Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:02 AM

The Impending Implosion of California Gov Hopeful Gavin Newsom

Daniel Stone

As political life goes, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom had a good day yesterday. He jetted south from the city by the bay to meet up with his new buddy President Clinton to tour a green building in Los Angeles. The cameras clicked and the two exchanged laughs. Then, according to the L.A. Times, the pair talked with a group of students about green energy and jobs before heading to a fundraiser that, with Clinton by Newsom's side, surely made for a pocket-padding evening.

Read between the lines, though, and the picture doesn’t look quite as rosy for him. Sure, it’s impressive for the mayor of America’s 12th-largest city to be posing for pictures with a former—and still popular—Democratic president. But Newsom’s problem is one of poor timing, which reveals many more weaknesses in his campaign than strengths.

With more than a year to go before California’s 2010 gubernatorial showdown, Newsom had raised just $1.2 million as of this summer when fundraising numbers were last disclosed. It might be a respectable amount for governors' races in other states, but it's chump change next to his leading opponent's $7.4 million in the bank. Even his would-be GOP rival (in a state that traditionally goes blue) has outraised him more than sixfold. Several Democratic insiders who once believed Newsom had one of the best shots at the crown now tell him that to maintain his credibility, he’ll need at the very least a few more million in the bank before the end of the year. If not, he’ll look like a weak candidate who, perhaps suspiciously, can’t build momentum.

Which explains why he’d call in Bill Clinton, who endorsed Newsom late last month. By any measure, Clinton is a pretty big gun, arguably the biggest nod in Democratic politics next to Barack Obama. Clinton could, and will, help Newsom raise some serious aforementioned cash. But this early? The former president has been known to work wonders as a closer, yet tapping him as an opener instead almost proves that Newsom’s flame is in danger of going out. A powerful endorsement is something normally saved to be witnessed by the maximum number of cameras and undecided voters. Used wisely, it’s a valuable weapon: if Newsom were locked in a dead heat with a primary or even general-election opponent, a thumbs up from Clinton could give him a boost. But rolling out the big guns before most candidates have even declared strikes of desperation, rather than strength.

For his part, Clinton’s interest in the race might not be purely benevolent. While he took a strong liking to Newsom early in the young politician’s career, he also crafted a strong dislike for Newsom’s most formidable opponent, Jerry Brown, who has yet to formally declare, but is raising money and leads handily in polls. Brown, who was California's governor once already, ran against Clinton for the presidential nomination in 1992, a race that had less than cordial moments. Clinton and his camp have maintained that supporting Newsom is solely a reflection of how the former president feels about the mayor and his ideas.

Still, it's tough to imagine that Newsom, who once rode high as the Golden State's golden boy, could run out of gas too early. Just two years ago he was being mentioned as a possible heir to Sen. Dianne Feinstein's seat if the senior senator had chosen to run for governor in 2010 (some state poll numbers still suggest she'd do well, although she hasn't indicated any intent to run). So what happened to Newsom? The mayor might be popular in San Francisco, but most of California isn't like San Francisco, especially the state's more conservative Central Valley, parts of which have fortified in opposition to Obama. Not to mention one of Newsom's signature issues: gay marriage, which the state swatted down in the passage of Prop 8 last fall. A profile by NEWSWEEK's Jonathan Darman earlier this year illustrated Newsom's bet on progressive thinking catching on, but he has yet to be proven right.

It's possible that Newsom could still bounce back—anything's possible, really. Time is certainly on his side, but the credibility battle is only getting steeper. If he does survive, he'll owe Clinton more than a nice fruit basket for the early rescue. Although if Newsom finds himself in the same dubious position again, he'll have a tough time coming up with another "get out of jail free" card.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: MJ000777 (October 9, 2009 at 2:45 AM)

jphilli88 said: "Brown or Feinstein are much better choices.  Whoever is the Democratic candidate, though, is going to have to be hard center to the extent that the concerns of California business, including, small businesses, are addressed."  

You can't be serious. Haven't we had enough of Democrat Rule in Cali? Other than Ahhhnooold who tried for a year or two to govern as a Conservative the LEFTIST Liberal Democrats have ridden roughshod over this state.  Jerry Brown is a Nut and Feinstein is corrupt.  Democrats have never met a tax they didn't like, and they are Extreme on most social issues. Give us a (TAX) break and maybe most of us might stay here. And enforce the damn border if the Feds won't. And for Goodness sake let the farmers in the central valley have their water........jeeeez!  Time for a little Sanity.

WAKE UP Californians before it's too late!

Any Twosome Newsome is a JOKE!!!

J.C. Watts for President in 2012!!

"It's the Economy Stupid"

~ Clinton Campaign 1992


Posted By: jphilli88 (October 7, 2009 at 12:56 PM)

An excellent, well-thought out, well-written piece.  I agree with everything Mr. Stone has said. Newsom is perceived as a light weight, that's why he's not been able to raise the money so far.  Brown or Feinstein are much better choices.  Whoever is the Democratic candidate, though, is going to have to be hard center to the extent that the concerns of California business, including, small businesses, are addressed.  


Posted By: ICovertheWaterfront (October 7, 2009 at 11:57 AM)

California's state governent is perhaps the most dysfunctional in the country - something orthodox journalism is vaguely aware of, without being courageous enough to confront the underlying roots of the dysfunction.  These include having politicians of the quality of Gavin Newsom as the political faces of the Democratic Party.  He is obviously more interested in trendy cultural issues such as same-sex marriage than in the nuts and bolts of 'how did California get into this mess, and how can it get out'?  At some point even California's liberal voters have to face reality, and perhaps Newsom's unimpressive start is related to the perception that he is a lightweight.  

The over-estimation of liberal big-city mayors - a function of the mainstream press' own urban orientation - is an old story.  I remember when John Lindsay was taken seriously as a national political figure.  Journalists yearned for a Democratic Party led by Robert Kennedy and a GOP led by John Lindsay or Nelson Rockefeller - all liberal New Yorkers.  It seems weird in retrospect, but there was much chat in the political-media echo chamber about it.  New York was still the leading state in the country by many measures at that time.  (It is now about to fall behind Florida as #4 in population.)  California has repeated NY's mistakes, and faintly ridiculous figures such as Newsom, Brown, Pelosi, Boxer, Villaraigosa, etc., symbolize the decay - having driven out middle-class business people who create jobs and tax base, the state's social spending is now promising more than it can deliver.  The old lessons still unlearned.  If Gavin Newsom has shown any dim awareness of the cost of anti-business attitudes and laws to his city and state, it hasn't reached my years.  He is among that class of people not called out by our lazy political media - rich or otherwise privileged people who turn their attention to political action to make it more difficult for other people to get rich.  There's California's sickness in a nutshell.