Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:09 PM

Obama Avoiding Kaddafi

Michael Isikoff

The U.S. government's policy of "normalizing" relations with Muammar Kaddafi─once touted as one of President Bush's major foreign-policy achievements and continued by President Obama─looked more embarrassing than ever on Wednesday when the erratic Libyan leader delivered a bizarre talk to the United Nations defending the Taliban and suggesting Israel was behind the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

"Why are we against the Taliban? Why are we against Afghanistan?" Kaddafi asked the leaders of more than 120 nations attending the annual General Assembly debate. "If the Taliban wants to make a religious state, OK, like the Vatican. Does the Vatican constitute a danger against us?"

Even before the talk, two of President Obama's chief foreign-policy aides told families of the victims of the 1988 Pan Am 103 bombing that the White House was taking painstaking precautions to prevent any presidential interaction with Kaddafi, according to two of those who attended the session and described it to NEWSWEEK.

Advertisement

The two presidential aides who addressed the families─John Brennan, who oversees counterterrorism policy at the National Security Council, and deputy national-security adviser Denis McDonough─also promised to work toward the release of U.S. government files that would clearly establish Libyan complicity in the Lockerbie bombing, said Frank Duggan, president of the Victims of Pan Am 103, and Kathy Tedeschi, whose husband was among the 189 Americans killed on the Pan Am flight and who serves as vice president of the group.

The release of FBI, CIA, and other files is being sought by the families to help counter stories emanating in the British press and some American publications in recent weeks suggesting that Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the former Libyan intelligence officer convicted of the bombing who was recently released by the Scottish government, was wrongly convicted, said Duggan.

The White House aides told the group, "The government would take an active role in combating a lot of these phony stories saying that the guy was innocent," according to Duggan. A White House spokesman confirmed that Brennan and McDonough spoke to the group Tuesday night but did not comment on details of the discussion.

The prospect of a controversy over Kaddafi's presence in New York has been building for months, especially after the Libyan government─as NEWSWEEK reported last month─asked for permission to pitch his trademark Bedouin tent in Central Park.

But furor over Kaddafi's first-ever trip to the United States erupted when Megrahi flew back to Tripoli and received a hero's welcome. The release of the convicted terrorist─on humanitarian grounds, according to the Scots (Megrahi is suffering from terminal prostate cancer)─infuriated U.S. law-enforcement officials and raised new questions about U.S. policy to move toward closer relations with the Libyan regime. That policy was pushed in part by U.S. oil companies and other business interests.

The policy of "normalizing" relations began under President Bush after Kaddafi renounced his nuclear-weapons program, prompting the Bush administration to declare that Libya, long an international pariah,  "can be a source of stability in Africa and the Middle East."

By last year, after it agreed to pay full compensation to the Lockerbie families, Libya was removed from the State Department list of "state sponsors" of terrorism, and the U.S. reopened an embassy in Tripoli. That policy continued under Obama: in July, Acting Assistant Secretary of State Jeffrey Feltman flew to Tripoli and said the U.S. wanted greater military cooperation with Libya in order to fight terrorism in northern Africa.

But that and other moves to strengthen U.S.-Libyan ties are now called into doubt as a result of the uproar over Megrahi, an event that reminded some U.S. officials and the Lockerbie families about Kaddafi's long ties to terrorism.

In Tuesday night's meeting with the Lockerbie family members, Brennan, a veteran former senior CIA official, reminded them that he had a personal connection to the Pan Am case: a longtime friend and colleague from the agency, Matthew Gannon, was killed on the flight. Brennan assured the group that the Obama White House had no "heads up" that Megrahi would be released. More important, he said the White House was taking elaborate steps to make sure that Obama (who spoke to the U.N. immediately before Kaddafi) never crossed paths with the Libyan leader, according to Duggan. The White House was going to make sure that Obama and Kaddafi "never got anywhere near each other," he said. (That alone is a change from last July when Obama, finding himself next to the Libyan leader at the G8 summit in Rome, was photographed shaking Kaddafi's hand.)

