GOP lacks real leadership and therefore could not be responsible for the aggressive town-hall protests this past month. (It was all, he insisted, grassroots “bubbled up from the anger of the earth.”) “The Republican Party doesn’t have enough leadership to organize a two-car funeral,” Huckabee declared. “The Republican party is searching for a message itself.” Apparently, that's something Huck knows something about.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Colli (September 27, 2009 at 5:25 PM)

As an individual whose tendencies are more conservative than liberal, it pains me to say it but the combined intelligence of the Republican Party is not enough to win the 2012 election. Here is why I say this: Right now and for the near future (5 to 10 years), our country is and will be locked in what is probably the nastiest economic situation we have ever seen. Mitt Romney, who ran for the Presidency in 2008, is an economic genius but has been, and will be overlooked as a viable candidate because of his religion (he is a Mormon). Rather than run this well respected individual, the Republican Party will choose to back Mike Huckabee in order to gain the Bible belt vote. If Huckabee were to win the 2012 election, this would leave America in bad shape for another 4 years, if not longer. I doubt that Huckabee would win the 2012 Presidential election because he is a buffoonish egotist who likes the limelight and playing to the heavily Christian based Bible belt constituency. He has no real economic background and certainly nothing to compare to Romney. Without a doubt, the Republican Party will shoot themselves in the foot again and back Huckabee. The current fragmented leadership (if you could call it leadership) is a bunch of self-assured idiots. Fear of religious bigotry will keep them from running the one man who could help our country and unless I miss my guess, cost them the election in 2012. The one thing they have going for them is the fact that Obama has exhibited a total lack of economic sense and this will hurt the Democrat Party in a very big way. Obama has focused on anything and everything but helping to create the jobs that are so badly needed in our country because he really does not have a clue what to do. He is a political science major who knows how to play politics but little else. His selections for a cabinet and advisors are based more on a Socialistic “good old boy” control and support scheme than common sense and are certainly hurting the country. My fear is that 2012 will be just one more election where America is left with a choice of “The lesser of two evils” and we have lived with the results of such a choice for the last 17 years!


Posted By: dimplasm (September 24, 2009 at 6:19 PM)

Braes

There's also the issue of doghouses, pantyhose, and tons of other items purchased at taxpayer expense.  Plus the unfortunate habit Huck had of nominating and appointing people from his church to high level positions in government, regardless of the fact that some of them were flippin' nuts..


Posted By: help-mate (September 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM)

As a Souothern Bsptist, I was at first excited about  Mike Huackabee. I even donatted to his campaign. That all changed the day he signed onto FoxNews. Now I would not trust him to babysit my pet rock.