Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... - Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Saturday, November 21, 2009 3:05 PM

Reid Gets His 60 Votes, but Still Has His Work Cut Out

Katie Connolly

It's official: Harry Reid has corralled enough votes to bring his health-care-reform bill to the floor. Blanche Lincoln became the 60th Democrat committed to voting to allow debate to open on the bill, following her moderate colleague Mary Landrieu, who also announced today that she'd vote aye. But Reid still has his work cut out for him. This vote signals little about the ultimate viability of the bill. For all the furrowed brows and gnashing of teeth to get to today's 60 yes votes, this vote simply says that the Senate is prepared to have a debate on the bill. From here, the bill will be discussed and possibly amended. Then Reid must find another 60 votes to end the debate, and then he'll need at least 51 senators who want to vote the final product up. Clearly his work is far from over. This reluctance to even allow the bill to be debated—keeping in mind there will be two other opportunities to vote against it—illustrates the depth of moderate concerns.

Neither Lincoln's nor Landrieu's vote today comes with a guarantee that the senators will support the final bill. Both have expressed serious reservations about the legislation, particularly the inclusion of the opt-out public option. They might vote to amend the public option to a trigger version, or they might vote to strip it out of the bill entirely. It's unclear. But Landrieu offered one glimmer of hope to her liberal counterparts today, saying that on the public option she "would consider a principled compromise because I understand this is one of the issues we have to find a solution for or it could blow up the whole effort."

Reid also faces problems in the form of Ben Nelson, who will torpedo the bill if it doesn't contain stronger anti-abortion provisions, and Joe Lieberman, who said he'd join a Republican filibuster if the public-option provision isn't changed. So the bill still has a ways to go, but at least now the Senate will have an open debate about it. 

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: gvillagran3 (November 24, 2009 at 4:37 PM)

wwh1311446.

Given that a full 56 % (by the latest polls) of the American people want a public option, and a full 67% want some one to fix health care , your observation that Independents will have a problem with the 60 votes is ridiculous.

Had Landreau voted "NO" that would have killed the bill's chances to even be debated in the floor. That my friend would have destroyed her chances for re-election (last time I checked she was a Democrat) , and the chances for the re-election of all the Blue dog Democrats. Republicans would love nothing more than to take a desastrous failure by Democrats to pass their own bill.

So as chances with Independents  go , Landreau did exactly the right thing. Get more for her State, while voting the only way she could.... "YES" .


Posted By: wwh1311446 (November 24, 2009 at 3:11 PM)

Senator Snowe: "When History calls, history calls."

Senator Landreau: "When history calls, it's going to cost you'all.

Is it Southern hospitality, or, the death knell for health care?

The 60th vote is not going to sit well with independent voters, the majority party!


Posted By: gvillagran3 (November 24, 2009 at 12:40 PM)

Davole.

There is a reason why parrots like you can't quote the stock performance of the companies involved in the controversy about health care. The reason is Fox does not talk about that at all. And the reason Fox does not mention one word, ever about stock valuation of the very same companies that supposedly will be so "terribly" affected by the horrible "Socialist" Government of Obama , is because the numbers are not only up,  BUT WAY UP since Obama took office.

In other words it would sound very STUPID to be complaining about a plan that is giving share holders in the Insurance Health Care sector a 34 % PROFIT , since the controversy started right Mr. B.S ' er Davole?

Just to put it in context Mr. B. S er Davole... If you are lucky, you'll get a 2% return on a CD in ONE YEAR.... Now that's a terrible performance, but dumbos like you if not told by Fox , will never complain about that, prefering instead to  complain about a 34% return on investment IN JUST 6 MONTHS !!!!!!

You guys in the Right are not called "nuts" for nothing.