Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Saturday, November 07, 2009 11:14 PM

Rep. Joseph Cao, the Sole Republican to Support Pelosi Health Bill

Daniel Stone

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor promised Capitol Hill protesters on Friday that not one Republican would approve the Democrats' health-care bill. But Cantor's vow of unanimity slipped Saturday night when the final vote tally, 220 to 215 in support of the bill, revealed Rep. Anh (Joseph) Cao, a Republican from Louisiana, cast a yes vote.

His reason for being the lone GOP nod? "I have always said that I would put aside partisan wrangling to do the business of the people. My vote tonight was based on my priority of doing what is best for my constituents," he said in a statement quickly released by his office. Earlier in the evening, he also supported a controversial amendment (which also passed) from Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak prohibiting any federal money from funding abortion.

The demographics in Cao's district would seem to have given a picture of where he would come down on the issue, although Democrats have for weeks counted out any Republican support. He received no call from the White House early Saturday, unlike several Democratic leaders who were reportedly sitting on the fence. Cao (pronounced gow) represents an area in the southern part of Louisiana, which includes areas around New Orleans, that's affected by one of the highest rates of poverty in the nation. It's also a district that usually goes to Democrats, but due to some ethical questions surrounding his Democratic opponent last fall, Cao won one of the biggest political upsets of the year. Following the vote Saturday evening, several Democratic lawmakers said that Cao did show signs that he was open to persuasion, having refused to make firm statements about how he would vote. Cao's timing also suggests that even before the late-night vote, he was confident in his decision. He pressed the 'yes' button several minutes before the voting window closed, meaning he wasn't planning to only vote yes in the final moments if absolutely necessary.

It's unclear whether Republican leaders will discipline Cao for breaking ranks and allowing Democrats to claim the bill had "bipartisan support." But what Cao can look forward to is the instant catapult into the national spotlight that his fellow Republican Rep. Joe Wilson received after calling President Obama a liar back in September. That and some new friends on Capitol Hill. On such a close vote, Cao is a hero to Democrats. But to Republicans, he's the one who got away.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: OMG!Harley!sBack (November 28, 2009 at 1:46 AM)

and again I wait...236 I believe it is now...lmao!


Posted By: OMG!Harley!sBack (November 18, 2009 at 4:57 PM)

looky daveyeforTheRightGuy likes to hear himself babble, getting all caught up on typos and AVOIDING the questions, disrespecting US MARINES and troops in general, and of course, his comments on people of color not deserving money or power...(primaries 08,pre-Obama election).

If you like I can ask that question again, I asked you so many times as you kept avoiding it that I know it by heart...interested in answering, the context was YOU trying to defend the surge in Iraq and me asking why NONE of that "logic" was applied to Afghanistan...here ya go:

Q: Why didn't Bush apply his "strategy" for Iraq to Afghanistan, instead of abandoning it to invade a country that has never attacked the US? Why did bush "CUT and RUN" to Iraq, why did he NOT "Finish what he started", "Stay The Course", "Fight them there" (instead of letting al qaeda follow US to Iraq)? see how none of the "propaganda phrases" you and your KLAN constantly puked up every where about Iraq where NEVER used or even conceived in Afghanistan. "IF" any of that had been applied, there would have been NO NEED for a "SURGE" in Iraq as there would have been NO Al Qaeda in Iraq to surge for and THOUSANDS of AMERICAN LIVES would have been saved along with tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians...WHY did bush ignore Afghanistan for nearly eight years, why did he abandon the troops there, lose focus on what "WE THE PEOPLE" wanted to be achieved by going to Afghansitan, wiping out Al Qaeda there and KILLING Bin Laden, WHY?

there ya go let's call it  235...I'll be waiting...AGAIN and as always

Oh yeah and one more thing, unlike the moronic KLAN you keep company with, thinking people don't the need to declare their president a saint (like you did bush), and can actually disagree with Obama. Putting mcchrystal in charge was to use Obama's words..."STUPID", mcchrystal in an appeaser to the Afghans, he care little for the actual reason we are supposed to be there and more about the "safety" of the Afghan people, even at the sacrifice of US troops.  As mcchrystal has shown he is not afraid to politicize our troops (PAT TILLMAN for one). That is NOT a safe mind set for one who calls for more troops, even in the face of several other generals opposing a "surge" there. Less than 100 al qaeda members are left in Afghanistan, why do we need nearly 100K troops (total w/extra 44k) there? Sounds like special forces to me, 100 targets, clean and quick, then get the F@#K out. Karzai is a know tali ban sympathizer, why should we support his government, while he(karzai) gives money and support the the very people attacking US troops there? Now in your feeble mind, you can't conceive of someone who supports a president feeling ANY descent  with that president, but it's called free thinking, I don't have to agree with EVERYTHING Obama does, he's human, he'll make mistakes, bad choices...but unlike the MORON before, he'll admit it, take ownership of it and try to learn from it...

anyway, I'll be waiting and probably counting...


Posted By: Davole (November 18, 2009 at 12:02 AM)

OMG (Obama's Muttering Groupie) - hardly here nor there -  

Just like a spoiled little brat, you persist in posting your off-topic rant. This is it - my final accommodating reply on this thread - no more!  

What’s prompting your current tantrum - is your child’s diaper too tight, or is it clogged with your repugnant waste?

Don’t you realize that General Stanley McChrystal was personally selected by your poor excuse for a president to be the military commander best suited to lead his war strategy and effort?  

And although Major Nidal Malik Hasan is only a major, he still ranks as a SENIOR MILITARY OFFICIAL. Wasn’t he promoted to that rank under the rank Barack Obama command?

I didn’t bother answering your self-admitted simple question posed 230+ times because I realize that your simple mind could not correctly comprehend the answer.    

You have not provided any proof to validate your preposterous and false claim that I hate US troops.

And is there any logical, and I repeat LOGICAL explanation for your puzzling comment “i was my cousin who was victim of and IED attack in Iraq.” Hardly, don’t you realize that you cannot be your cousin? And instead of using the word “and,” you should have stated “an.” Gee, I purposely set the IQ bar very low for you, and yet you still failed to clear it.

Do your supposed cousin and supposed son humour you by allowing you to parade around the block on your pink tricycle while wearing their military medals?  

And have you bragged to them regarding your pathetic and unpatriotic previously posted applause regarding the fact that some of their fellow soldiers had been returned to the US in coffins and body-bags?

To refute your false allegations that I had denigrated people of colour - you can’t even pay attention to facts such as proper spelling (case in point - Betrayus, MUREDER , feb, amde, wring), therefore that explains why you can’t pay attention to my detailed specific comments.

I notice that you failed to divulge the number of times that you have been banned from this Newsweek site, and the specific aliases that you have used.

Hardly, don’t you realize that your challenge “Name 3 things Bush did wring or failed at as president?” doesn’t make sense?

And I deliberately specified that my reference to you swallowing the ball was a tennis term - yet somehow you interpreted that differently, probably in accordance with your previously revealed perverted lifestyle.

Lastly, you do not own me - all you own is the offensive crap overflowing as your opinion from your soiled diaper!