Spin Watch: Which Party Is Framing Election Results Better?

The Gaggle

RSS

Author

Holly Bailey

Katie Connolly

Featured Postings

Another Reason 2010 Isn't Exactly Like 1994

2:19 PM, November 5, 2009 | Comments (19)

Earlier this week Holly wrote a really interesting piece about the electoral parallels between now and 1993—and the fact that the GOP is hoping for a dramatic Democratic defeat in next year's midterms, similar to what happened in 1994. Holly points out...

Reid vs Obama Drama Not So Dramatic

2:11 PM, October 29, 2009 | Comments (1)

Sarah Palin Charging $100K for Iowa Speech? Not Exactly.

1:27 PM, October 29, 2009 | Comments (13)

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30

Newsweek

There’s nothing more characteristically Washington than a heaping helping of spin the morning after an election. It makes sense: both parties have face to save or unearned points to claim. It turns out that the weeks both parties spent trying to attach national significance to several regional elections has made for some pretty good spin.

Now, before we go to the tape, keep in mind several constants here. For one, both parties are looking at the same election results. That is, victories for the GOP in Virginia and New Jersey and a Dem win in a single, yet spotlighted, congressional district in upstate New York. And secondly, for the sake of consistency, we pulled the statements of both de facto party leaders, DNC head Tim Kaine and RNC Chairman Michael Steele—both of whom hold the same position in their parities and, we can reasonably speculate, would probably swap statements if the results were reversed.

That said, let’s start with the GOP’s Steele, who seems to go all-in on the Obama referenda implication, even though his party sang the exact opposite tune in 2001 after it was the victim of unfavorable election results:

“The Republican Party’s overwhelming victory in Virginia is a blow to President Obama and the Democrat Party.” And later on: “In a state [New Jersey] that overwhelmingly voted in favor of President Obama, this stunning defeat of Corzine sends a clear message to Democrats across the country. Americans have grown sick and tired of big government and reckless spending, and this vote is a sound rejection of the far-left policies that are hurting our nation.”

And how does Kaine respond? Well, by completely glossing over the fact that his party lost two races that it reasonably could have—and, some would say, should have—won, chalking it up to a historical impossibility:

"In both Virginia and New Jersey we had strong candidates who were running against a significant historical tide and faced uphill battles from the start of this campaign. In New Jersey, the party in power in the White House hasn't won the governor's office since 1985, and the party in power in the White House hasn't won the governor's office in Virginia since 1977. It would have been historic, if not unprecedented, to win one or both of these races, given historical trends.

So who wins here? The way we slice it, both do an impressive job of emphasizing and downplaying exactly what they want people to remember—and forget. But really, neither is trying too hard to play coy, which makes both pretty transparent, and thus rather cringe-worthy. We’re going to call it a draw. If you see it differently, let us know in the comments below.

You must be a registered user to comment. Click here to register. Already a user? Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: thehappyamerican (November 4, 2009 at 10:13 AM)

Obama's sharp and cutting attacks on Limbaugh, Beck, Fox News, and Tea Party attendees sure worked! Come on Obama! Tell us MORE about Limbaugh, Beck, Fox News and Tea Partyers who love their country!Stay on your attack until 2010!

Mr. President. There is a national discussion going on in the USA all day, every day. And if you are going to attack it, you will find you will be no part of it! You can not lead enlightened people from a dark place!

Report Abuse

Posted By: Davole (November 4, 2009 at 9:50 AM)

Several democrat politicians were rightly removed from positions of power in this election.

More of them will face the same fate in 2010 and 2012.

These results are definitely a set-back for Barack Obama and his anti-American administration.