Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:08 AM

Republicans Narrowly Lead Democrats in 2010 Vote

Holly Bailey

Here’s more evidence that independents will be the voting bloc to watch ahead of next year’s 2010 midterms: for the first time in seven years—and more important, this election cycle—a new Gallup poll finds Republicans narrowly leading Democrats in the so-called generic congressional ballot. According to Gallup, if the election were held today, 48 percent of registered voters would choose the GOP candidate, compared with 44 percent who would vote Dem. That’s an eight-point gain for Republicans over the last year. Just a month ago, the GOP trailed Democrats 44 percent to 46 percent. The reason for the slight GOP edge: Republicans now have a 22-point lead over Democrats among so-called independent voters. According to Gallup, indies favor Republicans 52 percent to 30 percent—numbers that were literally reversed a year ago. It’s a trend that hasn’t exactly been gradual: In July, Republicans led Dems by 1 percent among independents. Last month, there was a nine-point difference in favor of Republicans. Now, a month later, the GOP’s advantage has doubled. All of this comes a week after a surge of independents helped Republicans clinch governor’s races in Virginia and New Jersey.

Last week, I wrote about the GOP’s hope that 2010 would be a repeat of 1994, when the party surged among voters and regained control of Congress. As I noted, there are many differences—not least the GOP’s baggage among voters. Their approval rating is just as low, if not lower, than Democrats' in Congress. Yet this poll would seem to bolster the GOP’s argument that 2010 won’t be about Republicans as much as it will be a referendum on President Obama. What your Gaggler would like to see is a poll showing exactly what is prompting independents to move toward the GOP. No doubt, the economy is a big issue. But are they also worried about the scope of the Democrats’ health-care plan? Is it spending? Whatever it is, here’s the big worry for Obama and Democratic leadership in Congress: polls like this are bound to make Dems who were already jittery about 2010 even more nervous and perhaps less likely to sign on to Obama’s ambitious legislative agenda. That's bad news as Obama pushes to get health care finished before the end of the year. While the House passed health care over the weekend and the Senate, if Harry Reid gets his way, will take up its version soon, the tricky part comes when the two bills will be merged. Polls showing Republicans gaining traction—even if it is slight overall—is sure to make Obama's job at keeping his party united even more difficult.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: MJ000777 (November 12, 2009 at 9:31 PM)

NWDick why must you continue to blame Bush (and Evil D. Cheney) for all of Obama's crap.  He is the one spending, printing, and borrowing over twice as much as Bush.  If you think Bush did a crap job then you should be outraged at what Obama is doing now.  You claim we are inconsistent; well look in the mirror Dickie! Use a little common sense for once.

"It's the Economy Stupid"

~ Clinton Campaign 1992


Posted By: NewsWkDickG (November 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM)

It really isn't about conservative v liberal as that is just constantly hyped for affect.  For eight years the Republican Party strongly and stubbornly supported everything the Bush Administration did as it totally placated and patronized Special Interests and a select few with an in-your-face arrogance and under the camouflage of being conservative.  Together they irresponsibly and unconscionably encouraged the dishonesty, self-indulgence and neglect that literally contributed to bringing down most systems and that just isn't conservatism.  Over those eight years, as everything was steadily going down hill, the government continually demonstrated an unconscionable irresponsibility in offering the majority only total apathy, the costs and substantial subterfuge while they focused on benefit for Special Interests and a select few who provided overt and covert support, substantial contributions and promises for after office compensation; all along the separation between the middle-class and the wealthy continued to grow.  Bush then unapologetically just passed a gargantuan mess on to Obama, and the Republican Party proceeded to block/obstruct, without any regard for other than their own interests, all efforts to solve problems.  Without ever contributing anything positive or constructive they now aggressively criticize the Obama Administration for not totally turning things around in just ten months.  You want more proof that they could care less about the majority, only seeking to control public opinion with subterfuge, and are really focused on serving Special Interests and the select few, then look at what they are doing with Sarah Palin. They are busy working on building her support within the Party and next they will focus on aggressively selling her to the public. You can find many faults with Sarah Palin; she is arrogant, self-centered, egotistic, grossly dishonest, can be pompous and obnoxious and is literally sociopathic without any conscience, to name just an obvious few.  What is more disturbing though is she is another, like G W Bush, 'puppet'; a puppet for Special Interests and the influential, powerful and wealthy few.  As they would satisfy her egotistic drive she would have no guilt or hesitation in doing their bidding, just like Bush-Cheney.  If ever they are successful we can literally be totally fearful of experiencing 'more of the same'.  If they ever succeed with a ticket like Palin-Kyl, we could end up thinking that maybe Bush-Cheney wasn't near as bad.  Today everyone should be able to recognize the lies, the scare tactics and the appeals to prejudices and emotions, all intended to mislead and manipulate the majority and benefit only the few.  Anyone who accepts/supports their efforts and the substantial overt and covert activity of their patrons, aimed to return to 'more of the same', obviously has to be certifiably crazy.  Anyone who is willing to ignore the consequences, at the very least, simply has to be masochistic.


Posted By: Morgan2008 (November 12, 2009 at 3:12 AM)

I get e-mails letting me know how my representatives and senators vote on issues.  There is one democratic house representative that I voted for last time who is not going to get my vote in the next election because he voted for Obama's and Nancy Pelosi's outrageous House HealthCare Reform bill when the majority of his constituents are against it. Obama rubberstampers are going to be fired by the voters in the next election.  Believe it!  It is a referendum on Obama because Obama is not looking like the person you want to be answering the 3:00 a.m. emergency phone calls.  He can't even make a decision when he has plenty of time.  The man is in a job over his head...Obama's big spending which is doing nothing for the economy and his radical policies are not going to help him or any of the congressional democrats who back his policies get re-elected.  If they keep going down the path they are going, they will all be gone in the next election.