Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:37 PM

Dems Vote Down Public Option Twice

Katie Connolly

Five Senate Democrats sounded the death knell for Jay Rockefeller's public-option amendment in the Finance Committee today. Rockefeller's amendment was voted down 15-8. Joining all the GOP members in voting against the amendment were committee chairman Max Baucus (Montana), Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas), Bill Nelson (Florida), Kent Conrad (North Dakota), and Tom Carper (Delaware). Those names shouldn't come as a surprise. They're all moderate or conservative Democrats. Lincoln is facing a tough reelection in a conservative state next year, Montana and North Dakota are red states, and Florida has a large number of senior voters who are the demographic most opposed to health-care reform. According to the Huffington Post's Ryan Grim, Baucus said that Rockefeller's amendment would have caused the bill to fail on the Senate floor. "I fear if this provision is in the bill, it will hold back meaningful reform this year," Baucus said, according to CNN. The committee then voted on a similar, if slightly less liberal, amendment offered by Chuck Schumer of New York. It was shot down 13-10 with two Democrats, Nelson and Carper, switching their positions.

Prospects for a public option aren't entirely dead. There's still the possibility of a public-option trigger that Olympia Snowe, who voted against Rockerfeller today, has expressed support for. It has yet to be discussed by the Finance Committee.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: boom shaka (September 30, 2009 at 6:38 PM)

"If you take a look at my previous post , you'll see you could be a poster boy of the not so smart people that want us to stay with our current system"

Hey, moron,  read a post BEFORE you reply to it.

The "power grab" claim came from ANOTHER poster, you idiot.  If you had actually read my post you'd see me dispute the very notion of a "power grab" AS WELL AS the notion that we're facing "socialized" medicine.

You would also have seen this:

"PS--yes, I do support the president, and, no, I don't really care if the public option is in the bill or not"

Does the President support the current system?  Then why the heck would I????

Stop being so obtuse, you're just as bad as the conservatives.  So try to get a grip and the clue that comes along with it (it's not a bad thing, you should try it sometime).

Regards,

BS


Posted By: gvillagran3 (September 30, 2009 at 10:10 AM)

Boom Shaka.

If you take a look at my previous post , you'll see you could be a poster boy of the not so smart people that want us to stay with our current system , because we need to continue to be Capitalists.... WHen we are anything but Capitalists in our dealings. Unless you think that bribery is part of Capitalist Economic dogma.

So cut the grand standing, and take a look at REALITY. The "Power grab " that according to you Congress wanted to make by trying to cut sky rocketing costs can only be a "power grab" is you work for the INsurance Industry, or are stupid enough to believe that the Insurance Industry is going to some how control costs out of the kindness of their hearths.

So instead of "power grabs", you let the Health Care Industry to continue to POWER GRAB OUR WALLETS into oblivion........ Man, you most be some kind of a masochist.

Let me pay more !!!!! Let me get less !!!!!  Let me go to the poor house as a Capitalist !!!!


Posted By: gvillagran3 (September 30, 2009 at 9:36 AM)

Boom Shaka.

If you take a look at my previous post , you'll see you could be a poster boy of the not so smart people that want us to stay with our current system , because we need to continue to be Capitalists.... WHen we are anything but Capitalists in our dealings. Unless you think that bribery is part of Capitalist Economic dogma.

So cut the grand standing, and take a look at REALITY. The "Power grab " that according to you Congress wanted to make by trying to cut sky rocketing costs can only be a "power grab" is you work for the INsurance Industry, or are stupid enough to believe that the Insurance Industry is going to some how control costs out of the kindness of their hearths.

So instead of "power grabs", you let the Health Care Industry to continue to POWER GRAB OUR WALLETS into oblivion........ Man, you most be some kind of a masochist.

Let me pay more !!!!! Let me get less !!!!!  Let me go to the poor house as a Capitalist !!!!