Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
  • Can Gay Marriage Promote Values?

    Katie Connolly | May 12, 2009 03:38 PM

    This Sunday, May 17, is the five year anniversary of the first gay marriage license issued in Massachusetts, the first state in the nation to allow same sex partners to wed. Since then, over 10,000 gay and lesbian couples have taken marriage vows. (The first gay couple married in Massachusetts - Susan Shepard and Marcia Hams - will celebrate their five year anniversary on Sunday too.)  Although Massachusetts has a reputation for liberalism, the path to gay marriage was a tough one, which ended in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. In November 2003, when the court ruled to allow gay marriage, only 50 members of the state's 200-strong legislature supported the move, and barely a majority of voters were in favor. But today, a poll sponsored by Hattaway Communications and grassroots advocacy group Marriage Equality Works shows that a decent majority Massachusetts residents now support it.

    Lake Research Partners, who conducted the survey, asked 600 Massachusetts residents whether they would vote for or against a state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Fully 62% of respondents said they would oppose such an amendment, up from 52% in a similar 2005 survey. Interestingly, the poll found that many residents supported marriage equality because it promoted traditional values like commitment and responsibility. This finding will surely come as a suprise to anti-gay marriage advocates who argue that it undermines the foundations of the family.

    Respondents were asked "Do you agree or disagree that the following outcome has surfaced because gay and lesbian couples can legally marry:
    Marriage encourages responsibility and commitment, which are important values for a strong society. It’s better for society that more couples are taking responsibility and making long-term commitments to each other." Fully 74% of people agreed with that statement. Overall, Massachusetts folks seemed proud of their state, with 60% saying that gay marriage had helped the state live up to its values of equality and fairness. They also tend to believe the rest of the country should acknowledge their laws: 70% of respondents thought that gay and lesbian couples married in Massachusetts should receive all the same federal benefits as other married couples. In terms of demographics, younger, more educated, less religious people were more likely to be supportive of marriage equality, and women were slightly more supportive than men.

    Doug Hattaway, CEO of Hattaway Communication, explained to your Gaggler that the results shouldn't be dismissed just because they come from a reliably blue state. Massachusetts has a significant Catholic population that is often socially conservative. Achieving marriage equality wasn't a walk in the park to begin with, and there were repeated attempts to amend the constitution to ban gay marriage following the Supreme Court's 2003 ruling. "Our side had a pretty hard mountain to climb," Hattaway said. But attitudes slowly changed. When the last constitutional amendment was offered in 2007, 151 of the 200 legislators voted to defeat it. Hattaway noted that no state legislators had lost their seats as a result of opposing the constitutional amendment.  

    The poll isn't reliable indicator of national attitudes towards gay marriage - consider the passage of Proposition 8 in California. Nor does it gauge the depth of emotion around the idea of same sex marriage. Oddly enough, while the issue often gets treated as a hot button one, Hattaway says that one of the difficulties marriage equality proponents have in making their case is that many people don't really care deeply about it because it doesn't affect them. It's not until they're forced to deal with it that their opinions really develop. What this poll suggests is that once made legal, attitudes towards gay marriage soften over time. 



  • The Pressure Is On Pawlenty

    Katie Connolly | May 12, 2009 03:00 PM

    A coalition of left-leaning advocacy groups and unions is stepping up the pressure on Tim Pawlenty to certify the results on Minneosta's Senate Race and to seat Al Franken if the Minnesota Supreme Court rejects Norm Coleman's appeal. They've unveiled a giant billboard in St. Paul which implies that T-Paw is more concerned about his future as a national GOP figure than his constituents in Minnesota. Americans United For Change sent around a photo of the billboard this afternoon:



  • Advertisement
  • The Obama Effect... On Chicago

    Katie Connolly | May 12, 2009 12:01 PM

    The Washington Post has a fun story today about the surge in Obama-related tourism in the Windy City. Calling him a "one man stimulus" package, the Post reports that:

    Chicago's tourism office has trained 30 volunteers to lead Obama tours. On Saturdays starting next month, a greeter will be posted in Obama's former Hyde Park neighborhood to direct walking tours that will also include Frank Lloyd Wright's Robie House and the University of Chicago.It is impossible to quantify the Obama effect in a city so large and touristed, but at least 15 Chicago companies that conduct tours for conventioneers, students and tourists have added Obama stops or an entire Obama tour to their offerings.

    For $25, one tour group will even take you past the now-defunct ice cream parlor where Barack and Michelle first kissed, as well as the basketball court where Michelle had her brother Craig play against her new boyfriend for the first time. 

     


  • In the Heezy. Wassup?

    Katie Connolly | May 12, 2009 11:49 AM

    The President has gotten pretty good reviews for his speech at the White House Correspondents Association dinner on Saturday night. Your Gaggler for one thought the POTUS was pretty darn funny. (Although I think I laughed hardest at Wanda Sykes' nipple riff.) Around the blogosphere, it seems that Obama's shoutout to GOP chair Michael Steele was the biggest hit, which made your Gaggler think that there may soon be a run on these shirts:

     You can buy your very own for just $15.

  • Unturnings: White House vying for 2016 Chicago Olympics

    Newsweek | May 12, 2009 08:31 AM

    Our favorites this morning from around the web:

    Obama and aides play favorites for Olympics
    Chicago isn't the only U.S. city vying for the Olympics, but top White House adviser Valerie Jarret is heading a push on behalf of the POTUS to bring the 2016 games to the Windy City. (Politico)

    GOP: Just don't pick a bad nominee

    Even before Obama names a nominee to the Supreme Court, Republicans are looking deeply into the names already floating around. Taking a cue from the all-around embarrassing nomination of Robert Bork in 1987, one GOP senator plans to preempt Obama from making an unacceptable choice. (Washington Times)

    Washington devising a fix for media

    Can Washington really help an ailing news industry? Several senators think so, and are making it their crusade to push legislation to change the business model of the country's biggest media organizations. (NPR)

    Pay no attention to the lobbyist behind the curtain
    The White House has set up barriers against lobbying for the $787 billion stimulus package. Now, lobbyists that had success under past administration are trying to restrategize. One method: sidestep yourself and send your client to make their own case. (AP)