Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, September 11, 2009 12:28 PM

Senate Dems' Game Plan on Health Care

Katie Connolly

Ben Smith at Politico has got his paws on an interesting memo from David Binder, one of the guys who ran President Obama's polling and focus groups for his campaign. Binder conducted focus groups in Arizona to gauge voter reaction to Obama's address to Congress Wednesday night. Here's what Binder found:

The most strongly rated passages of the President's speech (with average ratings of 80 or above) break into three areas: 1) specific goals of reform (i.e. the specifics of the insurance industry reforms, increasing insurance industry accountability, and ensuring choice and competition); 2) the need for change now (i.e. the unacceptability of the status quo and that the time for bickering is over); and 3) the relationship between health care reform and American values.

Expect to see congressional Democrats mimicking these points in days to come. Undoubtedly point two will be of particular interest. Democrats will be looking to create a sense of urgency around the bill in September. None of them wants health care to remain in the headlines through the holiday season. And if it's true that voters broadly appreciate the president's message that the bickering and games need to stop, that gives Senate Democrats some cover to move forward without significant Republican support. The reason? On Wednesday, Obama essentially placed the onus for bipartisanship in the Senate on Republicans. As I wrote yesterday, he gave them a significant concession in pledging to tackle medical-malpractice issues. He also made clear that, although he's intellectually committed to the idea of a public option, he's not prepared to sacrifice his entire agenda for it. "It is only one part of my plan, and shouldn't be used as a handy excuse for the usual Washington ideological battles," he said. Liberal Senate Democrats haven't clung to the public option with the same fierceness as their House counterparts have, so when it comes to the Senate, he's referring to Republicans. If Binder's focus groups accurately reflect a broad desire for the bickering to end, then that's a green light for Harry Reid and Max Baucus.

Advertisement
Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: thehappyamerican (September 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM)

The DNC PLAN is to act excited about Obama live speeches coming faster and faster! More and more!

Blah Blah Obama!    Blah blah! "we're gonna".. blah blah "it's gonna".. but never any new ideas.

     Most of us can write our Senators--regardless of party-- and thank them for voting to cut funding to ACORN, which came to the fore from a  journalist team as "pimp/prostitute"  seeking assistance to open an illegal business!

      Just think! Real meth/crack dealer teams could be getting help from ACORN to set up illegal business in our communities!

      We should all thank all  the Senators who voted against these corrupt and corrupting Community Organizers! And ask them to persue ACORN with RICO laws!

   It beats watching Obama on all channels all day long! The community you save may be your own!


Posted By: MJ000777 (September 14, 2009 at 4:55 PM)

Dick said:  "As an ex-Republican (long term) and still a moderate conservative I would like to see the return of the 'Grand Ole Party' but fully recognize that isn't likely to happen until we totally reject what they have become."

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah.   So go ahead and support the Leftist in Chief NWDickG! That makes a whole lot of sense.

"It's the Economy Stupid"

~ Clinton Campaign 1992


Posted By: NewsWkDickG (September 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM)

Who can we trust: Some people's objectivities and sincerity are easy to question as their personal gain and bias are totally obvious and then there are those who simply benefit indirectly from the significant support and substantial contributions provided by Special Interests.  The current 'all out full court press' isn’t new; we’ve seen these aggressive tactics at work before in 2000 and 2004.  Then in 2008 Barack Obama was elected literally because the gross dishonesty and total neglect of responsibilities by Bush-Cheney favoring only Special Interests and a select few, being arrogantly and totally supported by the Republican Party, was recognized and rejected.  Maybe remembering the last eight plus years is a good guide to who we can trust as we really don’t want 'more of the same'.  To allow appeals to our biases, prejudices, emotional attachments or even racism to affect our rationality and objectivity may be just like 'shooting ourselves in the foot' as the Republicans continually just focus on giving benefit to less than 5%, as was so obvious with Bush-Cheney, while providing 95+% with only subterfuge and an 'in your face’' arrogance.  When the Health Care Reform is done we will see more of this same aggressiveness and subterfuge with Special Interests and their support rallying against the drastically needed financial reform to selfishly protect their control there, again with total disregard for the interests of the 95+%.  As an ex-Republican (long term) and still a moderate conservative I would like to see the return of the 'Grand Ole Party' but fully recognize that isn't likely to happen until we totally reject what they have become.