Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Friday, September 25, 2009 9:50 AM

More Details on What the U.S. Knows About Iran's Secret Nuclear Site

Mark Hosenball

A U.S. counterproliferation official tells NEWSWEEK that intelligence agencies have been tracking the construction of this secret Iranian facility, built inside a mountain, for a matter of years. It is not finished, and the earliest they think it could become operational is a year from now or longer. One of the main reasons that President Obama, along with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, felt it was appropriate to talk about it now is that Iran for the first time acknowledged the facility to the International Atomic Energy Agency earlier this week.

Another reason they may have decided to confirm the site's existence now is to get the story out before the Iranians circulate their own spin—which could be that this place is a pilot research facility. To U.S. and other Western officials, what's striking about the facility is its size: it's estimated to have the capacity to hold 3,000 centrifuges. The reason the U.S. and other countries think the facility is probably intended for producing highly enriched uranium for weapons is that it is too small to enrich the large quantities of uranium needed for a civilian power program, a U.S. counterproliferation official tells NEWSWEEK.

The official adds that the disclosure of the secret enrichment facility does not for the moment alter other judgments by U.S. intelligence agencies, including the conclusion, reported by NEWSWEEK earlier this month, that Iran has not restarted a program to specifically develop a nuclear bomb. U.S. agencies believe Iran was working specifically to develop a bomb until 2003, but then stopped its work on that program and has not resumed it. However, U.S. officials have always maintained that mastering the enrichment of uranium is the most difficult process in building a nuclear bomb, and many officials also believe that Iran may have acquired enough additional technology to put in place a kind of standby bomb-development program that could be rapidly restarted if a decision were taken to do so.

UPDATE: 

The secret enrichment facility is understood to be located on a military base near the holy city of Qum, according to a U.S. counterproliferation official. Iran is already making excuses for why it did not disclose the facility's existence earlier, to the public or to international nuclear regulators at the IAEA. In Tehran's view, international regulations do not require it to disclose the existence of such a facility until six months before nuclear material is going to be used in it. This interpretation of international standards is not shared by the U.S. and its allies.

Advertisement

A European diplomatic source says the disclosure of the secret Iranian project is certain to add urgency to international discussions regarding possible new sanctions against Iran. The first move to step up such sanctions would probably involve Western efforts to place new restrictions on financial transactions and trade with Iran, including drastic curbs on the sale to that country of equipment used to refine crude oil into gasoline. (Less likely, at least in the near future, would be Western sanctions curbing the sale of refined gasoline to Iran, a concept that some U.S. anti-Iran activists are promoting.)

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: Trooper101st (January 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM)

ISLAMIC THEOCRACY+NUCLEAR WEAPONS=The West and Gulf nations held hostage..plus the threat to ISRAEL..we can only wait so long...


Posted By: Steve in Alaska (September 27, 2009 at 7:25 PM)

Part of the problem with Iran currently is the 'tough talk' of its president. He is threatening another nation (Israel), claims the 'Holocaust' did not happen,  keeps nuclear sites secret, and refused to consider using 'light water' nuclear reactors. Consider the following:

1. A 'light water' reactor, which can not be used to 'breed' plutonium for nuclear weapons AND is exceptionally safe, was offered to Iran several years ago. Iran refused. This is a major concern to the international community. The reason: Chernobyl. Iran's new reactor is reported to be a graphite breeder reactor. These are unstable, as the Chernobyl disaster (meltdown) showed.

2. The 'Holocaust' DID INDEED happen! Even the Soviet Union (now Russia) saw the work of Hitler's SS first hand. Even they do not attempt do deny it happened. Joseph Stalin even acnowledged it happened, as he saw the proof first hand! So why does Iran's president continue to deny the truth? Has he EVER visited the Auschwitz sites (plural)?

3. Threats against another nation alarms the world, especially when a nuclear-armed nation is the one being threatened (Isreal). "Isreal should be wiped off the face of the world"-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. World Wars I & II started this way. So did Desert Storm. Do we really need another useless war?

4. I can understand keeping nuclear sites secret, due to national security. But to keep them secret from the IAEA for as long as Iran has is pure insanity. The IAEA was formed to protect a developing nation's people from the harm of a nuclear accident by providing them with the means to ensure that the accident will not happen in the first place! Like containment vessel technology, that prevented the release of a nuclear cloud from the United States's '3 Mile Island' accident. (Chernobyl did not have a 2-layer containment shell.) Triple backup cooling systems and computers that can override human mistakes, developed after the Soviet Union's 'Chernobyl' accident. Coolant was shut off in both accidents! Will Iran have these safegards? Probably not, if they will not cooperate with the IAEA. This will put the ENTIRE region at risk.

And yes, the West needs to keep its political nose out of the IAEA's buisness until the IAEA asks for Security Council to intervene. This is the way that agency was intended to operate to begin with. And the Soviet Union & the United States DID cooperate with the IAEA from its inception. This is how the world knows what happened at Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island!


Posted By: Bani (September 27, 2009 at 7:30 AM)

Who should the Iranians have disclosed the new reactor to? To be fair, Europe and The United States do not disclose any new reactor manufactured by them, to others, perhaps, they are not secret.

This is a matter of trust.It seems that they have always been skeptic  on what is going on in Iran.There are many countries having similar nuclear sites but they are not making headlines.