The distancing was readily apparent at the U.N. today when top U.S. officials─including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice─left the hall as Kaddafi approached the podium to speak.

In his talk,  Kaddafi, wearing a long, flowing, brown robe and speaking in rapid-fire Arabic, denounced the Security Council ("It should not be called the Security Council. It should be called the Terror Council") and at one point seemed to suggest the Israelis were behind the 1963 Kennedy assassination. His apparent reasoning: Jack Ruby, the killer of Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, was an "Israeli" agent. (Ruby was Jewish but had no known tie to Israel.)

"He portrayed himself as the bumbling idiot that he is," said Tedeschi, the vice president of the Lockerbie group, after the speech. "He ranted about everybody else's wrongdoing in the world except his own."

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: hornet121 (September 24, 2009 at 4:18 PM)

I am getting so confused with the world who is telling the truth is it us, them, anybody who is lying, is it you mr. Isikoff, is it Kadafi, is it our govenment, there is change coming not only here but the whole world, we can either fight them or join them.


Posted By: Carlito3557 (September 24, 2009 at 3:30 AM)

Unlike Qaddafi or Ahmedinejad, I am able to excoriate the United States for its moral hypocrisy without sounding witless.  Politicians and citizens in New York were horrified by Qaddafi's tent and his warm welcome for the Lockerbie bomber when he returned to die from terminal prostate cancer in Libya.  How can anyone coddle terrorists like the Lockerbie bomber? After all, he's a monster who killed a lot of innocent people. Why should he be welcomed to our shores?

Are these same people aware that our country's immigration court has given political asylum to a man widely suspected of placing bomb materials in a Cuban airliner in October 1976, which killed 73 Cubans, many of whom were teenagers, in what has been described as "the first and only mid-air bombing of a civilian airliner in the Western Hemisphere."  An anti-Castro Cuban, former CIA operative named Luis Posada Carriles, who, at the time of the bombing, was living in Venezuela, has been the subject of an extradition warrant issued by Venezuela since 1976.  There is credible evidence, including his own admissions, that Posada Carriles was responsible for the same kind of crime that the Libyan Lockerbie bomber committed.  For more than 30 years, both Venezuela and Cuba have clamored for Posada Carriles extradition to Venezuela to face a court of law for the crime of international terroris.  Posada rriles entered the United States in the 1990s, and later claimed political asylum that precludes him from facing justice in Venezuela.  Despite the evidence against Posada Carriles and the shocking nature of the crime he almost surely committed, Posada Carilles was granted political asylum by an immigration judge on the ground that, were he extradited to Venezuela, he would likely face torture.  At this juncture, no one needs to be reminded that hundreds of Arabs have faced or actually experienced torture in violation of international law at the hands of CIA and CIA-hired contractors acting with the imprimatur of Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld.  

Do Americans have any sympathy for the 73 victims of the Cuban's bomber's vile act of terrorism? Probably 99% of Americans have no idea about Posada Carriles and the shelter he has received from the US "justice system."  On a a different note, although most Americans feel deep sympathy for the atrocities Jews suffered during the Holocaust, do Americans have any sympathy for the atrocities that have been or are now being committed again Palestinian or Lebanese victims by Israeli state terrorism perpetrated in the name of defending Israel from terrorism?  Are they aware that, for every Israeli who perishes as a result of "suicide bombers" 10 Arab civilians have died because of the Israeli Defense Forces bombs released over Arab villages and cities (recall the bombing of apartment houses in Beirut in 2006, which was televised for all Americans to see).

Stupidity joined with moral hypocrisy--for Americans, the only operative principle is whose ox is gored.  


Posted By: mkf1 (September 24, 2009 at 2:43 AM)

Qaddhafi presides over Libya, a true democracy. Any student of political science knows America is not a democracy, but a republic. Qaddhafi wrested Libya from a nightmare police state owned by Americans, two massive military bases, Tobruk and Benghazi, police checkpoints everywhere like communist Russia. No wonder Qaddhafi hates the American invaders and occupiers of his country. When he wrested control of Libya from Americans, Americans bombed his home. Dont expect any sympathy from me when it comes to American bullying around the world.